World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
132
Citations
83259
World Ranking
2281
National Ranking
1289

Neuroscience

D-Index
132
Citations
83228
World Ranking
263
National Ranking
162

Mark P. Jensen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark P. Jensen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 853 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark P. Jensen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark P. Jensen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark P. Jensen is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on Chemistry and Medicine, as reflected in their publication record. Within these areas, they concentrate particularly on subfields such as Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Pharmacology, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Nuclear Materials and Properties
  • Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
  • Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect

Mark P. Jensen has contributed to multiple frequent publication venues, notably:

  • Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Radiochimica Acta
  • ACS Omega
  • PAIN Reports

The scientist collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Jenifer C. Shafer
  • Kevin J. Pastoor
  • Gabriela A. Picayo
  • Shubham Vyas
  • Aaron Unger

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Mark P. Jensen include:

  • "Sulfur donating extractants for the separation of trivalent actinides and lanthanides," 2020, Coordination Chemistry Reviews
  • "Progress in Uranium Chemistry: Driving Advances in Front-End Nuclear Fuel Cycle Forensics," 2021, Inorganic Chemistry
  • "Characterization of the ALSEP Process at Equilibrium: Speciation and Stoichiometry of the Extracted Complex," 2020, ACS Omega
  • "Electrochemistry of PUREX: R is for reduction and ion transfer," 2021, Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange
  • "Adjunctive use of hypnosis for clinical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2024, PAIN Reports

Best Publications

  • Topical Review and RecommendationsCore outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

    Robert H. Dworkin;Dennis C. Turk;John T. Farrar;Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite

  • The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

    Mark P. Jensen;Paul Karoly;Sanford Braver

  • Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

    Dennis C Turk;Robert H Dworkin;Robert R Allen;Nicholas Bellamy

  • Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations

    Robert H. Dworkin;Dennis C. Turk;Kathleen W. Wyrwich;Dorcas Beaton

  • Validity of four pain intensity rating scales

    Maria Alexandra Ferreira-Valente;José Luís Pais-Ribeiro;Mark P. Jensen

  • Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults.

    Mark P. Jensen;Paul Karoly

  • Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain.

    Gabriel Tan;Gabriel Tan;Mark P. Jensen;John I. Thornby;Bilal F. Shanti;Bilal F. Shanti

  • Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain.

    Mark P. Jensen;Mark P. Jensen;Connie Chen;Andrew M. Brugger

  • Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.

    Mark P Jensen;Judith A Turner;Judith A Turner;Joan M Romano;Joan M Romano;Lloyd D Fisher

  • Coping with chronic pain: A critical review of the literature.

    Mark P. Jensen;Judith A. Turner;Joan M. Romano;Paul Karoly

  • Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference

    Dagmar Amtmann;Karon F. Cook;Mark P. Jensen;Wen Hung Chen

  • Development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic pain The Neuropathic Pain Scale

    Bradley S. Galer;Mark P. Jensen

  • Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients

    Mark P. Jensen;Candace A. McFarland

  • Painful diabetic polyneuropathy: epidemiology, pain description, and quality of life.

    Bradley S. Galer;Ann Gianas;Mark P. Jensen

  • What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement

    Mark P. Jensen;Judith A. Turner;Joan M. Romano

  • Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research.

    Michael Von Korff;Michael Von Korff;Mark P. Jensen;Paul Karoly

  • Do beliefs, coping, and catastrophizing independently predict functioning in patients with chronic pain?

    Judith A. Turner;Mark P. Jensen;Joan M. Romano

  • The impact of neuropathic pain on health-related quality of life: Review and implications

    Mark P. Jensen;Marci J. Chodroff;Robert H. Dworkin

  • The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?

    Ivan S K Thong;Mark P Jensen;Jordi Miró;Gabriel Tan

  • Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation.

    Dawn M. Ehde;Joseph M. Czerniecki;Douglas G. Smith;Kellye M. Campbell

  • Changes in beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment.

    Mark P. Jensen;Judith A. Turner;Joan M. Romano

Frequent Co-Authors

Dawn M. Ehde
Dawn M. Ehde University of Washington
Judith A. Turner
Judith A. Turner University of Washington
Bradley S. Galer
Bradley S. Galer Endo Pharmaceuticals (United States)
Paul Karoly
Paul Karoly Arizona State University
Dagmar Amtmann
Dagmar Amtmann University of Washington
Robert D. Kerns
Robert D. Kerns Yale University
Robert H. Dworkin
Robert H. Dworkin University of Rochester Medical Center
Dennis C. Turk
Dennis C. Turk University of Washington
Francis J. Keefe
Francis J. Keefe Duke University
Beverly E. Thorn
Beverly E. Thorn University of Alabama

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark P. Jensen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles