World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
15273
World Ranking
5480
National Ranking
2590

Marcia P. Miceli publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia P. Miceli sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 66 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Marcia P. Miceli D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia P. Miceli sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcia P. Miceli is affiliated with Georgetown University in the United States. Their academic profile is focused on research activities conducted within this institution.

No recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields of study, or main research topics have been recorded in the available data. Additionally, there is no information about awards received by this scholar.

Given the absence of detailed publication records, specific research topics, or collaborative networks, it can be inferred that the publicly accessible data on Marcia P. Miceli's academic contributions is limited at this time.

Best Publications

  • Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli

  • Blowing the whistle : the organizational and legal implications for companies and employees

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near

  • Whistle-Blowing in Organizations

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near;Terry Morehead Dworkin

  • Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing: A Prosocial Behavior Perspective

    Janelle Brinker Dozier;Marcia P. Miceli

  • An Exploration of the Meaning and Consequences of Workaholism

    Kimberly S. Scott;Keirsten S. Moore;Marcia P. Miceli

  • Effective-Whistle Blowing

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli

  • Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions.

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near

  • Whistle-Blowing: Myth and Reality:

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli

  • The Relationships Among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-Blowing Status: A Discriminant Analysis

    Marcia Parmerlee Miceli;Janet P. Near

  • INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATIONAL CORRELATES OF WHISTLE‐BLOWING

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near

  • Antecedents and Outcomes of Retaliation Against Whistleblowers: Gender Differences and Power Relationships

    Michael T. Rehg;Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near;James R. Van Scotter

  • Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistle-Blowing Process?

    Janet P. Near;Michael T. Rehg;James R. Van Scotter;Marcia P. Miceli

  • WHO BLOWS THE WHISTLE AND WHY

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near;Charles R. Schwenk

  • A Word to the Wise: How Managers and Policy-Makers Can Encourage Employees to Report Wrongdoing

    Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near;Terry Morehead Dworkin;Terry Morehead Dworkin

  • Retaliation against whistle blowers: Predictors and effects.

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli

  • Blowing the Whistle

    Janet P. Near;Marcia P. Miceli;Hugh Dallas;Toni Schumacher

  • Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers

    David B. Greenberger;Marcia P. Miceli;Debra J. Cohen

  • Predicting employee reactions to perceived organizational wrongdoing: Demoralization, justice, proactive personality, and whistle-blowing

    Marcia P Miceli;Janet P Near;Michael T Rehg;James R Van Scotter

  • Can Laws Protect Whistle-Blowers? Results of a Naturally Occurring Field Experiment

    Marcia P. Miceli;Michael Rehg;Janet P. Near;Katherine C. Ryan

  • Predictors and outcomes of reactions to pay-for-performance plans.

    Marcia P. Miceli;Iljae Jung;Janet P. Near;David B. Greenberger

  • Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees.

    Jill W. Graham;Marcia P. Miceli;Janet P. Near

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet P. Near
Janet P. Near University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Marshall Schminke
Marshall Schminke University of Central Florida
Sandra Waddock
Sandra Waddock Boston College
Andrew Crane
Andrew Crane University of Bath
Andrew C. Wicks
Andrew C. Wicks University of Virginia
Gary R. Weaver
Gary R. Weaver University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs tailored to today’s workforce demands. Aspiring counselors can explore the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) to gain skills in supporting K-12 students and pursuing school-based counseling careers.

Those interested in helping families and couples may consider online marriage and family therapy programs, which prepare graduates to address relationship challenges and offer therapeutic support in clinical settings.

For a broader foundation in human behavior, the bachelor of science in psychology provides diverse knowledge for roles in research, mental health, and social services.

Additionally, advancing your qualifications with one of the masters in social work online programs can open career opportunities in clinical social work, policy, and advocacy.

Each of these online pathways addresses a growing need in society, making them excellent choices for those passionate about making a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Marcia P. Miceli