World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
36
Citations
5892
World Ranking
2802
National Ranking
1557

Gregory L. Poe publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory L. Poe sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 110 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Gregory L. Poe D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory L. Poe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory L. Poe is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, including economics, econometrics and finance, as well as environmental science, with particular focus on subfields such as economics and econometrics, ecology, nature and landscape conservation, transportation, and management science and operations research.

Their work covers a diverse range of topics including housing market and economics, fish ecology and management studies, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, ecology and biodiversity studies, economic and environmental valuation, urban transport and accessibility, and auction theory and applications.

Gregory L. Poe has contributed to the following papers:

  • The effects of aquatic invasive species on recreational fishing participation and value in the Great Lakes: Possible future scenarios (2020) published in the Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • Exploring the shelf-life of travel cost methods of valuing recreation for benefits transfer (2020) published in Resource and Energy Economics
  • Provision Point Reverse Auction: A New Auction Mechanism with Applications for Conservation Contracts (2020) published in AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
  • Corrigendum to "Exploring the shelf-life of travel cost methods of valuing recreation for benefits transfer" (2022) published in Resource and Energy Economics

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • T. Bruce Lauber
  • Richard C. Stedman
  • Nancy A. Connelly
  • Richard C. Ready
  • Lars G. Rudstam

The most common venues for Gregory L. Poe's publications are:

  • Resource and Energy Economics
  • Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)

Best Publications

  • Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions

    Gregory L. Poe;Kelly L. Giraud;John B. Loomis

  • Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach

    Michael P Welsh;Gregory L Poe

  • Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?

    Trudy Ann Cameron;Gregory L. Poe;Gregory L. Poe;Robert G. Ethier;William D. Schulze

  • Provision Point Mechanisms and Field Validity Tests of Contingent Valuation

    Gregory L. Poe;Jeremy E. Clark;Daniel Rondeau;William D. Schulze

  • Measuring the Difference (X — Y) of Simulated Distributions: A Convolutions Approach

    Gregory L. Poe;Eric K. Severance-Lossin;Michael P. Welsh

  • Voluntary revelation of the demand for public goods using a provision point mechanism

    Daniel Rondeau;William D. Schulze;Gregory L. Poe

  • The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement

    Philip Cooper;Gregory L. Poe;Ian J. Bateman

  • Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs

    Robert G. Ethier;Gregory L. Poe;William D. Schulze;Jeremy Clark

  • What Do We Know About Groundwater Values? Preliminary Implications from a Meta Analysis of Contingent-Valuation Studies

    Kevin J. Boyle;Gregory L. Poe;John C. Bergstrom

  • On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity

    Ian J Bateman;Matthew Cole;Philip Cooper;Stavros Georgiou

  • Can Hypothetical Questions Reveal True Values? A Laboratory Comparison of Dichotomous Choice and Open-Ended Contingent Values with Auction Values

    Edward J. Balistreri;Gregory L. Poe;Gary H. McClelland;William D. Schulze

  • The private provision of public goods: tests of a provision point mechanism for funding green power programs

    Steven K Rose;Jeremy Clark;Gregory L Poe;Daniel Rondeau

  • Measuring the Difference in Mean Willingness to Pay When Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Responses Are Not Independent

    Gregory L. Poe;Michael P. Welsh;Patricia A. Champ

  • VCM or PPM? A comparison of the performance of two voluntary public goods mechanisms

    Daniel Rondeau;Gregory L. Poe;William D. Schulze

  • A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs

    Robert G. Ethier;Gregory L. Poe;William D. Schulze;Jeremy Clark

  • Payment Certainty in Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Responses: Results from a Field Validity Test

    Christian A. Vossler;Robert G. Ethier;Gregory L. Poe;Michael P. Welsh

  • Exploring the Performance of Ambient-Based Policy Instruments When Nonpoint Source Polluters Can Cooperate

    Gregory L. Poe;William D. Schulze;Kathleen Segerson;Jordan F. Suter

  • COMMUNICATION AND INCENTIVE MECHANISMS BASED ON GROUP PERFORMANCE: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NONPOINT POLLUTION CONTROL

    Christian A. Vossler;Gregory L. Poe;William D. Schulze;Kathleen Segerson

  • Valuing the incremental benefits of groundwater protection when exposure levels are known

    Gregory L. Poe;Richard C. Bishop

  • Experiments on Damage-Based Ambient Taxes for Nonpoint Source Polluters

    Jordan F. Suter;Christian A. Vossler;Gregory L. Poe;Kathleen Segerson

  • The Economic Value of Water Quality

    John C. Bergstrom;Kevin J. Boyle;Gregory L. Poe

Frequent Co-Authors

William D. Schulze
William D. Schulze Cornell University
Kent D. Messer
Kent D. Messer University of Delaware
Ian J. Bateman
Ian J. Bateman University of Exeter
Richard C. Bishop
Richard C. Bishop University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kathleen Segerson
Kathleen Segerson University of Connecticut
Richard C. Stedman
Richard C. Stedman Cornell University
John C. Bergstrom
John C. Bergstrom University of Georgia
Kevin J. Boyle
Kevin J. Boyle Virginia Tech
Lars G. Rudstam
Lars G. Rudstam Cornell University
John B. Loomis
John B. Loomis Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in expanding your expertise in Economics and Finance, several related online degrees and career pathways are available. For those seeking a fast-track to advanced business roles, consider exploring our list of one year mba programs. These programs offer an intensive learning experience, allowing students to earn an MBA quickly and efficiently.

Entrepreneurs can also benefit from specialized MBAs. There are many entrepreneurship mba programs online that teach essential skills for launching and managing new ventures while providing the flexibility online learning offers.

Another pathway is project management, which is critical across industries. Reviewing the potential careers with project management degree can help you understand how this qualification opens doors to roles in finance, consulting, technology, and beyond.

For those who want to kickstart their finance careers sooner, an accelerated bachelor's degree in finance offers a streamlined route to graduation and entry into the workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory L. Poe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles