What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Social psychology
- Higher education
His scientific interests lie mostly in Cheating, Academic integrity, Social psychology, Academic dishonesty and Higher education.
His research on Cheating frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Pedagogy.
Donald L. McCabe focuses mostly in the field of Academic integrity, narrowing it down to matters related to Medical education and, in some cases, Peer pressure, Business education, Certainty and Action.
His Social psychology research incorporates themes from Honor, Ethical code and Normative.
He combines subjects such as Code and Convergence with his study of Ethical code.
His Higher education study deals with Mathematics education intersecting with Popularity.
His most cited work include:
- The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors (806 citations)
- Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research (761 citations)
- Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences (724 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Donald L. McCabe spends much of his time researching Cheating, Higher education, Social psychology, Academic dishonesty and Academic integrity.
His study in Cheating is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Pedagogy, Honor, Honesty, Public relations and Medical education.
His Higher education research includes themes of Mathematics education and Ethical code.
His work on Dishonesty as part of general Social psychology study is frequently connected to Sample, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His Academic dishonesty research includes elements of Cross-cultural, Criminology, Deception and Accountability.
His Academic integrity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Test, Sanctions and Misconduct.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cheating (70.83%)
- Higher education (43.75%)
- Social psychology (37.50%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2013)?
- Cheating (70.83%)
- Academic integrity (35.42%)
- Higher education (43.75%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Cheating, Academic integrity, Higher education, Academic dishonesty and Public relations.
His research in Cheating intersects with topics in Empirical research and Alliance.
His Academic integrity research integrates issues from Test and Medical education.
His research integrates issues of Pedagogy, Social psychology and Misconduct in his study of Higher education.
Donald L. McCabe combines subjects such as Nursing, Nursing ethics, Deception and MEDLINE with his study of Academic dishonesty.
Donald L. McCabe interconnects Dilemma, Intellectual property and Action in the investigation of issues within Public relations.
Between 2005 and 2013, his most popular works were:
- Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs: Prevalence, Causes, and Proposed Action (448 citations)
- Cheating in College: Why Students Do It and What Educators Can Do about It (109 citations)
- Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors (109 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Social psychology
- Higher education
His primary areas of investigation include Academic integrity, Academic dishonesty, Public relations, Cheating and Sample.
His Academic integrity study incorporates themes from Action, Medical education, Certainty, Business education and Peer pressure.
His study brings together the fields of Test and Academic dishonesty.
His Public relations research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Autonomy, Intellectual property and Dilemma.
His Cheating study often links to related topics such as Alliance.
Sample combines with fields such as Cross-cultural, Middle East, Higher education, Individualistic culture and Social psychology in his research.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
