World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6033
World Ranking
11191
National Ranking
564

Jana Dittmann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Dittmann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 336 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jana Dittmann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Dittmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jana Dittmann is affiliated with Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg in Germany. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Computer Science, with a total of 61 publications across various subfields.

The main subfields of study for their work include Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Information Systems, and Computer Networks and Communications. The scientist's research topics focus on Digital Media Forensic Detection, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, Biometric Identification and Security, Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications, Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques, and Face Recognition and Analysis.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Media Forensics Considerations on DeepFake Detection with Hand-Crafted Features (2021, Journal of Imaging)
  • A Survey on Synthetic Biometrics: Fingerprint, Face, Iris and Vascular Patterns (2023, IEEE Access)
  • Assessment of Hidden Channel Attacks: Targetting Modbus/TCP (2020, IFAC-PapersOnLine)
  • Media Forensic Considerations of the Usage of Artificial Intelligence Using the Example of DeepFake Detection (2024, Journal of Imaging)
  • Forensic data model for artificial intelligence based media forensics - Illustrated on the example of DeepFake detection (2022, Electronic Imaging)

Their frequent coauthors comprise Christian Kraetzer, Claus Vielhauer, Stefan Seidlitz, Andrey Makrushin, and Kevin Lamshöft.

Jana Dittmann has published extensively in the following venues:

  • Electronic Imaging
  • Journal of Imaging
  • EURASIP Journal on Information Security
  • Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD
  • IEEE Access

Best Publications

  • Security threats to automotive CAN networks—Practical examples and selected short-term countermeasures

    Tobias Hoppe;Stefan Kiltz;Jana Dittmann

  • Content-based digital signature for motion pictures authentication and content-fragile watermarking

    J. Dittmann;A. Steinmetz;R. Steinmetz

  • Public automated web-based evaluation service for watermarking schemes: StirMark benchmark

    Fabien A. P. Petitcolas;Martin Steinebach;Frederic Raynal;Jana Dittmann

  • Digital audio forensics: a first practical evaluation on microphone and environment classification

    Christian Kraetzer;Andrea Oermann;Jana Dittmann;Andreas Lang

  • Robust MPEG video watermarking technologies

    Jana Dittmann;Mark Stabenau;Ralf Steinmetz

  • Automatic Generation and Detection of Visually Faultless Facial Morphs

    Andrey Makrushin;Tom Neubert;Jana Dittmann

  • Benchmarking of image watermarking algorithms for digital rights management

    B. Macq;J. Dittmann;E.J. Delp

  • Protecting VoD the easier way

    Carsten Griwodz;Oliver Merkel;Jana Dittmann;Ralf Steinmetz

  • Communications and Multimedia Security

    Bart De Decker;Jana Dittmann;Christian Kraetzer;Claus Vielhauer

  • Microphone Classification Using Fourier Coefficients

    Robert Buchholz;Christian Kraetzer;Jana Dittmann

  • Combining digital watermarks and collusion-secure fingerprints for digital images

    Jana Dittmann;Alexander Behr;Mark Stabenau;Peter Schmitt

  • Mel-cepstrum-based steganalysis for VoIP steganography

    Christian Kraetzer;Jana Dittmann

  • Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for digital images

    Jana Dittmann;Peter Schmitt;Eva Saar;Jo¨rg Schwenk

  • Steganography and steganalysis in voice-over IP scenarios: operational aspects and first experiences with a new steganalysis tool set

    Jana Dittmann;Danny Hesse;Reyk Hillert

  • Extended StirTrace benchmarking of biometric and forensic qualities of morphed face images

    Tom Neubert;Andrey Makrushin;Mario Hildebrandt;Christian Kraetzer

  • Modeling Attacks on Photo-ID Documents and Applying Media Forensics for the Detection of Facial Morphing

    Christian Kraetzer;Andrey Makrushin;Tom Neubert;Mario Hildebrandt

  • Using adapted Levenshtein distance for on-line signature authentication

    S. Schimke;C. Vielhauer;J. Dittmann

  • Design and evaluation of steganography for voice-over-IP

    C. Kratzer;J. Dittmann;T. Vogel;R. Hillert

  • WLAN steganography: a first practical review

    Christian Krätzer;Jana Dittmann;Andreas Lang;Tobias Kühne

  • Using cryptographic and. watermarking algorithms

    J. Dittmann;P. Wohlmacher;K. Nahrstedt

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Katzenbeisser
Stefan Katzenbeisser University of Passau
Edward J. Delp
Edward J. Delp Purdue University West Lafayette
Ralf Steinmetz
Ralf Steinmetz Technical University of Darmstadt
Nasir Memon
Nasir Memon New York University
Gunter Saake
Gunter Saake Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Jessica Fridrich
Jessica Fridrich Binghamton University
Klara Nahrstedt
Klara Nahrstedt University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ingemar J. Cox
Ingemar J. Cox University College London
Andreas Uhl
Andreas Uhl University of Salzburg
Ton Kalker
Ton Kalker Hewlett-Packard (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in computer science can open many doors for students and professionals alike. Flexible and accessible, online programs allow learners to earn valuable credentials and build essential tech skills from anywhere in the world.

Several paths are available depending on your career goals and academic background. If you’re just starting out, online associates programs offer a convenient and cost-effective way to learn core computing concepts and prepare for entry-level roles in IT or software support.

For those looking to advance or specialize, pursuing one of the best masters degree to get in the field, such as data science, cybersecurity, or artificial intelligence, can lead to higher salaries and greater job opportunities.

Cost and admission requirements are also key considerations. Many affordable online colleges help students earn a respected degree without overwhelming debt. Additionally, online schools that accept low gpa make higher education accessible to more learners, regardless of past academic performance.

Best Scientists Citing Jana Dittmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles