World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
37
Citations
6731
World Ranking
8302
National Ranking
2294

Joel D. Stitzel publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel D. Stitzel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 235 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Joel D. Stitzel D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel D. Stitzel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Best Publications

  • Controlled fabrication of a biological vascular substitute.

    Joel Stitzel;Jie Liu;Jie Liu;Sang Jin Lee;Makoto Komura

  • Investigation of Traumatic Brain Injuries Using the Next Generation of Simulated Injury Monitor (SIMon) Finite Element Head Model

    Erik G Takhounts;Stephen A Ridella;Vikas Hasija;Rabih E Tannous

  • In vitro evaluation of electrospun nanofiber scaffolds for vascular graft application.

    Sang Jin Lee;James J. Yoo;Grace J. Lim;Anthony Atala

  • Head impact exposure in youth football: Elementary school ages 9-12 years and the effect of practice structure

    Bryan R. Cobb;Jillian E. Urban;Elizabeth M. Davenport;Steven Rowson

  • Co-electrospun dual scaffolding system with potential for muscle–tendon junction tissue engineering

    Mitchell R. Ladd;Sang Jin Lee;Sang Jin Lee;Joel D. Stitzel;Joel D. Stitzel;Anthony Atala

  • Cyclic Mechanical Preconditioning Improves Engineered Muscle Contraction

    Du Geon Moon;George Christ;Joel D. Stitzel;Anthony Atala

  • Material properties of human rib cortical bone from dynamic tension coupon testing.

    Andrew R. Kemper;Craig McNally;Eric A. Kennedy;Sarah J. Manoogian

  • Development of a full body CAD dataset for computational modeling: a multi-modality approach

    F. S. Gayzik;D. P. Moreno;C. P. Geer;S. D. Wuertzer

  • Subconcussive Head Impact Exposure and White Matter Tract Changes over a Single Season of Youth Football.

    Naeim Bahrami;Dev Sharma;Scott Rosenthal;Elizabeth M. Davenport;Elizabeth M. Davenport

  • Arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation on a novel biomimicking, biodegradable vascular graft scaffold.

    Joel D. Stitzel;Kristin J. Pawlowski;Gary E. Wnek;David G. Simpson

  • A nonlinear finite element model of the eye with experimental validation for the prediction of globe rupture.

    Joel D. Stitzel;Stefan M. Duma;Joseph M. Cormier;Ian P. Herring

  • Lateral Impact Validation of a Geometrically Accurate Full Body Finite Element Model for Blunt Injury Prediction

    Nicholas A. Vavalle;Daniel P. Moreno;Ashley C. Rhyne;Joel D. Stitzel

  • Detection of American Football Head Impacts Using Biomechanical Features and Support Vector Machine Classification.

    Lyndia C. Wu;Calvin Kuo;Jesus Loza;Mehmet Kurt

  • Defining regional variation in the material properties of human rib cortical bone and its effect on fracture prediction

    Joel D. Stitzel;Joseph M. Cormier;Joseph T. Barretta;Eric A. Kennedy

  • Development of a Computationally Efficient Full Human Body Finite Element Model

    Doron Schwartz;Berkan Guleyupoglu;Bharath Koya;Joel D. Stitzel

  • Biomechanical Response of Human Liver in Tensile Loading

    Andrew R. Kemper;Anthony C. Santago;Joel D. Stitzel;Jessica L. Sparks

  • Cell scaffold matrices with incorporated therapeutic agents

    Anthony Atala;James Yoo;Grace Lim;Richard Czerw

  • Development and validation of an atlas-based finite element brain model

    Logan E. Miller;Jillian E. Urban;Joel D. Stitzel

  • Electrospun cell matrices

    Anthony Atala;James Yoo;Grace Lim;Richard Czerw

  • Modeling Brain Injury Response for Rotational Velocities of Varying Directions and Magnitudes

    Ashley A. Weaver;Kerry A. Danelson;Joel D. Stitzel

  • Advanced Age Diminishes Tendon-to-Bone Healing in a Rat Model of Rotator Cuff Repair

    Johannes F. Plate;Philip J. Brown;Jordan Walters;John A. Clark

  • Quantitative Validation of a Human Body Finite Element Model Using Rigid Body Impacts.

    Nicholas A. Vavalle;Matthew L. Davis;Joel D. Stitzel;F. Scott Gayzik

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph A. Maldjian
Joseph A. Maldjian The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
James J. Yoo
James J. Yoo Wake Forest University
Mark A. Espeland
Mark A. Espeland Wake Forest University
Anthony Atala
Anthony Atala Wake Forest University
Shay Soker
Shay Soker Wake Forest University
Sang Jin Lee
Sang Jin Lee Wake Forest University
Joseph J. Crisco
Joseph J. Crisco Brown University
Gary L. Bowlin
Gary L. Bowlin University of Memphis
Gary E. Wnek
Gary E. Wnek Case Western Reserve University
David G. Simpson
David G. Simpson Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your career options in Engineering and Technology often means exploring adjacent disciplines and flexible education formats. Numerous online programs now offer specialized, affordable, and accredited degrees that complement technical backgrounds or open up new career possibilities entirely.

For those interested in broadening their expertise to the business or management side, the cheapest aacsb online mba no gmat degrees allow engineering professionals to build leadership and business skills on a budget — all while skipping standardized test requirements. Alternatively, roles in project management or facility operations may benefit from the knowledge gained in online colleges for hospitality management.

If your interest lies in legal frameworks or compliance tied to technology, consider the value of aba accredited paralegal programs. These can provide foundational legal knowledge critical for intellectual property, contracts, or regulatory roles within engineering fields.

Finally, for those who want to advance into employee management or organizational leadership, a masters of human resources can be highly complementary, equipping you to recruit, train, and retain technical talent efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Joel D. Stitzel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles