World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
8834
World Ranking
6416
National Ranking
3477

Sheldon Zedeck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sheldon Zedeck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sheldon Zedeck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sheldon Zedeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1977 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Sheldon Zedeck is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their academic and research career is distinguished by recognition such as being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1977.

Although specific publications, co-authors, and detailed research topics are not listed, this fellowship implies substantial contributions to the field of psychology, as the APA fellowship is awarded to professionals who have demonstrated unusual and outstanding contributions or performance in the field.

Information about their recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main research topics is not provided. Therefore, no further details on these aspects can be summarized.

Best Publications

  • Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences

    Gregory C. Elliott;Edwin E. Ghiselli;John P. Campbell;Sheldon Zedeck

  • Problems with the use of "moderator" variables.

    Sheldon Zedeck

  • Relations Between Measures of Typical and Maximum Job Performance

    Paul R. Sackett;Sheldon Zedeck;Larry Fogli

  • Data Analysis for Research Designs : Analysis of Variance and Multiple Regression/correlation Approaches

    Geoffrey Keppel;Sheldon Zedeck

  • Work in the family and employing organization.

    Sheldon Zedeck;Kathleen L. Mosier

  • Work, Families, and Organizations

    Sheldon Zedeck

  • FORTY QUESTIONS ABOUT VALIDITY GENERALIZATION AND META‐ANALYSIS

    Frank L. Schmidt;John E. Hunter;Kenneth Pearlman;Hannah Rothstein Hirsh

  • EXPECTATIONS OF BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES

    Rick Jacobs;Ditsa Kafry;Sheldon Zedeck

  • An information processing model and approach to the study of motivation

    Sheldon Zedeck

  • Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: definitional issues, prediction, and White−Black differences

    Cathy L.Z. DuBois;Paul R Sackett;Sheldon Zedeck;Larry Fogli

  • Capturing rater policies for processing evaluation data.

    Sheldon Zedeck;Ditsa Kafry

  • Performance Appraisal Decisions as a Function of Rater Training and Purpose of the Appraisal

    Sheldon Zedeck;Wayne F. Cascio

  • Performance Measurement and Theory

    Frank Landy;Sheldon Zedeck;Jeanette Cleveland

  • Introduction: Exploring the domain of work and family concerns.

    Sheldon Zedeck

  • Interviewer Validity and Reliability: An Individual Analysis Approach.

    Sheldon Zedeck;Aharon Tziner;Susan E. Middlestadt

  • APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization.

    Sheldon Zedeck

  • Statistical Implications of Six Methods of Test Score Use in Personnel Selection

    Wayne F. Cascio;James Outtz;Sheldon Zedeck;Irwin L. Goldstein

  • Psychological issues in personnel decisions.

    S Zedeck;W F Cascio

  • THE CONTROVERSY OVER SCORE BANDING IN PERSONNEL SELECTION: ANSWERS TO 10 KEY QUESTIONS

    Michael A Campion;James L. Outtz;Sheldon Zedeck;Frank L. Schmidt

  • Explaining performance variability: Contributions of goal setting, task characteristics, and evaluative contexts.

    Susan E. Jackson;Sheldon Zedeck

  • Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences.

    Neal Schmitt;Edwin E. Ghiselli;John P. Campbell;Sheldon Zedeck

  • High-Involvement Management.

    Sheldon Zedeck

  • Fairness in Employment Testing: Validity Generalization, Minority Issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery.

    Sheldon Zedeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne F. Cascio
Wayne F. Cascio University of Colorado Denver
Susan E. Jackson
Susan E. Jackson Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Paul R. Sackett
Paul R. Sackett University of Minnesota
Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University
Frank L. Schmidt
Frank L. Schmidt University of Iowa
Christina Maslach
Christina Maslach University of California, Berkeley
Susan E. Middlestadt
Susan E. Middlestadt Indiana University
Richard R. Reilly
Richard R. Reilly Stevens Institute of Technology
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Michael A. Campion
Michael A. Campion Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding online programs and career pathways, especially in the rapidly growing field of mental health counseling. Many students are choosing online degrees to access flexible learning and accredited programs tailored to today’s healthcare needs.

When thinking about potential career opportunities, requirements can vary depending on your location. For example, you can learn how to become a mental health counselor in Philadelphia or explore steps to become a mental health counselor in Phoenix. Each region has unique licensure, education, and supervised experience expectations.

Additionally, understanding Pittsburgh mental health counselor certification requirements or investigating Plano mental health counselor education requirements can help clarify the credentials you’ll need. Exploring these pathways will ensure you’re well-informed to meet local standards and launch a meaningful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Sheldon Zedeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles