World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
10393
World Ranking
5527
National Ranking
18

Julian Wright publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian Wright sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Julian Wright D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian Wright sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julian Wright is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore, contributing extensively to the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their research primarily focuses on Digital Platforms and Economics, with attention also to Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing, Auction Theory and Applications, ICT Impact and Policies, Sharing Economy and Platforms, Merger and Competition Analysis, and Game Theory and Applications.

The subfields in which Wright has specialized include Strategy and Management, Marketing, Management Science and Operations Research, Media Technology, and Economics and Econometrics. The scientist's work has been disseminated in various academic outlets, notably in the SSRN Electronic Journal, The RAND Journal of Economics, Management Science, American Economic Journal Microeconomics, and International Journal of Industrial Organization.

Key recent papers by Wright demonstrate an engagement with platform economics and market behaviors. These include:

  • Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces? (2022, The RAND Journal of Economics)
  • Search platforms: showrooming and price parity clauses (2020, The RAND Journal of Economics)
  • Data-enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage (2023, The RAND Journal of Economics)
  • Creating Platforms by Hosting Rivals (2020, Management Science)
  • Intermediation and Steering: Competition in Prices and Commissions (2022, American Economic Journal Microeconomics)

Wright has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Andrei Hagiu, Tat-How Teh, Chengsi Wang, John C. Ham, and Ziqiu Ye. The strongest collaborative relationship is with Andrei Hagiu, with whom Wright has coauthored multiple publications.

The publication venues where Wright has contributed most frequently are:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The RAND Journal of Economics
  • Management Science
  • American Economic Journal Microeconomics
  • International Journal of Industrial Organization

Best Publications

  • Multi-sided platforms

    Andrei Hagiu;Julian Wright

  • Two-Sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks, and Exclusive Contracts

    Mark Armstrong;Julian Wright

  • Marketplace or Reseller

    Andrei Hagiu;Julian Wright

  • One-sided Logic in Two-sided Markets

    Julian Wright

  • Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry

    Ulrich Kaiser;Julian Wright

  • How Do Firms Choose Their Lenders? An Empirical Investigation

    Miguel Cantillo;Julian Wright

  • Open mouth operations

    Graeme Guthrie;Julian Wright

  • The Determinants of Optimal Interchange Fees in Payment Systems

    Julian Wright

  • Optimal card payment systems

    Julian Wright

  • Multihoming and compatibility

    Toker Doganoglu;Julian Wright

  • Interconnection in Network Industries

    Michael Carter;Julian Wright

  • Asymmetric Network Interconnection

    Michael Carter;Michael Carter;Julian Wright;Julian Wright

  • COMPETING PAYMENT SCHEMES

    Graeme Guthrie;Julian Wright

  • Access Pricing under Competition: An Application to Cellular Networks

    Julian Wright

  • Mobile Call Termination

    Mark Armstrong;Julian Wright

  • Price Coherence and Excessive Intermediation

    Benjamin Edelman;Julian Wright

  • Exclusive dealing with imperfect downstream competition

    Jose Miguel Abito;Julian Wright

  • Search platforms: showrooming and price parity clauses

    Chengsi Wang;Julian Wright

  • Data‐enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage

    Unknown

  • Exclusive dealing with network effects

    Toker Doganoglu;Toker Doganoglu;Julian Wright

  • Two-Sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts

    Mark Armstrong;Julian Wright

  • Asymmetric Network Interconnection

    Julian Wright;Michael Carter

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrei Hagiu
Andrei Hagiu Boston University
Mark Armstrong
Mark Armstrong University of Oxford
Jean-Charles Rochet
Jean-Charles Rochet Toulouse School of Economics
Martin Peitz
Martin Peitz University of Mannheim
Bruno Jullien
Bruno Jullien Toulouse School of Economics
Luis M. B. Cabral
Luis M. B. Cabral New York University
Tommaso M. Valletti
Tommaso M. Valletti Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Social Sciences and Humanities offers numerous online degree options, opening the door to many rewarding career pathways. Online programs provide flexibility and accessibility, allowing you to balance studies with personal or professional commitments. It’s important to consider accreditation, program duration, and career outcomes when choosing the right pathway.

For those interested in social work, one year msw programs deliver an accelerated route to earning your Master of Social Work, preparing you for licensure and a variety of positions in social services. Aspiring psychology professionals can enroll in a 2 year psychology degree online, which covers foundational knowledge and creates pathways into counseling, human resources, or research.

If you’re focused on counseling, look for a cacrep online masters in counseling. CACREP accreditation is a key indicator of program quality and is often required for licensure. For those aiming to support couples and families, a marriage and family therapy degree online can open doors to specialized counseling roles.

With so many flexible, accredited options, the U.S. education landscape supports a wide array of interests in the social sciences and humanities, leading to versatile and meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Julian Wright

Trending Scientists