World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4790 4434 2269 2063 122 6738

Danielle E. Ramo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Danielle E. Ramo between 2004 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Danielle E. Ramo published across 21 years, from 2004 to 2024, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2018. 5 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2018. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication
2004 2024

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Danielle E. Ramo: publications per year, 2004 to 2024
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 1
2010 6
2011 3
2012 7
2013 6
2014 6
2015 13
2016 4
2017 9
2018 21
2019 12
2020 10
2021 10
2022 1
2023 4
2024 1
Total 125
Download as CSV

Danielle E. Ramo publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danielle E. Ramo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 122 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 122
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Danielle E. Ramo D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danielle E. Ramo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Danielle E. Ramo is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focused on psychology and medicine, with significant contributions to social sciences.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, their subfields of focus are:

  • Physiology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Ramo's research covers several core topics, including:

  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Ramo include:

  • Effects of Social Media on Adolescents' Willingness and Intention to Use E-Cigarettes: An Experimental Investigation, 2020, Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Smartphone App to Address Loneliness Among College Students: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, JMIR Mental Health
  • Problematic Social Media Use in Sexual and Gender Minority Young Adults: Observational Study, 2021, JMIR Mental Health
  • A Facebook Intervention to Address Cigarette Smoking and Heavy Episodic Drinking: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Delivering Vaping Cessation Interventions to Adolescents and Young Adults on Instagram: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial, 2022, BMC Public Health

The common publication venues where Ramo has published include:

  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • BMC Public Health
  • Psychology of Popular Media

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ramo are:

  • Judith J. Prochaska
  • Meredith C. Meacham
  • Erin A. Vogel
  • Kevin Delucchi
  • Derek D. Satre

Best Publications

  • Broad Reach and Targeted Recruitment Using Facebook for an Online Survey of Young Adult Substance Use

    Danielle E Ramo;Judith J Prochaska

  • Gender differences in factors influencing alcohol use and drinking progression among adolescents

    Marya T. Schulte;Danielle Ramo;Sandra A. Brown;Sandra A. Brown

  • Tobacco and marijuana use among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review of their co-use

    Danielle E. Ramo;Howard Liu;Judith J. Prochaska

  • Internet gaming disorder: Trends in prevalence 1998-2016.

    Wendy Feng;Danielle E. Ramo;Steven R. Chan;James A. Bourgeois

  • Use of the Chatbot “Vivibot” to Deliver Positive Psychology Skills and Promote Well-Being Among Young People After Cancer Treatment: Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

    Stephanie Greer;Danielle Ramo;Yin Juei Chang;Michael Fu

  • Facebook recruitment of young adult smokers for a cessation trial: Methods, metrics, and lessons learned

    Danielle E. Ramo;Theresa M.S. Rodriguez;Kathryn Chavez;Markus J. Sommer

  • Meta-analysis of the association of alcohol-related social media use with alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in adolescents and young adults

    Brenda L. Curtis;Samantha J. Lookatch;Danielle E. Ramo;James R. McKay

  • Adolescent Exposure to Toxic Volatile Organic Chemicals From E-Cigarettes

    Mark L. Rubinstein;Kevin Delucchi;Neal L. Benowitz;Danielle E. Ramo

  • Reaching young adult smokers through the Internet: Comparison of three recruitment mechanisms

    Danielle E. Ramo;Sharon M. Hall;Judith J. Prochaska

  • Classes of substance abuse relapse situations: a comparison of adolescents and adults.

    Danielle E. Ramo;Sandra A. Brown

  • Reliability and validity of self-reported smoking in an anonymous online survey with young adults.

    Danielle E. Ramo;Sharon M. Hall;Judith J. Prochaska

  • Impact of quitting smoking and smoking cessation treatment on substance use outcomes: An updated and narrative review

    Karma McKelvey;Johannes Thrul;Danielle Ramo

  • Prevalence and correlates of electronic-cigarette use in young adults: Findings from three studies over five years

    Danielle E. Ramo;Kelly C. Young-Wolff;Judith J. Prochaska

  • Feasibility and Quit Rates of the Tobacco Status Project: A Facebook Smoking Cessation Intervention for Young Adults

    Danielle E Ramo;Johannes Thrul;Kathryn Chavez;Kevin L Delucchi

  • Reliability and validity of young adults' anonymous online reports of marijuana use and thoughts about use.

    Danielle E. Ramo;Howard Liu;Judith J. Prochaska

  • Life stress, coping and comorbid youth: an examination of the stress-vulnerability model for substance relapse.

    Kristen G Anderson;Danielle E Ramo;Sandra A Brown

  • Typology of club drug use among young adults recruited using time-space sampling.

    Danielle E. Ramo;Christian Grov;Kevin Delucchi;Brian C. Kelly

  • Context of relapse for substance-dependent adults with and without comorbid psychiatric disorders.

    Susan R. Tate;Sandra A. Brown;Marina Unrod;Danielle E. Ramo

  • Marijuana and Tobacco Co-Use in Young Adults: Patterns and Thoughts About Use

    Danielle E. Ramo;Kevin L. Delucchi;Sharon M. Hall;Howard Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith J. Prochaska
Judith J. Prochaska Stanford University
Kevin L. Delucchi
Kevin L. Delucchi University of California, San Francisco
Sandra A. Brown
Sandra A. Brown University of California, San Diego
Sharon M. Hall
Sharon M. Hall University of California, San Francisco
Derek D. Satre
Derek D. Satre University of California, San Francisco
Pamela M. Ling
Pamela M. Ling University of California, San Francisco
Mark G. Myers
Mark G. Myers University of California, San Diego
Jeffrey T. Parsons
Jeffrey T. Parsons City University of New York
Christian Grov
Christian Grov City University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees are transforming access to Social Sciences and Humanities education in the USA. Flexible options like masters in psychology online allow students to build careers in counseling, research, or organizational behavior—all while balancing work and life commitments.

For those interested in accelerated study, there are growing options such as accelerated degree programs online. These programs help students complete their bachelor's faster and enter the workforce sooner. Many institutions now also offer 1 year master's programs online, providing a direct route to advanced knowledge and improved career prospects with minimal time away from work.

Education professionals seeking leadership roles can benefit from accelerated edd programs. These fast-track doctorates are ideal for advancing in academia, administration, or policy. With so many online and accelerated pathways available, pursuing an education in the Social Sciences and Humanities now offers greater flexibility—and opportunity—than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Danielle E. Ramo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles