World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
86
Citations
27322
World Ranking
773
National Ranking
415

Nasir Memon publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nasir Memon sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 382 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nasir Memon D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nasir Memon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - SPIE Fellow

Overview

Nasir Memon is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans numerous subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Information Systems, and Media Technology.

The scientist's research focuses on several key topics:

  • Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Face recognition and analysis
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Digital and Cyber Forensics
  • Image Processing Techniques and Applications
  • Biometric Identification and Security

Nasir Memon's work has been published in various venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
  • IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Some recent publications include:

  • "True or False: Studying the Work Practices of Professional Fact-Checkers" (2022), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "FiFTy: Large-Scale File Fragment Type Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks" (2020), IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
  • "Information Forensics and Security: A quarter-century-long journey" (2023), IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
  • "Distinguishability of keystroke dynamic template" (2022), PLoS ONE
  • "Camera identification of multi-format devices" (2020), Pattern Recognition Letters

The scientist frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including Anubhav Jain, Chinmay Hegde, Julian Togelius, Paweł Korus, and Sudipta Banerjee.

Among professional recognitions, Nasir Memon was named an SPIE Fellow in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Context-based, adaptive, lossless image coding

    X. Wu;N. Memon

  • PassPoints: design and longitudinal evaluation of a graphical password system

    Susan Wiedenbeck;Jim Waters;Jean-Camille Birget;Alex Brodskiy

  • Resolving rightful ownerships with invisible watermarking techniques: limitations, attacks, and implications

    S. Craver;N. Memon;B.-L. Yeo;M.M. Yeung

  • Secret and public key image watermarking schemes for image authentication and ownership verification

    Ping Wah Wong;N. Memon

  • Steganalysis using image quality metrics

    I. Avcibas;N. Memon;B. Sankur

  • An efficient and robust method for detecting copy-move forgery

    Sevinc Bayram;Husrev Taha Sencar;Nasir Memon

  • Analysis of LSB based image steganography techniques

    R. Chandramouli;N. Memon

  • Counterfeiting attacks on oblivious block-wise independent invisible watermarking schemes

    M. Holliman;N. Memon

  • Using host symptoms, host roles, and/or host reputation for detection of host infection

    Nasir Memon;Kulesh Shanmugasundaram

  • Authentication using graphical passwords: effects of tolerance and image choice

    Susan Wiedenbeck;Jim Waters;Jean-Camille Birget;Alex Brodskiy

  • A buyer-seller watermarking protocol

    N. Memon;Ping Wah Wong

  • Source camera identification based on CFA interpolation

    S. Bayram;H. Sencar;N. Memon;I. Avcibas

  • Blind source camera identification

    Mehdi Kharrazi;H. T. Sencar;N. Memon

  • Protecting digital media content

    Nasir Memon;Ping Wah Wong

  • Image Steganography and Steganalysis: Concepts and Practice

    Rajarathnam Chandramouli;Mehdi Kharrazi;Nasir D. Memon

  • Biometric-rich gestures: a novel approach to authentication on multi-touch devices

    Napa Sae-Bae;Kowsar Ahmed;Katherine Isbister;Nasir Memon

  • Modeling user choice in the PassPoints graphical password scheme

    Ahmet Emir Dirik;Nasir Memon;Jean-Camille Birget

  • Image steganalysis with binary similarity measures

    Ismail Avcibaş;Mehdi Kharrazi;Nasir Memon;Bülent Sankur

  • Can invisible watermarks resolve rightful ownerships

    Scott A. Craver;Nasir D. Memon;Boon-Lock Yeo;Minerva M. Yeung

  • Protecting Biometric Templates With Sketch: Theory and Practice

    Yagiz Sutcu;Qiming Li;N. Memon

Frequent Co-Authors

Khalid Sayood
Khalid Sayood University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Bulent Sankur
Bulent Sankur Boğaziçi University
Xiaolin Wu
Xiaolin Wu McMaster University
Edward J. Delp
Edward J. Delp Purdue University West Lafayette
Suk Ho Chung
Suk Ho Chung King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Bernard H. Kear
Bernard H. Kear Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Torsten Suel
Torsten Suel New York University
Jana Dittmann
Jana Dittmann Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Dalaver H. Anjum
Dalaver H. Anjum Khalifa University
Rashid Ansari
Rashid Ansari University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science opens many doors—whether you’re just starting out or looking to advance your career. Many professionals explore 2 year online degrees to quickly gain foundational skills and enter the tech workforce sooner. These programs are convenient for those balancing other obligations while seeking a high-demand credential.

For those aiming to boost their expertise, choosing the best masters degree to get can lead to greater job prospects and higher salaries. Many top online graduate programs now offer flexible study options, with several online graduate schools with low gpa requirements making advanced education more accessible than ever.

Cost is an important consideration. Fortunately, you can find affordable online colleges that deliver high-quality programs without compromising your budget. With so many pathways and options to choose from, studying Computer Science online in the USA is more attainable and flexible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Nasir Memon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles