World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4045 3730 2267 2043 174 11937

John T. Chibnall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John T. Chibnall between 1987 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John T. Chibnall published across 38 years, from 1987 to 2024, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2016. 3 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2016. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
1987 2024

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John T. Chibnall: publications per year, 1987 to 2024
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 3
1989 3
1990 5
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 9
1995 3
1996 1
1997 4
1998 4
1999 3
2000 5
2001 7
2002 8
2003 3
2004 9
2005 17
2006 9
2007 5
2008 11
2009 5
2010 7
2011 8
2012 10
2013 12
2014 12
2015 7
2016 18
2017 9
2018 8
2019 5
2020 3
2021 5
2022 0
2023 1
2024 2
Total 223
Download as CSV

John T. Chibnall publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Chibnall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 174
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John T. Chibnall D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Chibnall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John T. Chibnall is affiliated with Saint Louis University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and health professions, with specific attention to general health professions, pharmacology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and public health. Chibnall's work extensively addresses issues related to musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, patient satisfaction in healthcare, pain management and placebo effect, patient-provider communication in healthcare, opioid use disorder treatment, climate change and health impacts, as well as suicide and self-harm studies.

Their recent publications include the following:

  • Community Perspectives on Patient Credibility and Provider Burden in the Treatment of Chronic Pain, 2021, Pain Medicine
  • A Preliminary Study of Provider Burden in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Perspectives of Physicians and People with Chronic Pain, 2021, Journal of Pain
  • Seasonal variation in suicide: age group and summer effects in the United States (2015-2020), 2024, BMC Psychiatry
  • Does a brief functional assessment in the emergency department predict outcomes of patients admitted with heart failure? The FASTER-HF study, 2020, Archives of cardiovascular diseases
  • Patient Perceptions of Physician Burden in the Treatment of Chronic Pain, 2021, Journal of Pain

Chibnall has collaborated frequently with several researchers including Raymond C. Tait, Donna Kalauokalani, Suet To, Erick Messias, and Laura Burch. Among these, Raymond C. Tait is a prominent coauthor, having collaborated on multiple papers.

The scientist's research has appeared in a variety of publication venues, notably including:

  • Pain Medicine
  • Journal of Pain
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Archives of cardiovascular diseases
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia

Best Publications

  • The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties

    Raymond C. Tait;John T. Chibnall;Steven Krause

  • Appetite assessment: simple appetite questionnaire predicts weight loss in community-dwelling adults and nursing home residents

    Margaret-Mary G Wilson;David R Thomas;Laurence Z Rubenstein;John T Chibnall

  • Comparison of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination for Detecting Dementia and Mild Neurocognitive Disorder—A Pilot Study

    Syed H. Tariq;Nina Tumosa;John T. Chibnall;Mitchell H. Perry

  • An interdisciplinary expert consensus statement on assessment of pain in older persons

    Thomas Hadjistavropoulos;Keela Herr;Dennis C. Turk;Perry G. Fine

  • Medical student mental health 3.0: improving student wellness through curricular changes.

    Stuart J. Slavin;Debra L. Schindler;John T. Chibnall

  • The Pain Disability Index: Factor structure and normative data

    John T. Chibnall;Raymond C. Tait

  • Pain assessment in cognitively impaired and unimpaired older adults: a comparison of four scales.

    John T. Chibnall;Raymond C. Tait

  • Provider judgments of patients in pain: seeking symptom certainty.

    Raymond C. Tait;John T. Chibnall;Donna Kalauokalani

  • Racial/ethnic disparities in the assessment and treatment of pain: psychosocial perspectives.

    Raymond C. Tait;John T. Chibnall

  • Physician judgments of chronic pain patients

    Raymond C. Tait;John T. Chibnall

  • Cerebral blood flow changes during vagus nerve stimulation for depression

    Charles R. Conway;Yvette I. Sheline;John T. Chibnall;Mark S. George

  • Psychosocial-spiritual correlates of death distress in patients with life-threatening medical conditions.

    John T Chibnall;Susan D Videen;Paul N Duckro;Douglas K Miller

  • Relationship between social desirability and self-report in chronic pain patients.

    Teresa L. Deshields;Raymond C. Tait;Jeffrey D. Gfeller;John T. Chibnall

  • Development of a brief version of the Survey of Pain Attitudes.

    Raymond C. Tait;John T Chibnall

  • Effect of Acetaminophen on Behavior, Well‐Being, and Psychotropic Medication Use in Nursing Home Residents with Moderate‐to‐Severe Dementia

    John T. Chibnall;Raymond C. Tait;Bonnie Harman;Rebecca A. Luebbert

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder in chronic post-traumatic headache patients.

    John T. Chibnall;Paul N. Duckro

  • Finding the Why, Changing the How: Improving the Mental Health of Medical Students, Residents, and Physicians.

    Stuart J. Slavin;John T. Chibnall

  • The Effects of Medical Evidence and Pain Intensity on Medical Student Judgments of Chronic Pain Patients

    John T. Chibnall;Raymond C. Tait;Lisa R. Ross

  • Confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in African American and Caucasian Workers' Compensation claimants with low back injuries.

    John T. Chibnall;Raymond C. Tait

  • Impact of exogenous testosterone on mood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

    Hamid R Amanatkar;John T Chibnall;Byung-Woun Seo;Jothika N Manepalli

  • Supportive-affective group experience for persons with life-threatening illness: reducing spiritual, psychological, and death-related distress in dying patients.

    Douglas K. Miller;John T. Chibnall;Susan D. Videen;Paul N. Duckro

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Mintun
Mark A. Mintun University of Pennsylvania
Yvette I. Sheline
Yvette I. Sheline University of Pennsylvania
Jillon S. Vander Wal
Jillon S. Vander Wal Saint Louis University
Joseph L. Price
Joseph L. Price Washington University in St. Louis
John E. Morley
John E. Morley Saint Louis University
Mark S. George
Mark S. George Medical University of South Carolina
Henry A. Nasrallah
Henry A. Nasrallah University of Cincinnati
Laurence Z. Rubenstein
Laurence Z. Rubenstein University of Oklahoma
Donald W. Black
Donald W. Black University of Iowa
Michael D. Mumford
Michael D. Mumford University of Oklahoma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens a range of career pathways, especially in helping professions like social work. Many students combine online psychology degrees with social work studies, creating flexible and versatile qualifications for the workforce.

If you are considering this path, it's important to understand that each state sets its own requirements for social workers. For example, becoming a social worker in Ohio and requirements to be a social worker in Oklahoma both involve specific educational qualifications, licensing exams, and field experience. These requirements can differ significantly depending on where you wish to practice.

States like Oregon and Pennsylvania have their own regulations as well. If you are interested in becoming a social worker in Oregon or want to learn more about Pennsylvania social work education requirements, it’s important to research coursework and licensing steps for each location. Online psychology and social work degrees often make it easier to meet these diverse requirements, letting you tailor your education to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing John T. Chibnall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles