World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6062
World Ranking
7766
National Ranking
2765

Michael D. Annable publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Annable sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 194 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Michael D. Annable D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Annable sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael D. Annable is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within environmental science and earth and planetary sciences.

The main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Their subfields cover several specialized disciplines such as:

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Key topics in their work are:

  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

The scientist has contributed to several publication venues, with multiple papers in some journals:

  • Journal of Contaminant Hydrology (3 publications)
  • Water (2 publications)
  • Environmental Science & Technology (1 publication)
  • Water Research (1 publication)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences (1 publication)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael D. Annable include:

  • "Concentrating Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Leachate Using Foam Separation", 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Natural attenuation of a chlorinated ethene plume discharging to a stream: Integrated assessment of hydrogeological, chemical and microbial interactions", 2020, Water Research
  • "Disaggregating Landscape-Scale Nitrogen Attenuation Along Hydrological Flow Paths", 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • "Analysis of Facilitated Air Intrusion during Surfactant-enhanced Air Sparging Using Surface Tension-reducing Chemicals: Surfactants and Alcohols", 2021, Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal
  • "Aquifer remediation using surfactant-enhanced gas sparging applied to target the contaminant source", 2022, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • James W. Jawitz
  • Heonki Kim
  • Moon-Young Cho
  • Min-Su Oh
  • Jay Cho

Best Publications

  • Biochar for volatile organic compound (VOC) removal: Sorption performance and governing mechanisms

    Xueyang Zhang;Bin Gao;Yulin Zheng;Xin Hu

  • Field-scale evaluation of in situ cosolvent flushing for enhanced aquifer remediation

    P. Suresh C. Rao;Michael D. Annable;Randall K. Sillan;Dongping Dai

  • Determination of effective air-water interfacial area in partially saturated porous media using surfactant adsorption

    Heonki Kim;P. Suresh C. Rao;Michael D. Annable

  • PARTITIONING TRACERS FOR MEASURING RESIDUAL NAPL: FIELD-SCALE TEST RESULTS

    Michael D. Annable;P. S. C. Rao;Kirk Hatfield;Wendy D. Graham

  • A direct passive method for measuring water and contaminant fluxes in porous media

    Kirk Hatfield;Michael Annable;Michael Annable;Jaehyun Cho;Jaehyun Cho;P.S.C. Rao

  • Field Implementation of a Winsor Type I Surfactant/Alcohol Mixture for in Situ Solubilization of a Complex LNAPL as a Single-Phase Microemulsion

    James W. Jawitz;Michael D. Annable;P. S. C. Rao;R. Dean Rhue

  • In-situ alcohol flushing of a DNAPL source zone at a dry cleaner site.

    J. W. Jawitz;R. K. Sillan;M. D. Annable;P. S. C. Rao

  • DNAPL source depletion: linking architecture and flux response.

    Adrian D. Fure;James W. Jawitz;Michael D. Annable

  • Field-scale evaluation of the passive flux meter for simultaneous measurement of groundwater and contaminant fluxes.

    Michael D. Annable;Kirk Hatfield;Jaehyun Cho;Harald Klammler

  • Measurement of Specific Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Areas of Immiscible Fluids in Porous Media

    K. Prasad Saripalli;Heonki Kim;P. Suresh C. Rao;Michael D. Annable

  • Fundamental Changes in In Situ Air Sparging How Patterns

    Michael C. Brooks;William R. Wise;Michael D. Annable

  • Degradation of perchloroethylene in cosolvent solutions by zero-valent iron.

    Clayton J. Clark;P.S.C. Rao;Michael D. Annable

  • NAPL source zone characterization and remediation technology performance assessment: recent developments and applications of tracer techniques

    P.Suresh C Rao;P.Suresh C Rao;Michael D Annable;Heonki Kim

  • Field Evaluation of Interfacial and Partitioning Tracers for Characterization of Effective NAPL‐Water Contact Areas

    M.D. Annable;J.W. Jawitz;P.S.C. Rao;D.P. Dai

  • Field demonstration of surfactant-enhanced solubilization of DNAPL at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware.

    Jeffrey Childs;Edgar Acosta;Michael D. Annable;Michael C. Brooks

  • Flux-based assessment at a manufacturing site contaminated with trichloroethylene

    Nandita B. Basu;P.S.C. Rao;Irene C. Poyer;M.D. Annable

  • Determination of specific NAPL–water interfacial areas of residual NAPLs in porous media using the interfacial tracers technique

    K.Prasad Saripalli;P.S.C Rao;M.D Annable

  • Characterization of a heterogeneous DNAPL source zone in the Borden aquifer using partitioning and interfacial tracers: Residual morphologies and background sorption

    Niels Hartog;Jaehyun Cho;Beth L. Parker;Michael D. Annable

  • Gaseous Tracer Technique for Estimating Air–Water Interfacial Areas and Interface Mobility

    Heonki Kim;P. Suresh C. Rao;Michael D. Annable

  • Process-based reactive transport model to quantify arsenic mobility during aquifer storage and recovery of potable water.

    Ilka Wallis;Henning Prommer;Thomas Pichler;Vincent Post

  • Technology integration for contaminated site remediation: clean-up goals and performance criteria.

    P. Suresh C. Rao;James W. Jawitz;Carl G. Enfield;Ronald W. Falta

Frequent Co-Authors

James W. Jawitz
James W. Jawitz University of Florida
P. Suresh C. Rao
P. Suresh C. Rao Purdue University West Lafayette
Wendy D. Graham
Wendy D. Graham University of Florida
Poul Løgstrup Bjerg
Poul Løgstrup Bjerg Technical University of Denmark
Beth L. Parker
Beth L. Parker University of Guelph
John A. Cherry
John A. Cherry University of Guelph
Nandita B. Basu
Nandita B. Basu University of Waterloo
Michael Rode
Michael Rode Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Ronald W. Falta
Ronald W. Falta Clemson University
Philip John Binning
Philip John Binning Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, numerous online degree options offer flexible learning paths. For example, educators looking to advance can explore some of the best online eds to edd programs, which provide specialized leadership skills for impactful careers in academia and administration.

Social work professionals may also benefit from accredited programs like the dsw online programs. These doctorates prepare graduates to address environmental justice and community health—key issues connected to environmental sciences.

If affordability and versatility are priorities, pursuing a cheap online general studies degree can offer a broad foundation that supports various environmental careers without the burden of high tuition fees.

Additionally, for those looking to enter the workforce quickly or complement existing skills, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify accessible pathways into fields related to environmental science, such as sustainability, resource management, or policy.

Best Scientists Citing Michael D. Annable

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles