World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
18279
World Ranking
6903
National Ranking
300

Stéphane Jacquemoud publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stéphane Jacquemoud sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 116 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stéphane Jacquemoud D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stéphane Jacquemoud sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stéphane Jacquemoud is a researcher affiliated with the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris in France. Their work spans multiple disciplines within environmental science and engineering, with a primary focus on the applications of remote sensing technologies.

The main fields of study for Jacquemoud include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

More specifically, their research touches on various subfields such as:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Ecology
  • Media Technology
  • Atmospheric Science

Jacquemoud's research interests are reflected in the key topics addressed in their publications, including:

  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Remote-Sensing Image Classification

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Jacquemoud include:

  • MARMIT-2: An improved version of the MARMIT model to predict soil reflectance as a function of surface water content in the solar domain (2022), Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Remote Sensing Data for Digital Soil Mapping in French Research-A Review (2023), Remote Sensing
  • ND-space: Normalized difference spectral mapping (2021), Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Estimating leaf mass per area with leaf radiative transfer model (2023), Remote Sensing of Environment
  • A New Digital Terrain Model of the Huygens Landing Site on Saturn's Largest Moon, Titan (2020), Earth and Space Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jacquemoud include:

  • Antoine Łucas
  • Xavier Briottet
  • Sophie Fabre
  • Alice Dupiau
  • William Philpot

Jacquemoud's work is regularly published in journals such as:

  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Remote Sensing
  • Earth and Space Science
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Best Publications

  • PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra

    S. Jacquemoud;F. Baret

  • PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization

    Stéphane Jacquemoud;Wout Verhoef;Frédéric Baret;Cédric Bacour

  • Detecting vegetation leaf water content using reflectance in the optical domain

    Pietro Ceccato;Stéphane Flasse;Stefano Tarantola;Stéphane Jacquemoud

  • PROSPECT-4 and 5: Advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments

    Jean Baptiste Feret;Jean Baptiste Feret;Christophe François;Gregory P. Asner;Anatoly A. Gitelson

  • Estimating leaf biochemistry using the PROSPECT leaf optical properties model

    S. Jacquemoud;S.L. Ustin;J. Verdebout;G. Schmuck

  • Retrieval of foliar information about plant pigment systems from high resolution spectroscopy

    Susan L. Ustin;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Stéphane Jacquemoud;Michael Schaepman

  • PROSPECT-D: towards modeling leaf optical properties through a complete lifecycle

    J.-B. Féret;A.A. Gitelson;A.A. Gitelson;S.D. Noble;S. Jacquemoud

  • Comparison of four radiative transfer models to simulate plant canopies reflectance: direct and inverse mode.

    S Jacquemoud;C Bacour;H Poilvé;J.-P Frangi

  • Extraction of vegetation biophysical parameters by inversion of the PROSPECT + SAIL models on sugar beet canopy reflectance data. Application to TM and AVIRIS sensors

    S. Jacquemoud;F. Baret;B. Andrieu;F.M. Danson

  • Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content.

    Yuri Knyazikhin;Mitchell A. Schull;Pauline Stenberg;Matti Mõttus

  • Leaf optical properties with explicit description of its biochemical composition: Direct and inverse problems

    Th. Fourty;F. Baret;S. Jacquemoud;G. Schmuck

  • The soil line concept in remote sensing

    F. Baret;S. Jacquemoud;J. F. Hanocq

  • Modeling Spectral and Bidirectional Soil Reflectance

    S. Jacquemoud;F. Baret;J.F. Hanocq

  • Inversion of the PROSPECT + SAIL Canopy Reflectance Model from AVIRIS Equivalent Spectra: Theoretical Study

    S Jacquemoud

  • Critique of stepwise multiple linear regression for the extraction of leaf biochemistry information from leaf reflectance data

    Y.L. Grossman;S.L. Ustin;S. Jacquemoud;E.W. Sanderson

  • Optimizing spectral indices and chemometric analysis of leaf chemical properties using radiative transfer modeling

    Jean Baptiste Féret;Jean Baptiste Féret;Jean Baptiste Féret;Christophe François;Anatoly Gitelson;Gregory P. Asner

  • Estimating canopy water content of chaparral shrubs using optical methods.

    Susan L. Ustin;Dar A. Roberts;Jorge Pinzón;Stephane Jacquemoud

  • Modeled analysis of the biophysical nature of spectral shifts and comparison with information content of broad bands

    F. Baret;S. Jacquemoud;G. Guyot;C. Leprieur

  • 3-D mapping of a multi-layered Mediterranean forest using ALS data

    António Ferraz;António Ferraz;Frédéric Bretar;Stéphane Jacquemoud;Gil Gonçalves

  • Leaf BRDF measurements and model for specular and diffuse components differentiation

    Laurent Bousquet;Laurent Bousquet;Sophie Lachérade;Sophie Lachérade;Stéphane Jacquemoud;Stéphane Jacquemoud;Ismaël Moya

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan L. Ustin
Susan L. Ustin University of California, Davis
Frédéric Baret
Frédéric Baret INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Gregory P. Asner
Gregory P. Asner Arizona State University
Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada
Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada Spanish National Research Council
Anatoly A. Gitelson
Anatoly A. Gitelson University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Margarida Tomé
Margarida Tomé University of Lisbon
Albert Olioso
Albert Olioso INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa
Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa University of Alberta
Michael E. Schaepman
Michael E. Schaepman University of Zurich
Marc Pierrot-Deseilligny
Marc Pierrot-Deseilligny Gustave Eiffel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up a variety of educational routes and career opportunities. Many students begin by considering affordable options like the cheapest online general studies degree programs, which offer a broad foundation while keeping costs manageable. These programs can be ideal for those seeking flexibility and lower tuition.

For those looking to balance ease with career relevance, researching the easiest degree to get can help identify programs that combine manageable coursework with practical application, making the transition to the workforce smoother.

Specialized fields closely related to Environmental Sciences include geoscience and geology. Online students can capitalize on reputable choices by exploring the online geoscience degree programs, which cover earth systems and natural resource management, enhancing career readiness in environmental consulting or research.

Another promising pathway involves Geographic Information Systems (GIS), where professionals analyze spatial data for environmental planning. Learners interested in this tech-driven area can benefit from highly ranked gis degree programs that specialize in mapping and data analysis skills crucial to today’s environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Stéphane Jacquemoud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles