What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Duncan McCargo mostly deals with Politics, Political economy, Law, Economic history and General election.
In the subject of general Politics, his work in Democracy is often linked to Construct, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
Duncan McCargo works mostly in the field of Democracy, limiting it down to topics relating to Absolute monarchy and, in certain cases, Polity, Constitutional monarchy, Parliament and Legitimacy, as a part of the same area of interest.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Economic growth, Legislation, Tobacco industry and Alliance.
Duncan McCargo interconnects Development economics, Ancient history and Islam in the investigation of issues within Economic history.
His work focuses on many connections between General election and other disciplines, such as Constitution, that overlap with his field of interest in Proportional representation, Opposition, Authoritarianism, Good governance and Liberalization.
His most cited work include:
- Network monarchy and legitimacy crises in Thailand (190 citations)
- The Thaksinization of Thailand (121 citations)
- Tearing Apart the Land: Islam and Legitimacy in Southern Thailand (111 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Politics, Political economy, Law, Gender studies and Democracy.
Duncan McCargo studies Legitimacy which is a part of Politics.
His Political economy research focuses on subjects like Elite, which are linked to Political violence.
His Gender studies research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Identity, Social science and Nationalism.
His work on Democratization and Authoritarianism is typically connected to Religious studies as part of general Democracy study, connecting several disciplines of science.
His Constitution research focuses on Economic history and how it connects with General election.
He most often published in these fields:
- Politics (56.25%)
- Political economy (28.12%)
- Law (28.12%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?
- Politics (56.25%)
- Law (28.12%)
- Political economy (28.12%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Politics, Law, Political economy, Media studies and Democracy.
He has included themes like Economic Justice and Power in his Politics study.
His Political economy study combines topics in areas such as Economic growth, Elite, Opposition and State.
As a part of the same scientific study, Duncan McCargo usually deals with the Media studies, concentrating on Populism and frequently concerns with Social media, Electronic media, Public sphere and New media.
His Democracy research incorporates themes from Critical discourse analysis, Grassroots and Economy.
As a member of one scientific family, Duncan McCargo mostly works in the field of Monarchy, focusing on Institution and, on occasion, Ethical code and Economic history.
Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Diglossia and identity in Northeast Thailand: Linguistic, social, and political hierarchy (16 citations)
- Ordering Peace: Thailand's 2016 Constitutional Referendum (15 citations)
- Competing Notions of Judicialization in Thailand (13 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Law, Politics, Prime minister, Charter and Constitution are his primary areas of study.
His study in the fields of Fact-finding, Annulment, Power and Judicial activism under the domain of Law overlaps with other disciplines such as Conciliation.
He frequently studies issues relating to Commission and Politics.
His Prime minister study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Economic growth, Migrant workers and Polarization.
His Charter research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Scrutiny, Legalism, Democracy and Suppression of dissent.
Duncan McCargo interconnects Political system, Constitutionalism and Referendum in the investigation of issues within Constitution.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
