World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 84 129 119 65 60 187 76772

Linda Klebe Treviño publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Klebe Treviño between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Klebe Treviño published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1992. 6 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1992. 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication
1986 2025

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Klebe Treviño: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 3
1987 3
1988 0
1989 0
1990 5
1991 0
1992 14
1993 9
1994 7
1995 4
1996 8
1997 2
1998 4
1999 14
2000 2
2001 9
2002 2
2003 10
2004 4
2005 7
2006 7
2007 4
2008 5
2009 3
2010 4
2011 8
2012 3
2013 9
2014 9
2015 4
2016 3
2017 9
2018 5
2019 6
2020 7
2021 4
2022 4
2023 6
2024 5
2025 1
Total 213
Download as CSV

Linda Klebe Treviño publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Klebe Treviño sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 185–189 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 187 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59 187
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Klebe Treviño D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Klebe Treviño sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6 84
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award

Overview

Linda Klebe Treviño is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans social sciences with a strong focus on organizational behavior and human resource management, sociology and political science, information systems and management, gender studies, and communication.

Their work addresses key topics including ethics in business and education, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, workplace violence and bullying, management and organizational studies, gender diversity and inequality, employment and welfare studies, and challenges related to work-family balance.

Recent publications by Linda Klebe Treviño include:

  • Promotive and prohibitive ethical voice: Coworker emotions and support for the voice (2022), Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Unethical leadership: A review, analysis, and research agenda (2022), Personnel Psychology
  • The consequences of ethical voice inside the organization: An integrative review (2023), Journal of Applied Psychology
  • The Dark Side of Status at Work: Perceived Status Importance, Envy, and Interpersonal Deviance (2022), Business Ethics Quarterly
  • Welcome to the club? Unethical behavior and proactivity in promotion and derailment decisions (2023), Journal of Organizational Behavior

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Linda Klebe Treviño include:

  • Anjier Chen
  • Glen E. Kreiner
  • Marie S. Mitchell
  • Gabriela Rivera
  • Derron G. Bishop

Their scholarly contributions have appeared in several publication venues, notably:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Personnel Psychology
  • Business Ethics Quarterly

Best Publications

  • Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing

    Michael E. Brown;Linda K. Treviño;David A. Harrison

  • Ethical leadership: A review and future directions

    Michael E. Brown;Linda K. Treviño

  • Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model

    Linda Klebe Trevino

  • Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: implications for information systems

    Richard L. Daft;Robert H. Lengel;Linda Klebe Trevino

  • Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review:

    Linda K. Treviño;Gary R. Weaver;Scott J. Reynolds

  • Bad Apples, Bad Cases, and Bad Barrels: Meta-Analytic Evidence About Sources of Unethical Decisions at Work

    Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart;David A. Harrison;Linda Klebe Treviño

  • Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right

    Linda Klebe Treviño;Katherine A. Nelson

  • Moral Person and Moral Manager: How Executives Develop a Reputation for Ethical Leadership:

    Linda Klebe Treviño;Laura Pincus Hartman;Michael Brown

  • A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Executive Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Executive Suite

    Linda Klebe Treviño;Michael Brown;Laura Pincus Hartman

  • Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research

    Donald L. McCabe;Linda Klebe Trevino;Kenneth D. Butterfield

  • The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions.

    Jane Webster;Linda Klebe Trevino;Lisa Ryan

  • The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors

    Linda Klebe Treviño;Kenneth D. Butterfield;Donald L. McCabe

  • Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior.

    Linda Klebe Trevino;Stuart A. Youngblood

  • Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication Electronic Mail and Voice Mail Evaluation and Impacts

    Linda Klebe Trevino;Jane Webster

  • Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes.

    James R. Detert;Linda Klebe Treviño;Vicki L. Sweitzer

  • Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences

    Donald L. McCabe;Linda Klebe Trevino

  • Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

    Linda Klebe Trevino;Robert H. Lengel;Richard L. Daft

  • Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation

    Donald L. McCabe;Linda Klebe Trevino

  • WHY EMPLOYEES DO BAD THINGS: MORAL DISENGAGEMENT AND UNETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

    Celia Moore;James R. Detert;Linda Klebe Treviño;Vicki L. Baker

  • Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices

    Gary R. Weaver;Linda Klebe TreviÑo;Philip L. Cochran

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary R. Weaver
Gary R. Weaver University of Delaware
Donald L. McCabe
Donald L. McCabe Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Steve W. J. Kozlowski
Steve W. J. Kozlowski University of South Florida
Bruce J. Avolio
Bruce J. Avolio University of Washington
David M. Mayer
David M. Mayer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David A. Harrison
David A. Harrison The University of Texas at Austin
Dennis A. Gioia
Dennis A. Gioia Pennsylvania State University
Robert G. Lord
Robert G. Lord Durham University
Jane Webster
Jane Webster Queen's University
Sean T. Hannah
Sean T. Hannah Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Business and Management in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of related online degrees and career opportunities. Many students are now pursuing specialized programs such as a construction project management degree online to enter thriving fields like construction and project coordination.

For those interested in the healthcare sector, online healthcare administration programs can lead to management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. These degrees are designed to provide the leadership skills needed for a rapidly evolving industry.

There is also a growing demand for fast track college programs, which enable students to earn their qualifications quickly, saving both time and money while advancing their careers sooner.

Additionally, many students choose online business degree programs accredited by reputable institutions for added flexibility and credibility. These options ensure a strong foundation in business principles and greater career mobility.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Klebe Treviño

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles