World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6448 5994 3115 2844 118 6513

Mario F. Teisl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mario F. Teisl between 1989 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mario F. Teisl published across 35 years, from 1989 to 2023, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2015. 2 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2015. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications
1989 2023

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mario F. Teisl: publications per year, 1989 to 2023
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 4
1997 3
1998 3
1999 5
2000 2
2001 7
2002 7
2003 7
2004 6
2005 2
2006 2
2007 8
2008 4
2009 3
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 6
2014 5
2015 9
2016 4
2017 7
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 2
Total 123
Download as CSV

Mario F. Teisl publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario F. Teisl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 118
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mario F. Teisl D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario F. Teisl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mario F. Teisl is affiliated with the University of Maine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a specialization in Food Science.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Food Supply Chain Traceability

Their recent publications showcase work in relevant areas of food policy and community resilience. Notable papers include:

  • "Risk perceptions and food-handling practices in the home," 2020, published in Food Policy
  • "Is Aquaculture a Path to Community Resilience in Maine?", 2023, published in Maine Policy Review

Mario F. Teisl collaborates frequently with several researchers. Regular co-authors include:

  • Keith S. Evans
  • Amy M. Lando
  • Sherry T. Liu
  • Benjamin Cotton
  • Caroline L. Noblet

Their work appears primarily in journals such as Food Policy and Maine Policy Review, reflecting interests closely tied to food policy and regional community issues.

Best Publications

  • Can Eco-Labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe Labeling

    Mario F. Teisl;Brian Roe;Robert L. Hicks

  • US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity

    Brian Roe;Mario F. Teisl;Alan Levy;Matthew Russell

  • Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating Variation

    Brian Roe;Kevin J. Boyle;Mario F. Teisl

  • Is there competition between breast-feeding and maternal employment?

    Brian Roe;Leslie A. Whittington;Sara Beck Fein;Mario F. Teisl

  • Measuring the Welfare Effects of Nutrition Information

    Mario F. Teisl;Mario F. Teisl;Nancy E. Bockstael;Nancy E. Bockstael;Alan Levy

  • A Comparison of Conjoint Analysis Response Formats

    Kevin J. Boyle;Thomas P. Holmes;Mario F. Teisl;Brian Roe

  • Who Cares and Who Acts?: Outdoor Recreationists Exhibit Different Levels of Environmental Concern and Behavior

    Mario F. Teisl;Kelly O'Brien

  • THE ECONOMICS OF LABELING: AN OVERVIEW OF ISSUES FOR HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE

    Brian E. Roe;Mario F. Teisl

  • Non-dirty dancing? Interactions between eco-labels and consumers

    Mario F. Teisl;Jonathan Rubin;Caroline L. Noblet

  • Ecocertification: Why It May Not Be a “Field of Dreams”

    Mario F. Teisl;Brian Roe;Alan S. Levy

  • Genetically modified food labeling: The impacts of message and messenger on consumer perceptions of labels and products

    Brian Roe;Mario F. Teisl

  • Trends in U.S. Consumers' Safe Handling and Consumption of Food and Their Risk Perceptions, 1988 through 2010

    Sara B. Fein;Amy M. Lando;Alan S. Levy;Mario F. Teisl

  • Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products

    Kelly A. O’Brien;Mario F. Teisl

  • Consumer reactions to environmental labels for forest products: A preliminary look

    Mario F. Teisl;Stephanie Peavey;Felicia Newman;Joann Buono

  • Factors affecting consumer assessment of eco-labeled vehicles

    Caroline Lundquist Noblet;Mario F. Teisl;Jonathan Rubin

  • What we may have is a failure to communicate: Labeling environmentally certified forest products

    Mario F. Teisl

  • Test-Retest Reliability of Contingent Valuation with Independent Sample Pretest and Posttest Control Groups

    Mario F. Teisl;Kevin J. Boyle;Daniel W. McCollum;Stephen D. Reiling

  • Incentive Effects on Response Rates, Data Quality, and Survey Administration Costs

    Mario F. Teisl;Brian Roe;Michael E. Vayda

  • The Economics of Voluntary Versus Mandatory Labels

    Brian E. Roe;Mario F. Teisl;Corin R. Deans

  • An Empirical Analysis of United States Consumers' Concerns about Eight Food Production and Processing Technologies

    Yun Jae Hwang;Brian Roe;Mario F. Teisl

  • Information effects on consumer attitudes toward three food technologies: Organic production, biotechnology, and irradiation

    Mario F. Teisl;Sara B. Fein;Alan S. Levy

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian E. Roe
Brian E. Roe The Ohio State University
Kevin J. Boyle
Kevin J. Boyle Virginia Tech
Nancy E. Bockstael
Nancy E. Bockstael University of Maryland, College Park
Thomas P. Holmes
Thomas P. Holmes United States Department of Agriculture
Julie A. Caswell
Julie A. Caswell University of Massachusetts Amherst
John Thøgersen
John Thøgersen Aarhus University
Iain Walker
Iain Walker University of Melbourne
Lucia A. Reisch
Lucia A. Reisch Copenhagen Business School
Richard E. Just
Richard E. Just University of Maryland, College Park
Linda Steg
Linda Steg University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a variety of opportunities, and online degrees now make these fields more accessible than ever. For those interested in mental health and human behavior, masters programs in psychology provide flexible options to deepen expertise and pursue careers as counselors, therapists, or researchers.

If your ambition is to move into leadership roles in education, an edd degree offers a pathway to administrative positions and allows you to influence policy and practice within academic institutions.

For those looking for efficiency and accelerated learning, there is growing demand for masters programs online that can be completed in as little as one year. These programs cater to professionals seeking to upskill quickly while balancing work and personal commitments.

Similarly, many students choose to start their academic journey with an online bachelor's degree, allowing for flexibility and faster completion times. Whether starting or advancing your education, these online options expand access to rewarding careers across social services, public administration, education, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Mario F. Teisl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles