World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
F. Reed Johnson

F. Reed Johnson

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
12343
World Ranking
3324
National Ranking
1605

F. Reed Johnson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Reed Johnson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 198 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

F. Reed Johnson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Reed Johnson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

F. Reed Johnson is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio focused on economics, econometrics, finance, and medicine. Their work spans several subfields including economics and econometrics, general health professions, surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and general decision sciences.

Their research covers a variety of main topics, notably health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life; economic and environmental valuation; decision-making and behavioral economics; vaccine coverage and hesitancy; behavioral health and interventions; healthcare cost, quality, and practices; and COVID-19 epidemiological studies.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by F. Reed Johnson include:

  • Willingness to Accept Trade-Offs Among COVID-19 Cases, Social-Distancing Restrictions, and Economic Impact: A Nationwide US Study (2020) - Value in Health
  • Patient preferences for maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancer treatment (2020) - Gynecologic Oncology
  • What is a Good Death? A Choice Experiment on Care Indicators for Patients at End of Life (2021) - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • Quantifying Value of Hope (2021) - Value in Health
  • Criteria and Process for Initiating and Developing an ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report (2020) - Value in Health

Frequent co-authors in their research include Juan Marcos González, Shelby D. Reed, Jui-Chen Yang, Jessie Sutphin, and Angelyn Fairchild. This collaborative network reflects a strong connection with experts in related fields.

The scientist has published prolifically in several key venues, with repeated contributions to Value in Health and Patient, each hosting seven publications. Other notable publication venues include Medical Decision Making, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, and UNC Libraries.

Best Publications

  • Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

    John F.P. Bridges;A. Brett Hauber;Deborah Marshall;Andrew Lloyd

  • Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force

    F Reed Johnson;Emily Jane Lancsar;Deborah A Marshall;Vikram Kilambi

  • Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability

    William H. Desvousges;F. Reed Johnson;Richard W. Dunford;Sara P. Hudson

  • Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.

    Deborah Marshall;Deborah Marshall;John F. P. Bridges;Brett Hauber;Ruthanne Cameron

  • An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies

    Kevin J. Boyle;William H. Desvousges;F.Reed Johnson;Richard W. Dunford

  • Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing

    Kathryn A Phillips;Tara Maddala;F. Reed Johnson

  • Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs

    F.Reed Johnson;William H Desvousges

  • Crohn's disease patients' risk-benefit preferences: serious adverse event risks versus treatment efficacy.

    F. Reed Johnson;Semra Özdemir;Carol Mansfield;Steven Hass

  • Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format stated-preference approach

    F. Reed Johnson;Melissa Ruby Banzhaf;William H. Desvousges

  • Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys

    Kathryn A Phillips;F Reed Johnson;Tara Maddala

  • Experimental Design For Stated-Choice Studies

    F. Reed Johnson;Barbara Kanninen;Matthew Bingham;Semra Özdemir

  • The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments.

    F. Reed Johnson;Jui-Chen Yang;Shelby D. Reed

  • Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview

    Axel C. Mühlbacher;Anika Kaczynski;Peter Zweifel;F. Reed Johnson

  • Factors that affect adherence to bipolar disorder treatments: a stated-preference approach.

    F. Reed Johnson;Semra Özdemir;Ranjani Manjunath;A. Brett Hauber

  • Measuring Patient Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using a Choice-Format Survey

    Deborah A. Marshall;Deborah A. Marshall;F. Reed Johnson;Kathryn A. Phillips;John K. Marshall

  • Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice

    Axel Mühlbacher;F. Reed Johnson

  • Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care.

    Semra Özdemir;F. Reed Johnson;A. Brett Hauber

  • Do Smokers Respond to Health Shocks

    V. Kerry Smith;Donald H. Taylor;Frank A. Sloan;F. Reed Johnson

  • Multiple sclerosis patients—benefit-risk preferences: Serious adverse event risks versus treatment efficacy

    F. Reed Johnson;George Van Houtven;Semra Özdemir;Steve Hass

  • Can public information programs affect risk perceptions

    V. Kerry Smith;William H. Desvousges;F. Reed Johnson;Ann Fisher

Frequent Co-Authors

William H. Desvousges
William H. Desvousges Research Triangle Park Foundation
James D. Lewis
James D. Lewis University of Pennsylvania
V. Kerry Smith
V. Kerry Smith Arizona State University
John F. P. Bridges
John F. P. Bridges The Ohio State University
Kevin J. Boyle
Kevin J. Boyle Virginia Tech
Dale Whittington
Dale Whittington University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bruce E. Sands
Bruce E. Sands Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
H. Spencer Banzhaf
H. Spencer Banzhaf North Carolina State University
Frank A. Sloan
Frank A. Sloan Duke University
Peter Zweifel
Peter Zweifel University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering Social Sciences or Humanities, there are a variety of online degree options that can kickstart or advance your career. For those seeking a fast route to specialization, online master degree programs offer an opportunity to gain advanced knowledge in as little as one year. These flexible programs can help you balance studies with work or family commitments.

For undergraduates looking to enter the workforce quickly, accelerated online programs provide a way to complete your bachelor’s degree faster, saving both time and tuition costs. These options are popular among adult learners and career-changers.

Cost is often a concern, but affordable pathways exist, especially in fields like social work. You can find the cheapest msw programs online, making advanced study in social work accessible and budget-friendly.

Similarly, careers in behavioral analysis are growing, and accredited online bcba programs can prepare you for Board Certified Behavior Analyst certification and new job opportunities in mental health, education, and community services.

Best Scientists Citing F. Reed Johnson

Trending Scientists