World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
6661
World Ranking
8820
National Ranking
659

J. Webb publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Webb sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

J. Webb D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Webb sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Webb is affiliated with Ricardo AEA in the United Kingdom and is active in the field of Environmental Science, with research contributions spanning various subfields and topics. Their work includes investigations into Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Biomaterials, Process Chemistry and Technology, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's research covers multiple topics, notably:

  • Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Mine drainage and remediation techniques
  • Clay minerals and soil interactions
  • Odor and emission control technologies
  • Indoor air quality and microbial exposure
  • Composting and vermicomposting techniques
  • Mining and resource management

J. Webb has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed publications spanning from 2020 to 2025. These papers include:

  • "The response of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare) and forage maize (Zea mays) crops to polyhalite, a multi-nutrient fertilizer" (2020) published in The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • "Guidance on the conversion of gaseous emission units to standardized emission factors and recommendations for data reporting" (2021) published in Carbon Management
  • "Establish Trigger Levels for Harmful Algal Blooms" (2023) published in Opflow
  • "Forecasting industrial induced tipping points in first nations' land use in northeast British Columbia" (2024) published in The Extractive Industries and Society
  • "Reference List for 40@40: Soil Use and Management, a Fortieth Anniversary Retrospective" (2025) published in Soil Use and Management

The scientist has published work in several venues, including:

  • The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • Carbon Management
  • Opflow
  • The Extractive Industries and Society
  • Soil Use and Management

Frequent collaborations have been established with researchers such as Robert Lillywhite, Jeremy Wiltshire, H. Menadue, Tony J. van der Weerden, and Mélynda Hassouna.

Best Publications

  • Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review

    P Loveland;J Webb

  • The impacts of manure application methods on emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and on crop response—A review

    J. Webb;Brian Pain;Shabtai Bittman;John Morgan

  • A review of the effect of N fertilizer type on gaseous emissions

    Roland Harrison;J. Webb

  • Managing ammonia emissions from livestock production in Europe.

    Jim Webb;Harald Menzi;B. F. Pain;Tom H. Misselbrook

  • Algorithms determining ammonia emission from buildings housing cattle and pigs and from manure stores

    S.G. Sommer;G.Q. Zhang;A. Bannink;D. Chadwick

  • A mass-flow model of ammonia emissions from UK livestock production

    J. Webb;T.H. Misselbrook

  • Managing soil organic matter – implications for soil structure on organic farms

    M.A. Shepherd;R. Harrison;J. Webb

  • Management, regulation and environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilization in northwestern Europe under the Nitrates Directive; a benchmark study

    H. J. M. van Grinsven;H. F. M. ten Berge;T. Dalgaard;B. Fraters

  • The impact of the Nitrates Directive on nitrogen emissions from agriculture in the EU-27 during 2000-2008.

    G.L. Velthof;J.P. Lesschen;J. Webb;S. Pietrzak

  • An Assessment of the Variation of Manure Nitrogen Efficiency throughout Europe and an Appraisal of Means to Increase Manure-N Efficiency

    J. Webb;Peter Sørensen;Gerard Velthof;Barbara Amon

  • Dispersion, deposition and impacts of atmospheric ammonia: quantifying local budgets and spatial variability

    M. A. Sutton;C. Milford;U. Dragosits;C. J. Place

  • Costs and benefits of nitrogen in the environment

    Corjan Brink;Hans van Grinsven;Brian H. Jacobsen;Ari Rabl

  • Ammonia emission, deposition and impact assessment at the field scale: a case study of sub-grid spatial variability

    U Dragosits;M.R Theobald;C.J Place;E Lord

  • Best available technology for European livestock farms: Availability, effectiveness and uptake.

    L. Loyon;C. H. Burton;T. H. Misselbrook;J. Webb

  • Review of existing information on the interrelations between soil and climate change. (ClimSoil). Final report

    Rene Schils;Peter Kuikman;Jari Liski;Marcel Van Oijen

  • Do foods imported into the UK have a greater environmental impact than the same foods produced within the UK

    J Webb;Adrian G. Williams;Emma Hope;David Evans

  • Emissions of volatile organic compounds originating from UK livestock agriculture

    PJ Hobbs;J Webb;TT Mottram;B Grant

  • Gaseous emissions from outdoor concrete yards used by livestock

    T.H Misselbrook;J Webb;D.R Chadwick;S Ellis

  • Emissions of ammonia and nitrous oxide following incorporation into the soil of farmyard manures stored at different densities

    J. Webb;D. R. Chadwick;S. Ellis

  • The effect of crop residue incorporation date on soil inorganic nitrogen, nitrate leaching and nitrogen mineralization

    R. D. J. Mitchell;R. Harrison;K. J. Russell;J. Webb

  • Review of existing information on the interrelations between soil and climate change.

    R. Schils;P. Kuikman;J. Liski;M. van Oijen

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Misselbrook
Tom Misselbrook Rothamsted Research
David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick Bangor University
Mark A. Sutton
Mark A. Sutton Natural Environment Research Council
D. Scholefield
D. Scholefield Rothamsted Research
Sven G. Sommer
Sven G. Sommer Aarhus University
Bridget A. Emmett
Bridget A. Emmett Natural Environment Research Council
S. C. Jarvis
S. C. Jarvis Rothamsted Research
Roger Sylvester-Bradley
Roger Sylvester-Bradley Agricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom)
Gerard L. Velthof
Gerard L. Velthof Wageningen University & Research
B. J. Chambers
B. J. Chambers Mansfield University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career paths. Many find most affordable online general studies degree programs to be a practical option, combining flexibility and cost-effectiveness while broadening foundational knowledge applicable to environmental fields.

If balancing coursework with other commitments is a priority, programs recognized among the easiest bachelor degree options can provide accessible entry points into areas that complement environmental studies, reducing barriers to degree completion.

For those passionate about Earth's physical aspects, pursuing a geology online degree offers specialized knowledge. This pathway looks closely at soil, rock formations, and geological processes, crucial for careers in environmental consulting or resource management.

Additionally, a geographic information systems degree equips students with cutting-edge tools to analyze spatial data. GIS expertise is highly valued in environmental monitoring, urban planning, and conservation efforts, making it a strategic complement to Environmental Sciences.

Best Scientists Citing J. Webb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles