World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 70 723 666 63 54 332 15238

Tom Misselbrook publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tom Misselbrook between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tom Misselbrook published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2005. 7 of the 406 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2005. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

406 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tom Misselbrook: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 4
1996 11
1997 9
1998 6
1999 10
2000 9
2001 11
2002 9
2003 12
2004 10
2005 24
2006 18
2007 16
2008 8
2009 8
2010 19
2011 12
2012 11
2013 16
2014 15
2015 14
2016 24
2017 10
2018 15
2019 24
2020 19
2021 20
2022 14
2023 13
2024 6
2025 1
Total 406
Download as CSV

Tom Misselbrook publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Misselbrook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–335 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 332 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15 332
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Tom Misselbrook D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Misselbrook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40 70
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Carbon dioxide

Tom Misselbrook focuses on Agronomy, Manure, Slurry, Environmental engineering and Livestock. His Agronomy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Denitrification, Nitrate, Animal science and Nitrous oxide. His Manure study combines topics in areas such as Environmental impact assessment, Straw and Pollution.

His Slurry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Soil science, Dry matter and Diffusion. His Environmental engineering research incorporates themes from Air pollution, Ammonia emission, Relative humidity and Arable land. His studies examine the connections between Livestock and genetics, as well as such issues in Agriculture, with regards to Environmental protection, Grazing and Ammoniacal nitrogen.

His most cited work include:

  • Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions (341 citations)
  • Ammonia emission factors for UK agriculture. (289 citations)
  • Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition (185 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Tom Misselbrook mostly deals with Agronomy, Slurry, Agriculture, Environmental engineering and Environmental chemistry. Tom Misselbrook combines subjects such as Livestock and Soil water with his study of Agronomy. His work deals with themes such as Dry matter, Animal science, Arable land, Ammonia volatilization from urea and Pulp and paper industry, which intersect with Slurry.

His study in Agriculture is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Natural resource economics, Greenhouse gas and Environmental protection. He interconnects Air pollution and Ammonia emission in the investigation of issues within Environmental engineering. His biological study deals with issues like Nitrous oxide, which deal with fields such as Methane.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (23.42%)
  • Slurry (22.59%)
  • Agriculture (17.08%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Agronomy (23.42%)
  • Animal science (13.77%)
  • Soil water (8.26%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Tom Misselbrook spends much of his time researching Agronomy, Animal science, Soil water, Greenhouse gas and Fertilizer. His research integrates issues of Nitrification and Ecosystem in his study of Agronomy. Tom Misselbrook studied Animal science and Feces that intersect with Hay.

His Soil water research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Environmental chemistry, Denitrification and Mulch. His Greenhouse gas research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Agriculture, Environmental engineering, Environmental protection and Nitrous oxide. His Environmental engineering research integrates issues from Air pollution, Air pollutants, Mediterranean climate and Air quality index.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming (84 citations)
  • Impacts of plastic film mulching on crop yields, soil water, nitrate, and organic carbon in Northwestern China: A meta-analysis. (52 citations)
  • The contribution of cattle urine and dung to nitrous oxide emissions: Quantification of country specific emission factors and implications for national inventories. (49 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Carbon dioxide

His scientific interests lie mostly in Nitrification, Agronomy, Nitrous oxide, Ammonium nitrate and Animal science. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Soil water and Agronomy. His Nitrous oxide study incorporates themes from Grassland, Pasture and Greenhouse gas.

Tom Misselbrook usually deals with Greenhouse gas and limits it to topics linked to Environmental chemistry and Soil properties, Organic fertilizer and Methane. His Animal science course of study focuses on Livestock and Agriculture, Nutrient, Agricultural engineering, Manure and Nutrient pollution. The concepts of his Agriculture study are interwoven with issues in Cost–benefit analysis and Externality.

Best Publications

  • Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions

    Dave Chadwick;Sven Sommer;Rachel Thorman;David Fangueiro

  • Agriculture: Steps to sustainable livestock

    Mark C. Eisler;Michael R. F. Lee;Michael R. F. Lee;John F. Tarlton;Graeme B. Martin

  • Ammonia emission factors for UK agriculture.

    T.H. Misselbrook;T.J. Van Der Weerden;B.F. Pain;S.C. Jarvis

  • Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions.

    C. D. Evans;M. Peacock;A. J. Baird;R. R. E. Artz

  • Recycling of livestock manure in a whole-farm perspective

    S. O. Petersen;S. G. Sommer;F. Beline;C. Burton

  • First 20 years of DNDC (DeNitrification DeComposition): Model evolution

    Sarah L. Gilhespy;Steven Anthony;Laura Cardenas;David Chadwick

  • Effect of turning regime and seasonal weather conditions on nitrogen and phosphorus losses during aerobic composting of cattle manure.

    R. J. Parkinson;P. Gibbs;S. Burchett;T. H. Misselbrook

  • The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming

    Andrew Balmford;Tatsuya Amano;Harriet Bartlett;Dave Chadwick

  • Managing ammonia emissions from livestock production in Europe.

    Jim Webb;Harald Menzi;B. F. Pain;Tom H. Misselbrook

  • Dietary manipulation in dairy cattle: laboratory experiments to assess the influence on ammonia emissions.

    T.H. Misselbrook;J.M. Powell;G.A. Broderick;J.H. Grabber

  • Algorithms determining ammonia emission from buildings housing cattle and pigs and from manure stores

    S.G. Sommer;G.Q. Zhang;A. Bannink;D. Chadwick

  • Assessment of Odours from Livestock Wastes by a Photoionization Detector, an Electronic Nose, Olfactometry and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

    P.J. Hobbs;T.H. Misselbrook;B.F. Pain

  • A mass-flow model of ammonia emissions from UK livestock production

    J. Webb;T.H. Misselbrook

  • An inhibitor of urease activity effectively reduces ammonia emissions from soil treated with urea under Mediterranean conditions

    Alberto Sanz-Cobena;Thomas H. Misselbrook;Augusto Arce;Juan I. Mingot

  • Impacts of plastic film mulching on crop yields, soil water, nitrate, and organic carbon in Northwestern China: A meta-analysis.

    Dedi Ma;Lei Chen;Hongchao Qu;Yilin Wang

  • Development of emission factors and efficiency of two nitrification inhibitors, DCD and DMPP

    Claudia Gilsanz;Dolores Báez;Tom H. Misselbrook;Mewa S. Dhanoa

  • Effect of water addition and the urease inhibitor NBPT on the abatement of ammonia emission from surface applied urea

    Alberto Sanz-Cobena;Thomas Misselbrook;Vicci Camp;Antonio Vallejo

  • Optimizing chamber methods for measuring nitrous oxide emissions from plot-based agricultural experiments

    D. R. Chadwick;L. M. Cardenas;T. H. Misselbrook;K. A. Smith

  • Reduction of ammonia emission by slurry application techniques.

    K.A. Smith;D.R. Jackson;T.H. Misselbrook;B.F. Pain

  • Predicting ammonia losses following the application of livestock manure to land.

    T.H. Misselbrook;F.A. Nicholson;B.J. Chambers

  • The contribution of cattle urine and dung to nitrous oxide emissions: Quantification of country specific emission factors and implications for national inventories.

    D. R. Chadwick;L. M. Cardenas;M. S. Dhanoa;N. Donovan

  • Effectiveness of urease inhibition on the abatement of ammonia, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions in a non-irrigated Mediterranean barley field

    Diego Abalos;Alberto Sanz-Cobena;Thomas Misselbrook;Antonio Vallejo

  • Odour and ammonia emissions following the spreading of anaerobically-digested pig slurry on grassland

    B.F. Pain;T.H. Misselbrook;C.R. Clarkson;Y.J. Rees

  • Production and Emission of Odours and Gases from Ageing Pig Waste

    P.J. Hobbs;T.H. Misselbrook;T.R. Cumby

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Chadwick
David R. Chadwick Bangor University
Laura M. Cardenas
Laura M. Cardenas Rothamsted Research
J. Webb
J. Webb Ricardo AEA (United Kingdom)
Phil J. Hobbs
Phil J. Hobbs Rothamsted Research
B. J. Chambers
B. J. Chambers Mansfield University
Ulrike Dragosits
Ulrike Dragosits UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Mark A. Sutton
Mark A. Sutton Natural Environment Research Council
D. Scholefield
D. Scholefield Rothamsted Research
Sven G. Sommer
Sven G. Sommer Aarhus University
Christopher K. Reynolds
Christopher K. Reynolds University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tom Misselbrook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles