World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
82642
World Ranking
6353
National Ranking
3391

Harold I. Feldman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold I. Feldman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 492 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Harold I. Feldman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold I. Feldman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Harold I. Feldman is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medical research, particularly in nephrology and related areas. Their research portfolio includes a substantial number of publications focusing primarily on kidney disease and management.

Their main field of study is Medicine, with a significant concentration in the subfield of Nephrology. Additional subfields include Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, and Public Health, Environmental, and Occupational Health.

Feldman's work covers a range of important topics within nephrology and associated conditions. Major research topics include:

  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Sodium Intake and Health

Frequent venues for Feldman's publications reflect their focus on kidney-related medicine and include:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Kidney Medicine
  • Kidney International

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Feldman include:

  • "Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference," 2020, Kidney International
  • "Electronic health record alerts for acute kidney injury: multicenter, randomized clinical trial," 2021, BMJ
  • "Adherence to Healthy Dietary Patterns and Risk of CKD Progression and All-Cause Mortality: Findings From the CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) Study," 2020, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • "Risk Factors for CKD Progression," 2020, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • "Association of Multiple Plasma Biomarker Concentrations with Progression of Prevalent Diabetic Kidney Disease: Findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study," 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Feldman has collaborated frequently with several researchers, suggesting a strong network in the nephrology and cardiovascular research communities. Frequent co-authors include Jiang He, James P. Lash, Mahboob Rahman, Alan S. Go, and Panduranga S. Rao.

Best Publications

  • A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate

    Andrew S. Levey;Lesley A. Stevens;Christopher H. Schmid;Yaping (Lucy) Zhang

  • Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C.

    Lesley A. Inker;Christopher H. Schmid;Hocine Tighiouart;John H. Eckfeldt

  • Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

    Paul M. Palevsky;Jane Hongyuan Zhang;Theresa Z. O'Connor;Glenn M. Chertow

  • FGF23 induces left ventricular hypertrophy

    Christian Faul;Ansel P. Amaral;Behzad Oskouei;Ming Chang Hu

  • KDOQI US Commentary on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD

    Lesley A. Inker;Brad C. Astor;Chester H. Fox;Tamara Isakova

  • Estimating GFR Using Serum Cystatin C Alone and in Combination With Serum Creatinine: A Pooled Analysis of 3,418 Individuals With CKD

    Lesley A Stevens;Josef Coresh;Christopher H Schmid;Harold I Feldman

  • The association between hepatitis C infection and survival after orthotopic liver transplantation.

    Lisa M. Forman;James D. Lewis;Jesse A. Berlin;Harold I. Feldman

  • Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 and Risks of Mortality and End-Stage Renal Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

    Tamara Isakova;Huiliang Xie;Wei Yang;Dawei Xie

  • Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: a roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy

    Adeera Levin;Marcello Tonelli;Joseph Bonventre;Josef Coresh

  • Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity.

    H I Feldman;S Kobrin;A Wasserstein

  • Effect of Clopidogrel on Early Failure of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Laura M. Dember;Gerald J. Beck;Michael Allon;James A. Delmez

  • Evaluation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Equation in a Large Diverse Population

    Lesley A Stevens;Josef Coresh;Harold I Feldman;Tom Greene

  • APOL1 Risk Variants, Race, and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

    Afshin Parsa;W. H Linda Kao;Dawei Xie;Brad C. Astor

  • Anaemia in haemodialysis patients of five European countries: association with morbidity and mortality in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

    Francesco Locatelli;Ronald L. Pisoni;Christian Combe;Juergen Bommer

  • The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study: Design and Methods

    Harold I. Feldman;Lawrence J. Appel;Glenn M. Chertow;Denise Cifelli

  • Effect of the use or nonuse of long-term dialysis on the subsequent survival of renal transplants from living donors.

    Kevin C. Mange;Marshall M. Joffe;Harold I. Feldman

  • Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study: Baseline Characteristics and Associations with Kidney Function

    James P. Lash;Alan S. Go;Lawrence J. Appel;Jiang He

  • Association between Albuminuria, Kidney Function, and Inflammatory Biomarker Profile in CKD in CRIC

    Jayanta Gupta;Nandita Mitra;Peter A. Kanetsky;Joe Devaney

  • Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head

    Jesse A Berlin;Jill Santanna;Christopher H Schmid;Lynda A Szczech

  • Chronic kidney disease and prevalent atrial fibrillation: The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC)

    Elsayed Z. Soliman;Ronald J. Prineas;Alan S. Go;Dawei Xie

Frequent Co-Authors

John W. Kusek
John W. Kusek National Institutes of Health
Raymond R. Townsend
Raymond R. Townsend University of Pennsylvania
Alan S. Go
Alan S. Go Kaiser Permanente
Jiang He
Jiang He Tulane University
Chi-yuan Hsu
Chi-yuan Hsu University of California, San Francisco
Mahboob Rahman
Mahboob Rahman Case Western Reserve University
Lawrence J. Appel
Lawrence J. Appel Johns Hopkins University
Akinlolu O. Ojo
Akinlolu O. Ojo University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Myles Wolf
Myles Wolf Duke University
Mary B. Leonard
Mary B. Leonard Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is becoming increasingly popular for students interested in diverse healthcare careers. For those who aspire to become nurse practitioners, programs like asn to np offer flexible pathways for registered nurses to advance their education and clinical skills.

Students passionate about nutrition science can pursue a nutrition bachelor degree online, preparing for roles in wellness, research, or public health. These accredited programs combine science coursework with practical application, fitting the needs of adult learners and working professionals.

For a broader focus on healthcare leadership, consider online mha programs. These graduate degrees are designed for those seeking management roles in hospitals, clinics, or healthcare organizations. Online options provide both convenience and access to CAHME-accredited curricula.

If you’re an RN looking to enhance your qualifications, rn to bsn programs without clinicals can streamline your professional advancement. These programs allow you to earn a bachelor’s degree without in-person clinical requirements, making them ideal for busy nurses.

Best Scientists Citing Harold I. Feldman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles