World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 45 3914 3612 103 92 230 7521

Jutta Roosen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jutta Roosen between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jutta Roosen published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2011. 19 of the 279 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2011. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 5 publications
1997 2025

279 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jutta Roosen: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 4
1999 6
2000 1
2001 5
2002 8
2003 10
2004 9
2005 8
2006 7
2007 8
2008 10
2009 13
2010 12
2011 20
2012 14
2013 18
2014 12
2015 19
2016 16
2017 6
2018 13
2019 10
2020 5
2021 10
2022 7
2023 8
2024 14
2025 5
Total 279
Download as CSV

Jutta Roosen publications per year - data summary

  • Jutta Roosen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Technical University of Munich, has 279 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997 and 2000, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 9.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.6 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 44 publications, 16% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 59 publications (5.9 per year); 2007-2016: 142 publications (14.2 per year); 2017-2025: 78 publications (8.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jutta Roosen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jutta Roosen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 230 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 230
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jutta Roosen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Jutta Roosen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Technical University of Munich, records 230 publications - the 74th percentile of the discipline.
  • 74% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Jutta Roosen, and about 26% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Jutta Roosen ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Jutta Roosen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jutta Roosen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260 45
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Jutta Roosen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Jutta Roosen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Technical University of Munich, records 45 D-Index - the 52nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 52% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Jutta Roosen, and about 48% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Jutta Roosen falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Jutta Roosen is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on agricultural and biological sciences, with significant contributions in various subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, food science, marketing, ecology, and plant science.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Agriculture sustainability and environmental impact
  • Organic food and agriculture
  • Animal behavior and welfare studies
  • Obesity, physical activity, diet
  • Consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification
  • Food waste reduction and sustainability
  • Environmental sustainability in business

Jutta Roosen has contributed to various publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
  • Appetite
  • The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review
  • Food Policy

Their recent papers include:

  • "Action-related information trumps system information: Influencing consumers' intention to reduce food waste," 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Demand elasticities for fresh meat and welfare effects of meat taxes in Germany," 2021, Food Policy
  • "Reducing chemical inputs in agriculture requires a system change," 2024, Communications Earth & Environment
  • "How does animal welfare taste? Combining sensory and choice experiments to evaluate willingness to pay for animal welfare pork," 2020, Food Quality and Preference
  • "The effect of attribute framing on consumers' attitudes and intentions toward food: A Meta-analysis," 2022, Bio-based and Applied Economics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jutta Roosen include:

  • Christina M. Neubig
  • Irina Dolgopolova
  • Matthias Staudigel
  • Megan Waldrop
  • Corinna Hempel

Best Publications

  • Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States

    Jayson L. Lusk;Jutta Roosen;John A. Fox

  • Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany

    Bernhard J. Kalkbrenner;Jutta Roosen

  • Consumer Demand For and Attitudes Toward Alternative Beef Labeling Strategies in France, Germany, and the UK

    Jutta Roosen;Jayson L. Lusk;John Andrew Fox

  • Observed choices for food safety in retail, survey, and auction markets

    Jason F. Shogren;John A. Fox;Dermot J. Hayes;Jutta Roosen

  • CONSUMERS' VALUATION OF INSECTICIDE USE RESTRICTIONS: AN APPLICATION TO APPLES

    Jutta Roosen

  • Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany.

    Inken B. Christoph;Maike Bruhn;Jutta Roosen

  • Consumer Acceptance of New Food Technologies: Causes and Roots of Controversies

    Jayson L. Lusk;Jutta Roosen;Andrea Bieberstein

  • Market Differentiation Potential of Country-of-origin, Quality and Traceability Labeling

    Wim Verbeke;Jutta Roosen

  • Factors influencing citizens’ acceptance and non-acceptance of wind energy in Germany

    Katharina Langer;Thomas Decker;Jutta Roosen;Klaus Menrad

  • Private labels for premium products: The example of organic food

    Astrid Jonas;Jutta Roosen

  • A qualitative analysis to understand the acceptance of wind energy in Bavaria

    Katharina Langer;Thomas Decker;Jutta Roosen;Klaus Menrad

  • Factors affecting tourists' public transport use and areas visited at destinations

    D. T. Le-Klähn;J. Roosen;R. Gerike;C. M. Hall

  • The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy

    Jayson Lusk;Jutta Roosen;Jason F. Shogren

  • Dietary patterns of adolescents in Germany--associations with nutrient intake and other health related lifestyle characteristics.

    Almut Richter;Christin Heidemann;Matthias B Schulze;Jutta Roosen

  • Consumer choices for nano-food and nano-packaging in France and Germany

    Andrea Bieberstein;Jutta Roosen;Stephan Marette;Sandrine Blanchemanche

  • The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature.

    Frederic Vandermoere;Sandrine Blanchemanche;Andrea Bieberstein;Stephan Marette

  • Do environmental attitudes and food technology neophobia affect perceptions of the benefits of nanotechnology

    Anahita Hosseini Matin;Ellen Goddard;Frédéric Vandermoere;Sandrine Blanchemanche

  • Trust and willingness to pay for nanotechnology food

    Jutta Roosen;Andréa Bieberstein;Sandrine Blanchemanche;Ellen Goddard

  • Consumer Heterogeneity in the Willingness to Pay for Local and Organic Food

    Johanna Lena Hasselbach;Jutta Roosen

  • Systemic failure in the provision of safe food

    David A Hennessy;Jutta Roosen;Helen H Jensen

  • Functional food, uncertainty and consumers’ choices: A lab experiment with enriched yoghurts for lowering cholesterol

    Stéphan Marette;Jutta Roosen;Sandrine Blanchemanche;Eve Feinblatt-Mélèze

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Hennessy
David A. Hennessy Iowa State University
Helen H. Jensen
Helen H. Jensen Iowa State University
Jayson L. Lusk
Jayson L. Lusk Oklahoma State University
Joseph G. Sebranek
Joseph G. Sebranek Iowa State University
Rodolfo M. Nayga
Rodolfo M. Nayga Texas A&M University
Jason F. Shogren
Jason F. Shogren University of Wyoming
Claudia M. Haase
Claudia M. Haase Northwestern University
Catarina Ginja
Catarina Ginja University of Lisbon
Paolo Ajmone-Marsan
Paolo Ajmone-Marsan Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Juha Kantanen
Juha Kantanen Natural Resources Institute Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a range of flexible online degree options. Students seeking to make a positive impact through social work may benefit from cheap msw programs online, which offer quality education at a lower cost. For those interested in working with individuals with behavioral challenges, bcba certification programs online help you qualify for Board Certified Behavior Analyst roles quickly and affordably.

Time-conscious learners may be drawn to online accelerated msw programs, designed to help students earn a master’s degree at a faster pace while still preparing them for diverse careers in social services. Similarly, those interested in psychology can take advantage of the fastest online psychology degree options, allowing a rapid path to graduation and employment in varied psychology-related fields.

Consider balancing affordability, flexibility, and accreditation when choosing the online degree or pathway that best aligns with your career goals in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Jutta Roosen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles