What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Microeconomics
- Health care
His scientific interests lie mostly in Health care, Actuarial science, Public economics, Demography and Willingness to pay.
He studies Health care, namely Health policy.
His Actuarial science research includes themes of Conjoint analysis, External validity and Revealed preference.
His studies in Public economics integrate themes in fields like Health economics, Insurance law, Managed care and Self-insurance.
His work carried out in the field of Demography brings together such families of science as Population ageing and Life expectancy.
The various areas that Peter Zweifel examines in his Willingness to pay study include Occupational safety and health and Product.
His most cited work include:
- Ageing of population and health care expenditure: a red herring? (641 citations)
- Moral Hazard and Consumer Incentives in Health Care (332 citations)
- Population ageing and health care expenditure: a school of ‘red herrings’? (227 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Peter Zweifel mainly focuses on Actuarial science, Health care, Public economics, Incentive and Willingness to pay.
His Actuarial science research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Social determinants of health, Payment, Cost sharing and Self-insurance.
His Health care research focuses on subjects like Population ageing, which are linked to Demography.
His Public economics research integrates issues from Competition, Health economics and Health policy.
His Health economics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Public finance and Health administration.
The Willingness to pay study combines topics in areas such as Government, Empirical research, Redistribution of income and wealth and Redistribution.
He most often published in these fields:
- Actuarial science (31.38%)
- Health care (22.58%)
- Public economics (20.23%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?
- Actuarial science (31.38%)
- Payment (7.04%)
- Health care (22.58%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Peter Zweifel spends much of his time researching Actuarial science, Payment, Health care, Health economics and Incentive.
His Actuarial science research includes elements of Moral hazard and Social determinants of health.
His work on Community rating as part of general Health care study is frequently linked to Mythology, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Health economics research incorporates elements of Public finance and Public economics.
His Public economics research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Health insurance, Preference and Tourism.
His Incentive research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Control and Production.
Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon: A Reexamination (136 citations)
- Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview (56 citations)
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Universal Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Using a Dynamic Bayesian Methodology: The BEST II Study (21 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Microeconomics
- Finance
Health care, Actuarial science, Health economics, Public finance and Public health are his primary areas of study.
His Health care study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Ranking, Statistical inference and Public economics.
His work deals with themes such as Law and economics, Rationality and Rationing, which intersect with Public economics.
Peter Zweifel has included themes like Incentive, Social determinants of health and Payment in his Actuarial science study.
His research integrates issues of Moral hazard and Community rating in his study of Health economics.
He combines subjects such as MEDLINE, Nursing, Mental health, Psychiatry and Health care management with his study of Public finance.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
