World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
18450
World Ranking
2365
National Ranking
1377

Elliot M. Tucker-Drob publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot M. Tucker-Drob sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 215 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elliot M. Tucker-Drob D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot M. Tucker-Drob sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elliot M. Tucker-Drob is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a primary focus on genetics, molecular biology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their recent papers include significant contributions to the fields of cognitive functioning, genetic associations, and neurogenetics. Notable works are:

  • Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span, 2020, Gothic.net
  • Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects, 2022, Nature Genetics
  • Multivariate analysis of 1.5 million people identifies genetic associations with traits related to self-regulation and addiction, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Genetic architecture of 11 major psychiatric disorders at biobehavioral, functional genomic and molecular genetic levels of analysis, 2022, Nature Genetics

Tucker-Drob's frequent co-authors include:

  • K. Paige Harden (48 collaborations)
  • Andrew D. Grotzinger (42 collaborations)
  • Simon R. Cox (34 collaborations)
  • Travis T. Mallard (31 collaborations)
  • Ian J. Deary (31 collaborations)

Their research has been prominently published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 42 publications
  • Nature Human Behaviour (5 publications)
  • Human Brain Mapping (5 publications)
  • Nature Communications (4 publications)
  • Nature Genetics (4 publications)

Main fields of study include Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology with 135 publications, and Medicine with 65 publications. Their subfields of study highlight Genetics (84), Molecular Biology (51), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (38), Cognitive Neuroscience (29), and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (28).

The primary topics of their work cover:

  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (92 publications)
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (52 publications)
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing (50 publications)
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (46 publications)
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (36 publications)
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (30 publications)
  • Birth, Development, and Health (28 publications)

Best Publications

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span.

    Martin Lövdén;Martin Lövdén;Laura Fratiglioni;M Maria Glymour;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Genomic structural equation modelling provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits.

    Andrew D. Grotzinger;Mijke Rhemtulla;Ronald de Vlaming;Ronald de Vlaming;Stuart J. Ritchie

  • How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis

    Stuart J. Ritchie;Elliot M. Tucker-Drob

  • Ageing and brain white matter structure in 3,513 UK Biobank participants.

    Simon R. Cox;Stuart J. Ritchie;Elliot M. Tucker-Drob;David C. Liewald

  • Genetic and Environmental Continuity in Personality Development: A Meta-Analysis

    Daniel A. Briley;Elliot M. Tucker-Drob

  • Individual Differences in the Development of Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity During Adolescence: Further Evidence for a Dual Systems Model

    K. Paige Harden;Elliot M. Tucker-Drob

  • Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence

    Elliot M. Tucker-Drob;Timothy C. Bates

  • Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses

    Ben Brumpton;Ben Brumpton;Eleanor Sanderson;Karl Heilbron;Fernando Pires Hartwig;Fernando Pires Hartwig

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on Cognition Across Development and Context

    Elliot M. Tucker-Drob;Daniel A. Briley;K. Paige Harden

  • Differentiation of Cognitive Abilities across the Life Span.

    Elliot M. Tucker-Drob

  • The cognitive reserve hypothesis: A longitudinal examination of age-associated declines in reasoning and processing speed.

    Elliot M. Tucker-Drob;Kathy E. Johnson;Richard N. Jones

  • Associations between vascular risk factors and brain MRI indices in UK Biobank

    Simon R Cox;Donald M Lyall;Stuart J Ritchie;Stuart J Ritchie;Mark E Bastin

  • Multivariate analysis of 1.5 million people identifies genetic associations with traits related to self-regulation and addiction.

    Richard Karlsson Linnér;Travis T Mallard;Peter B Barr;Sandra Sanchez-Roige;Sandra Sanchez-Roige

  • Investigating the genetic architecture of noncognitive skills using GWAS-by-subtraction.

    Perline A. Demange;Perline A. Demange;Margherita Malanchini;Margherita Malanchini;Margherita Malanchini;Travis T. Mallard;Pietro Biroli

  • Genetic and environmental effects on body mass index from infancy to the onset of adulthood: an individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts participating in the COllaborative project of Development of Anthropometrical measures in Twins (CODATwins) study

    Karri Silventoinen;Karri Silventoinen;Aline Jelenkovic;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Yoon-Mi Hur

  • Continuity of genetic and environmental influences on cognition across the life span: a meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies.

    Elliot M. Tucker-Drob;Daniel A. Briley

  • Emergence of a Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Infant Mental Ability Between 10 Months and 2 Years

    Elliot M. Tucker-Drob;Mijke Rhemtulla;Mijke Rhemtulla;K. Paige Harden;Eric Turkheimer

  • Genetic and environmental influences on height from infancy to early adulthood: An individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts

    Aline Jelenkovic;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Yoon Mi Hur;Yoshie Yokoyama

  • Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence

    Timothy A. Salthouse;Jeffrey E. Pink;Elliot M. Tucker-Drob

  • Genome wide meta-analysis identifies genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders

    Lee Ph;Anttila;Won H

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Paige Harden
K. Paige Harden The University of Texas at Austin
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Daniel A. Briley
Daniel A. Briley University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jennifer L. Tackett
Jennifer L. Tackett Northwestern University
Karri Silventoinen
Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki
Mark E. Bastin
Mark E. Bastin University of Edinburgh
Jaakko Kaprio
Jaakko Kaprio University of Helsinki
Catherine Tuvblad
Catherine Tuvblad Örebro University
Michel G. Nivard
Michel G. Nivard University of Bristol
Andrew M. McIntosh
Andrew M. McIntosh University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to various online degrees and rewarding career pathways in mental health and counseling. Many students pursue bachelor's or master's degrees in psychology, counseling, or related fields to create a solid foundation for professional growth.

For those interested in becoming a licensed therapist, the requirements can vary by state and city. Understanding Madison licensed therapist requirements is an important step if you plan to practice in Wisconsin. Similarly, there are unique processes to follow if you are interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Memphis or want to understand Mesa licensed therapist education requirements for Arizona.

In addition, future therapists should be aware of local regulations such as licensed therapist requirements in Miami, which cover academic credentials, supervised practice, and examination processes. Researching these pathways will help you choose the right online psychology program tailored to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Elliot M. Tucker-Drob

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles