World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
66350
World Ranking
7786
National Ranking
4057

Mark A. Mintun publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Mintun sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 287 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark A. Mintun D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Mintun sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Mintun is a researcher affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. The primary focus of their scientific work revolves around the study of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and cognitive impairment, with significant contributions to understanding and developing treatments for these conditions.

Their research spans the field of medicine, with key subfields including psychiatry and mental health, physiology, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. This multidisciplinary approach supports a comprehensive exploration of neurodegenerative diseases and brain function.

Mark A. Mintun has published extensively on topics such as Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, dementia and cognitive impairment research, functional brain connectivity studies, health systems and economic evaluations related to quality of life, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, medical imaging techniques, and the role of cholinesterase in neurodegenerative diseases.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Nature Communications
  • Scientific Reports
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Neurology

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • John C. Morris
  • Adam Fleisher
  • Sonia Pawluczyk
  • Clifford R. Jack
  • Michael Donohue

Among their notable recent publications are:

  • "Donanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease," 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease," 2023, JAMA
  • "Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [18F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes," 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • "A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Nature Medicine

Best Publications

  • Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) : use of a cluster-size threshold

    Steven D. Forman;Jonathan D. Cohen;Mark Fitzgerald;William F. Eddy

  • Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing

    Steven E. Petersen;P. T. Fox;Michael I. Posner;M. Mintun

  • Molecular, Structural, and Functional Characterization of Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for a Relationship between Default Activity, Amyloid, and Memory

    Randy L. Buckner;Abraham Z. Snyder;Benjamin J. Shannon;Gina LaRossa

  • Brain Work and Brain Imaging

    Marcus E Raichle;Mark A Mintun

  • Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands

    Robert B. Innis;Vincent Joseph Cunningham;Jacques Delforge;Masahiro Fujita

  • Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity

    Peter T. Fox;Marcus E. Raichle;Mark A. Mintun;Carmen Dence

  • Depression Duration But Not Age Predicts Hippocampal Volume Loss in Medically Healthy Women with Recurrent Major Depression

    Yvette I. Sheline;Milan Sanghavi;Mark A. Mintun;Mokhtar H. Gado

  • Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET

    John Jonides;Edward E. Smith;Robert A. Koeppe;Edward Awh

  • The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression

    Yvette I. Sheline;M Deanna;Joseph L. Price;Melissa M. Rundle

  • Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of singe words

    Steven E. Petersen;Peter T. Fox;Michael I. Posner;Mark Mintun

  • Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans.

    Anne M. Fagan;Mark A. Mintun;Robert H. Mach;Sang-Yoon Lee

  • Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: an fMRI study

    Yvette I. Sheline;M Deanna;Julie M. Donnelly;John M. Ollinger

  • Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus

    Yvette I. Sheline;Joseph L. Price;Zhizi Yan;Mark A. Mintun

  • Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation.

    M. E. Raichle;W. R. W. Martin;P. Herscovitch;M. A. Mintun

  • Use of Florbetapir-PET for Imaging β-Amyloid Pathology

    Christopher M. Clark;Julie A. Schneider;Barry J. Bedell;Thomas G. Beach

  • [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease.

    M. A. Mintun;G. N. LaRossa;Y. I. Sheline;C. S. Dence

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • A quantitative model for the in vivo assessment of drug binding sites with positron emission tomography.

    Mark A. Mintun;Marcus E. Raichle;Michael R. Kilbourn;G. Frederick Wooten

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid tau/β-Amyloid42 Ratio as a Prediction of Cognitive Decline in Nondemented Older Adults

    Anne M. Fagan;Catherine M. Roe;Chengjie Xiong;Mark A. Mintun

  • APOE predicts amyloid-beta but not tau Alzheimer pathology in cognitively normal aging

    John C. Morris;Catherine M. Roe;Chengjie Xiong;Anne M. Fagan

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Morris
John C. Morris Washington University in St. Louis
Michael J. Pontecorvo
Michael J. Pontecorvo Eli Lilly (United States)
Michael D. Devous
Michael D. Devous Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Marcus E. Raichle
Marcus E. Raichle Washington University in St. Louis
Yvette I. Sheline
Yvette I. Sheline University of Pennsylvania
Adam S. Fleisher
Adam S. Fleisher Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Marwan N. Sabbagh
Marwan N. Sabbagh Lou Ruvo Brain Institute
David M. Holtzman
David M. Holtzman Washington University in St. Louis
Anne M. Fagan
Anne M. Fagan Washington University in St. Louis
Eric M. Reiman
Eric M. Reiman Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in the medical field, there are several flexible pathways to advance your career online. For aspiring healthcare administrators, exploring the top cahme-accredited mha programs can lead to leadership roles in hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Registered nurses looking to expand their qualifications may consider earning a BSN, and there are options such as rn to bsn with no clinicals—perfect for those seeking academic advancement without additional hands-on requirements.

For nurses aiming for the highest level of clinical practice, pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a popular choice. There are now comprehensive online dnp programs that offer flexibility for working professionals. You might also be interested in the shortest dnp program options, which can expedite your pathway to advanced clinical roles and academic leadership.

These diverse online routes make it easier than ever to reach your healthcare career goals, regardless of where you’re starting from.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Mintun

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles