World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
68
Citations
25063
World Ranking
2708
National Ranking
1266

Joseph A. Maldjian publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph A. Maldjian sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 247 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Joseph A. Maldjian D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph A. Maldjian sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets

    Joseph A. Maldjian;Paul J. Laurienti;Robert A. Kraft;Jonathan H. Burdette

  • Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas.

    Joseph A Maldjian;Paul J Laurienti;Jonathan H Burdette

  • Decreased gray matter concentration in the insular, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal cortices of cocaine patients

    Teresa R Franklin;Paul D Acton;Joseph A Maldjian;Jason D Gray

  • An fMRI Study of Facial Emotion Processing in Patients With Schizophrenia

    Raquel E. Gur;Claire McGrath;Robin M. Chan;Lee Schroeder

  • Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling

    Julio A. Chalela;David C. Alsop;Julio B. Gonzalez-Atavales;Joseph A. Maldjian

  • Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study.

    Daniel D. Langleben;Lee Schroeder;Joseph A. Maldjian;Ruben C. Gur

  • Effects of intensive glucose lowering on brain structure and function in people with type 2 diabetes (ACCORD MIND): A randomised open-label substudy

    Lenore J. Launer;Michael E. Miller;Jeff D. Williamson;Ron M. Lazar

  • Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults

    Paul J. Laurienti;Jonathan H. Burdette;Joseph A. Maldjian;Mark T. Wallace

  • An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and a spatial task.

    Ruben C. Gur;David Alsop;David Glahn;Richard Petty

  • Brain activation during facial emotion processing.

    Ruben C. Gur;Lee Schroeder;Travis Turner;Claire McGrath

  • Age-related differences in brain activation during emotional face processing

    Faith M. Gunning-Dixon;Ruben C. Gur;Alexis C. Perkins;Lee Schroeder

  • Arterial spin-labeling in routine clinical practice, part 1: technique and artifacts.

    A. R. Deibler;J. M. Pollock;R. A. Kraft;H. Tan

  • Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance

    Paul J. Laurienti;Robert A. Kraft;Joseph A. Maldjian;Jonathan H. Burdette

  • Biological parametric mapping: A statistical toolbox for multimodality brain image analysis

    Ramon Casanova;Ryali Srikanth;Aaron H. Baer;Paul J. Laurienti

  • Effects of Regular and Long-Acting Insulin on Cognition and Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers: A Pilot Clinical Trial

    Suzanne Craft;Amy Claxton;Laura D. Baker;Angela J. Hanson

  • The Effect of Brain Tumors on BOLD Functional MR Imaging Activation in the Adjacent Motor Cortex: Implications for Image-guided Neurosurgery

    Andrei I. Holodny;Michael Schulder;Wen-Ching Liu;Jonathan Wolko

  • Arterial transit time imaging with flow encoding arterial spin tagging (FEAST)

    Jiongjiong Wang;David C. Alsop;Hee Kwon Song;Joseph A. Maldjian

  • Traumatic Brain Injury: Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Findings

    Amon Y. Liu;Joseph A. Maldjian;Linda J. Bagley;Grant P. Sinson

  • Functional image-guided surgery of intracranial tumors located in or near the sensorimotor cortex

    Michael Schulder;Joseph A Maldjian;Wen Ching Liu;Andrei I. Holodny

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of regional brain activity in patients with intracerebral gliomas: findings and implications for clinical management.

    Scott W. Atlas;Robert S. Howard;Joseph A Maldjian;David Alsop

  • Arterial Spin-Labeled MR Perfusion Imaging: Clinical Applications

    Jeffrey M. Pollock;Huan Tan;Robert A. Kraft;Christopher T. Whitlow

  • Abnormal white matter integrity related to head impact exposure in a season of high school varsity football.

    Elizabeth M. Davenport;Elizabeth M. Davenport;Christopher T. Whitlow;Jillian E. Urban;Jillian E. Urban;Mark A. Espeland

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel D. Stitzel
Joel D. Stitzel Wake Forest University
David C. Alsop
David C. Alsop Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Barry I. Freedman
Barry I. Freedman Wake Forest University
John A. Detre
John A. Detre University of Pennsylvania
Paul J. Laurienti
Paul J. Laurienti Wake Forest University
Donald W. Bowden
Donald W. Bowden Wake Forest University
Jeff D. Williamson
Jeff D. Williamson Wake Forest University
Baowei Fei
Baowei Fei The University of Texas at Dallas
Mark A. Espeland
Mark A. Espeland Wake Forest University
Nicholette D. Palmer
Nicholette D. Palmer Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider related fields in mental health and human services, many of which offer flexible online learning options. For those interested in supporting individuals and families, pursuing a marriage and family therapy degree online can be a strategic next step. This pathway equips graduates with the skills to work in therapy settings, making a direct impact on mental wellness.

Psychology remains one of the most popular allied disciplines. If affordability is a concern, students can research the cheapest online master's degree in psychology for advanced study or explore how much is a psychology degree to compare undergraduate and graduate program costs. Understanding these financial considerations can help students plan their educational journey effectively.

Another common career progression is in social work. For those drawn to clinical or advocacy roles, enrolling in one of the msw degree programs with lower barriers to entry can open doors to a range of fulfilling professions. Whether you choose neuroscience or a related online degree, diverse career opportunities await.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph A. Maldjian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles