World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 71 447 399 300 263 435 16579

Rodolfo M. Nayga publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rodolfo M. Nayga between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rodolfo M. Nayga published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2021. 37 of the 526 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2021. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 16 publications
1990 2025

526 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rodolfo M. Nayga: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 4
1992 3
1993 4
1994 10
1995 14
1996 14
1997 8
1998 4
1999 13
2000 7
2001 4
2002 6
2003 10
2004 7
2005 12
2006 16
2007 9
2008 10
2009 25
2010 11
2011 23
2012 24
2013 21
2014 19
2015 21
2016 18
2017 19
2018 28
2019 18
2020 19
2021 40
2022 23
2023 24
2024 21
2025 16
Total 526
Download as CSV

Rodolfo M. Nayga publications per year - data summary

  • Rodolfo M. Nayga, a Economics and Finance scholar from Texas A&M University, has 526 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 40 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1990, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 14.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 14.6 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 124 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2001: 86 publications (7.2 per year); 2002-2013: 174 publications (14.5 per year); 2014-2025: 266 publications (22.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Rodolfo M. Nayga publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodolfo M. Nayga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 432–436 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 435 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9 435
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Rodolfo M. Nayga publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Rodolfo M. Nayga, a Economics and Finance scholar from Texas A&M University, records 435 publications - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Rodolfo M. Nayga, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Rodolfo M. Nayga ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Rodolfo M. Nayga D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodolfo M. Nayga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21 71
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Rodolfo M. Nayga D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Rodolfo M. Nayga, a Economics and Finance scholar from Texas A&M University, records 71 D-Index - the 89th percentile of the discipline.
  • 89% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Rodolfo M. Nayga, and about 11% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Rodolfo M. Nayga ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Rodolfo M. Nayga is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research primarily spans economics, marketing, public health, and plant science, demonstrating an interdisciplinary approach within the agricultural and applied economics domain.

The scientist's recent published papers include:

  • The association between food insecurity and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021, BMC Public Health)
  • Impact of Covid-19 on Household Food Waste: The Case of Italy (2020, Frontiers in Nutrition)
  • Labor Issues in the Food Supply Chain Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy)
  • Sustainability-Related Food Labels (2020, Annual Review of Resource Economics)
  • On the stability of risk and time preferences amid the COVID-19 pandemic (2021, Experimental Economics)

Frequent coauthors in Nayga's work include:

  • Michael R. Thomsen
  • Di Fang
  • Andreas C. Drichoutis
  • Marco A. Palma
  • Grant West

Publication venues where Nayga has contributed extensively are:

  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials

Their research covers a broad range of interconnected fields and subfields, involving economics and econometrics, marketing, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as plant science.

Main topics central to their research activity include:

  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

Best Publications

  • Consumers' Use of Nutritional Labels: A Review of Research Studies and Issues

    Andreas C. Drichoutis;Panagiotis Lazaridis;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • Consumers' willingness to pay for organic chicken breast: Evidence from choice experiment

    Ellen J. Van Loo;Vincenzina Caputo;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Jean Francois Meullenet

  • Nutrition knowledge and consumer use of nutritional food labels

    Andreas C. Drichoutis;Panagiotis Lazaridis;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat

    Ellen J. Van Loo;Vincenzina Caputo;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Wim Verbeke

  • Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes

    Ellen J. Van Loo;Vincenzina Caputo;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Han Seok Seo

  • Consumers' valuation of food quality labels: The case of the European geographic indication and organic farming labels

    Maria Carmela Aprile;Vincenzina Caputo;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • The Demand for Food Away from Home: Full-Service or Fast Food?

    Hayden Stewart;Noel Blisard;Sanjib Bhuyan;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • The Effect of Food Label Use on Nutrient Intakes: An Endogenous Switching Regression Analysis

    Sung Yong Kim;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Oral Capps

  • Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food

    Carola Grebitus;Jayson L. Lusk;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • The association between food insecurity and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Di Fang;Michael R. Thomsen;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • Consumers’ Preferences and Attitudes Toward Local Food Products

    Maria Carmela Aprile;Vincenzina Caputo;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • Determinants of Consumers' Use of Nutritional Information on Food Packages

    Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments

    Lynn Van Wezemael;Vincenzina Caputo;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Rodolfo M. Nayga;George Chryssochoidis

  • Effect of organic poultry purchase frequency on consumer attitudes toward organic poultry meat

    Ellen Van Loo;Vincenzina Caputo;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Jean Francois Meullenet

  • CRISPR versus GMOs: Public acceptance and valuation

    Aaron M. Shew;L. Lanier Nalley;Heather A. Snell;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • Consumers' Use of Nutritional Labels While Food Shopping and At Home

    Unknown

  • On the Use of Honesty Priming Tasks to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments

    Tiziana de-Magistris;Azucena Gracia;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • Consumers' valuation of nutritional information: A choice experiment study

    Azucena Gracia;Maria L. Loureiro;Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study

    Vincenzina Caputo;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Riccardo Scarpa;Riccardo Scarpa

  • Sociodemographic Influences on Consumer Concern for Food Safety: The Case of Irradiation, Antibiotics, Hormones, and Pesticides

    Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • Schooling, health knowledge and obesity

    Rodolfo M. Nayga

  • A theoretical and empirical investigation of nutritional label use.

    Andreas C. Drichoutis;Panagiotis Lazaridis;Rodolfo M. Nayga;Maria Kapsokefalou

  • A cold chain network for food exports to developing countries

    Victoria Salin;Rodolfo M. Nayga

Frequent Co-Authors

Oral Capps
Oral Capps Texas A&M University
Jayson L. Lusk
Jayson L. Lusk Oklahoma State University
Maria L. Loureiro
Maria L. Loureiro University of Santiago de Compostela
Riccardo Scarpa
Riccardo Scarpa Durham University
Wim Verbeke
Wim Verbeke Ghent University
Wuyang Hu
Wuyang Hu The Ohio State University
Jose Maria Gil
Jose Maria Gil Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Jutta Roosen
Jutta Roosen Technical University of Munich
Steven T. Yen
Steven T. Yen National Taiwan University
Steven C. Ricke
Steven C. Ricke University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in Economics and Finance can be highly rewarding, and there are diverse online degree options that complement this field. For those interested in shaping teams and driving organizational success, consider pursuing a master's organizational leadership online degree. This program strengthens your leadership and strategic planning skills, which are vital in the modern workplace.

If your passion lies with data analytics and decision-making, a masters in business intelligence could open doors to high-demand roles in data-driven industries. Business intelligence skills are especially valuable for careers in financial planning and market analysis.

For a broader business foundation, many students opt for the MBA. There are now flexible options like the best online mba no gmat programs, which waive standardized tests for qualified applicants. If affordability is a concern, check out an online mba under 30000 to maximize your return on investment.

Each of these pathways offers unique career advantages and can help you stand out in the competitive world of Economics and Finance.

Best Scientists Citing Rodolfo M. Nayga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles