World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
30
Citations
3584
World Ranking
3743
National Ranking
1976

Roberto G. Quercia publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto G. Quercia sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 94 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Roberto G. Quercia D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto G. Quercia sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roberto G. Quercia is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with particular focus on several interrelated subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Finance, and Accounting.

The main topics that Roberto G. Quercia addresses in their work center on Housing Market and Economics, Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism, Spatial and Panel Data Analysis, and Financial Literacy, Pension, and Retirement Analysis. These topics are reflected consistently across their recent publications.

Quercia's recent papers illustrate these research interests and include the following:

  • Where Has All the Housing Gone? (2024), published in Housing Policy Debate
  • Does Temporary Mortgage Assistance for Unemployed Homeowners Reduce Longer Term Mortgage Default? An Analysis of the Hardest Hit Fund Program (2020), published in SSRN Electronic Journal

Additionally, works associated with collaborators or closely linked research include:

  • Does Temporary Mortgage Assistance for Unemployed Homeowners Reduce Longer-Term Mortgage Default? An Analysis of the Hardest Hit Fund Program (2022), published in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
  • The impact of low- and moderate-wealth homeownership on parental attitudes and behavior: Evidence from the community advantage panel (2020), published by UNC Libraries
  • Revisiting the subprime crisis: The dual mortgage market and mortgage defaults by race and ethnicity (2025), also published by UNC Libraries

Frequent publication venues where Roberto G. Quercia's work appears include UNC Libraries, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Housing Policy Debate, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Roberto G. Quercia collaborates regularly with a number of coauthors, among whom the most frequent are Stephanie Moulton, Yung Chun, Stephanie Casey Pierce, Sarah Riley, and Holly Holtzen. Each of these collaborators has coauthored at least two papers.

Best Publications

  • Residential Mortgage Default: A Review of the Literature*

    Roberto G. Quercia;Michael A. Stegman

  • Identifying neighborhood thresholds: An empirical exploration

    George C. Galster;Roberto G. Quercia;Alvaro Cortes

  • The Value Impact of New Residential Construction and Neighborhood Disinvestment on Residential Sales Price

    Robert Simons;Roberto Quercia;Ivan Levin

  • The impact of predatory loan terms on subprime foreclosures: The special case of prepayment penalties and balloon payments

    Roberto G. Quercia;Michael A. Stegman;Walter R. Davis

  • The impacts of affordable lending efforts on homeownership rates

    Roberto G. Quercia;George W. McCarthy;Susan M. Wachter

  • Threshold Effects and Neighborhood Change

    Roberto G. Quercia;George C. Galster

  • Risky Borrowers or Risky Mortgages Disaggregating Effects Using Propensity Score Models

    Lei Ding;Roberto G. Quercia;Wei Li;Janneke Ratcliffe

  • Urban containment and central-city revitalization

    Arthur C. Nelson;Raymond J. Burby;Edward Feser;Casey J. Dawkins

  • The Fortunes of Poor Neighborhoods

    George C. Galster;Roberto G. Quercia;Alvaro Cortes;Ron Malega

  • Friends and neighbors: Homeownership and social capital among low- to moderate-income families

    Kim Manturuk;Mark Lindblad;Roberto Quercia

  • Sense of community and informal social control among lower income households: the role of homeownership and collective efficacy in reducing subjective neighborhood crime and disorder

    Mark R. Lindblad;Kim R. Manturuk;Roberto G. Quercia

  • The challenges facing public housing authorities in a brave new world

    Roberto G. Quercia;George C. Galster

  • Threshold effects and the expected benefits of attracting middle‐income households to the central city

    Roberto G. Quercia;George C. Galster

  • Homeownership counseling performance: How can it be measured?

    Roberto G. Quercia;Susan M. Wachter

  • HOMEOWNERSHIP AND NEIGHBORHOOD SATISFACTION AMONG LOW‐ AND MODERATE‐INCOME HOUSEHOLDS

    Michal Grinstein‐Weiss;Yeong Yeo;Katrin Anacker;Shannon Van Zandt

  • Assessing the Impact of North Carolina's Predatory Lending Law

    Roberto G. Quercia;Michael A. Stegman;Walter R. Davis

  • Homeownership and Civic Engagement in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Kim Manturuk;Mark Lindblad;Roberto Quercia

  • Revisiting the subprime crisis: The dual mortgage market and mortgage defaults by race and ethnicity

    Carolina K. Reid;Debbie Bocian;Wei Li;Roberto G. Quercia

  • Spatio-Temporal Measurement of House Price Appreciation in Underserved Areas

    Roberto Quercia;George McCarthy;Rhonda Ryznar;Ayşe Can Talen

  • Does homeownership counseling affect the prepayment and default behavior of affordable mortgage borrowers

    Roberto Quercia;Jonathan Spader

Frequent Co-Authors

William M. Rohe
William M. Rohe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
George Galster
George Galster Wayne State University
Asad J. Khattak
Asad J. Khattak University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Susan M. Wachter
Susan M. Wachter University of Pennsylvania
Arthur C. Nelson
Arthur C. Nelson University of Arizona
Raymond J. Burby
Raymond J. Burby University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can be an effective way to tailor your education to specific career goals in Economics and Finance. Today, affordable choices abound, such as the best online mba under 25k, offering valuable business foundations without high tuition costs. If you’re interested in verifying a program’s quality, consider the online mba aacsb, which ensures the degree meets rigorous accreditation standards.

Economics and Finance graduates often branch into related fields. For instance, digital marketing roles are increasingly popular for those eager to combine analytical skills with creativity—pursuing a social media marketing degree online can open doors in this fast-growing industry. Hospitality is another thriving sector where finance and business skills are essential; studying at online colleges for hospitality management can lead to opportunities in hotels, tourism, and event planning.

With the flexibility of online programs, students can upskill or change career paths in less time and at a lower cost while building valuable connections and experience for the global workplace.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto G. Quercia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles