World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jelte M. Wicherts

Jelte M. Wicherts

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
16659
World Ranking
3099
National Ranking
159

Jelte M. Wicherts publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jelte M. Wicherts sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jelte M. Wicherts D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jelte M. Wicherts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jelte M. Wicherts is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands, specializing in Decision Sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Safety Research.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Mental Health Research, Behavioral Health and Interventions, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Academic integrity and plagiarism, Psychometric Methodologies and Testing, and the Delphi Technique in Research.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Marcel A. L. M. van Assen, Marjan Bakker, Olmo R. van den Akker, Anton Olsson-Collentine, and Andrea H. Stoevenbelt.

Jelte M. Wicherts has published several recent papers, including:

  • Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022, PLoS ONE)
  • Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations (2020, PLoS Biology)
  • Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size (2020, Psychological Bulletin)
  • The dire disregard of measurement invariance testing in psychological science (2023, Psychological Methods)

The scholar has contributed frequently to several publication venues such as Royal Society Open Science, ResearchEquals, PLoS ONE, Psychological Methods, and Behavior Research Methods. These journals reflect the diversity and interdisciplinary nature of their research interests and fields of study.

Best Publications

  • A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism.

    Han L. J. Van Der Maas;Conor V. Dolan;Raoul P. P. P. Grasman;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science

    Marjan Bakker;Annette van Dijk;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology.

    Jens B. Asendorpf;Mark Conner;Filip de Fruyt;Jan De Houwer

  • Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking

    Jelte Wicherts;Coosje Lisabet Sterre Veldkamp;Hilde E. M. Augusteijn;Marjan Bakker

  • The Ordinal Effects of Ostracism: A Meta-Analysis of 120 Cyberball Studies

    Chris Hubertus Joseph Hartgerink;Ilja Van Beest;Jelte M Wicherts;Kipling D. Williams

  • The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis

    Jelte M. Wicherts;Denny Borsboom;Judith Kats;Dylan Molenaar

  • The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013).

    Michèle B. Nuijten;Chris H. J. Hartgerink;Marcel A. L. M. van Assen;Sacha Epskamp

  • Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results

    Jelte M. Wicherts;Marjan Bakker;Dylan Molenaar

  • The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals

    Marjan Bakker;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • Remission from post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long term outcome studies.

    Nexhmedin Morina;Jelte M. Wicherts;Jakob Lobbrecht;Stefan Priebe

  • Meta-analysis of psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder in adult survivors of childhood abuse

    Thomas Ehring;Renate Welboren;Nexhmedin Morina;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis

    Paulette C. Flore;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands

    Unknown

  • Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks.

    R. Hans Phaf;Sören E. Mohr;Mark Rotteveel;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • Are intelligence tests measurement invariant over time? Investigating the nature of the Flynn effect

    Jelte M. Wicherts;Conor V. Dolan;David J. Hessen;Paul Oosterveld

  • Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.

    Marcel A. L. M. van Assen;Robbie C. M. van Aert;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis.

    Robbie C. M. van Aert;Jelte M. Wicherts;Marcel A. L. M. van Assen;Marcel A. L. M. van Assen

  • Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean?

    Jakob Pietschnig;Jakob Pietschnig;Lars Penke;Jelte M. Wicherts;Michael Zeiler

  • Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the Type I error rate in independent samples t tests: the power of alternatives and recommendations.

    Marjan Bakker;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • Conducting meta-analyses based on p values : Reservations and recommendations for applying p-uniform and p-curve

    Robbie C. M. van Aert;Jelte M. Wicherts;Marcel A. L. M. van Assen;Marcel A. L. M. van Assen

  • Group differences in the heritability of items and test scores

    Jelte M. Wicherts;Wendy Johnson

  • [Review of: J.R. Flynn (2007) What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect]

    J.M. Wicherts

Frequent Co-Authors

Conor V. Dolan
Conor V. Dolan Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Denny Borsboom
Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam
Han L. J. van der Maas
Han L. J. van der Maas University of Amsterdam
Sacha Epskamp
Sacha Epskamp National University of Singapore
Rogier A. Kievit
Rogier A. Kievit Donders Institute
Martin Voracek
Martin Voracek University of Vienna
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Lourens J. Waldorp
Lourens J. Waldorp University of Amsterdam
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Johan Denollet
Johan Denollet Tilburg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens a variety of flexible and cost-effective options for aspiring professionals. Many students seek programs that fit their schedule and budget, making it crucial to compare offerings in different states. For those prioritizing speed, resources like fastest online psychology degrees in Washington and fastest online psychology degrees in Wisconsin provide valuable insights into accelerated paths that allow you to graduate quickly and start your career sooner.

Affordability is another key concern for many students. If reducing tuition costs is a priority, you can explore the affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in Colorado, as well as the affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in Florida. These programs help lower the financial barriers to entry and make quality education more accessible.

Completing an online psychology degree can lead to multiple career pathways, such as counseling, human resources, research, and social services. Whether your priority is speed or cost, exploring state-specific programs can help you find the best fit for your academic and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jelte M. Wicherts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles