World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
8012
World Ranking
7839
National Ranking
4214

Shane Connelly publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shane Connelly sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Shane Connelly D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shane Connelly sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shane Connelly is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States and specializes primarily in the social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, notably social psychology, sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, statistical and nonlinear physics, and communication.

The main topics of Shane Connelly's work include:

  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Recent publications by Shane Connelly cover a range of subjects within these fields. Notable papers include:

  • "Misinformation of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy" (2022), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups" (2020), published in The Leadership Quarterly
  • "The danger of "fake news": how using social media for information dissemination can inhibit the ethical decision making process" (2021), published in Ethics & Behavior
  • "Understanding motivations and deterrents for COVID-19 vaccination among US working adults: A mixed method approach" (2022), published in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • "An Agent-Based Model of Leader Emergence and Leadership Perception within a Collective" (2020), published in Complexity

Shane Connelly collaborates frequently with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Michael D. Mumford
  • Neil G. MacLaren
  • Francis J. Yammarino
  • Shelley D. Dionne
  • Hiroki Sayama

Their research contributions have appeared repeatedly in specialized academic venues, including:

  • Ethics & Behavior
  • The Leadership Quarterly
  • Complexity
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review

    Janaki Gooty;Shane Connelly;Jennifer Griffith;Alka Gupta

  • The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: A meta-analytic review

    Amanda D. Angie;Shane Connelly;Ethan P. Waples;Vykinta Kligyte

  • A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Business Ethics Instruction

    Ethan P. Waples;Alison L. Antes;Stephen T. Murphy;Shane Connelly

  • A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness

    Michael D. Mumford;Shane Connelly;Ryan P. Brown;Stephen T. Murphy

  • Failure feedback as an affective event: Influences of leader affect on subordinate attitudes and performance

    Blaine Gaddis;Shane Connelly;Michael D. Mumford

  • How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases

    Michael D Mumford;Shane Connelly;Blaine Gaddis

  • A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences

    Alison L. Antes;Stephen T. Murphy;Ethan P. Waples;Michael D. Mumford

  • Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences

    Logan L. Watts;Kelsey E. Medeiros;Tyler J. Mulhearn;Logan M. Steele

  • ARTICLES: Validation of Ethical Decision Making Measures: Evidence for a New Set of Measures

    Michael D. Mumford;Lynn D. Devenport;Ryan P. Brown;Shane Connelly

  • A managerial in-basket study of the impact of trait emotions on ethical choice

    Shane Connelly;Whitney Helton-Fauth;Michael D. Mumford

  • The Influence of Anger, Fear, and Emotion Regulation on Ethical Decision Making

    Vykinta Kligyte;Shane Connelly;Chase E. Thiel;Lynn Devenport

  • Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making.

    Alison L. Antes;Xiaoqian Wang;Michael D. Mumford;Ryan P. Brown

  • How Do We Know What Works? A Review and Critique of Current Practices in Ethics Training Evaluation

    Logan M Steele;Tyler J Mulhearn;Kelsey E Medeiros;Logan L Watts

  • Case-Based Knowledge and Ethics Education: Improving Learning and Transfer Through Emotionally Rich Cases

    Chase E. Thiel;Shane Connelly;Lauren N. Harkrider;Lynn D. Devenport

  • Leadership style and activating potential moderators of the relationships among leader emotional displays and outcomes

    Shane Connelly;Gregory Ruark

  • Leadership and emotion management for complex tasks: Different emotions, different strategies

    Chase E. Thiel;Shane Connelly;Jennifer A. Griffith

  • Personality and ethical decision-making in research: the role of perceptions of self and others.

    Alison L. Antes;Ryan P. Brown;Stephen T. Murphy;Ethan P. Waples

  • Environmental Influences on Ethical Decision Making: Climate and Environmental Predictors of Research Integrity

    Michael D. Mumford;Stephen T. Murphy;Shane Connelly;Jason H. Hill

  • The sources of leader violence: A comparison of ideological and non-ideological leaders

    Michael D. Mumford;Jazmine Espejo;Samuel Todd Hunter;Katrina E. Bedell-Avers

  • Creativity and Ethics: The Relationship of Creative and Ethical Problem-Solving.

    Michael D. Mumford;Ethan P. Waples;Alison L. Antes;Ryan P. Brown

  • Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering

    Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet;David Edmonds;Nigel Warburton;Kelsey Medeiros

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael D. Mumford
Michael D. Mumford University of Oklahoma
Lynn D. Devenport
Lynn D. Devenport University of Oklahoma
Francis J. Yammarino
Francis J. Yammarino Binghamton University
Stephen J. Zaccaro
Stephen J. Zaccaro George Mason University
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University
John T. Chibnall
John T. Chibnall Saint Louis University
Jelte M. Wicherts
Jelte M. Wicherts Tilburg University
Suzanne Guerin
Suzanne Guerin University College Dublin
Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
Gianluca Setti
Gianluca Setti Polytechnic University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens many flexible career opportunities, especially in counseling and mental health services. Accredited online programs allow students to advance their education while balancing work or family commitments. Many states now offer accelerated routes to counseling licensure, streamlining the transition from degree to professional practice.

For those eager to begin a counseling career quickly, it’s important to consider regional requirements. For example, potential counselors can review the Arkansas fastest counseling programs for an efficient education and licensing pathway. If you’re planning to practice on the West Coast, the shortest path to becoming a counselor in California may be of interest.

Similarly, those interested in the Rocky Mountain region can explore the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Colorado. For learners in New England, the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Connecticut offers guidance on efficient licensure.

Researching state-specific requirements ensures you select an online program that aligns with your career goals and local regulations, making your journey from student to licensed counselor as smooth as possible.

Best Scientists Citing Shane Connelly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles