World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 65 942 868 72 71 189 13296

Shaohua Li publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shaohua Li between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shaohua Li published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 14 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 8 publications
2003 2025

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shaohua Li: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 9
2007 9
2008 8
2009 13
2010 8
2011 9
2012 18
2013 26
2014 16
2015 8
2016 14
2017 8
2018 6
2019 16
2020 13
2021 20
2022 8
2023 10
2024 6
2025 8
Total 236
Download as CSV

Shaohua Li publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaohua Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 186–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 189 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114 189
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Shaohua Li D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaohua Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58 65
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • DNA

Shaohua Li mainly investigates Botany, Genome, Gene, Horticulture and Cultivar. His Botany study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Fructose, Malic acid, Sugar and Sucrose. When carried out as part of a general Genome research project, his work on Whole genome sequencing and Genome editing is frequently linked to work in Retrotransposon, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.

Gene and Nelumbo are frequently intertwined in his study. His studies deal with areas such as Flavonoid, Quercetin, Nelumbo nucifera and Gynoecium as well as Horticulture. His studies in Cultivar integrate themes in fields like Wine and Germplasm.

His most cited work include:

  • Genome of the long-living sacred lotus ( Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) (237 citations)
  • Salicylic acid pretreatment alleviates chilling injury and affects the antioxidant system and heat shock proteins of peaches during cold storage (209 citations)
  • Nelumbo nucifera [data set] (190 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Shaohua Li mostly deals with Botany, Gene, Horticulture, Berry and Cultivar. The various areas that he examines in his Botany study include Sugar and Food science. Genetics covers Shaohua Li research in Gene.

In the field of Horticulture, his study on Flesh overlaps with subjects such as Sunlight and Chemical composition. His Berry research includes elements of Biochemistry, Resveratrol and Anthocyanin. As part of one scientific family, Shaohua Li deals mainly with the area of Cultivar, narrowing it down to issues related to the Terpenoid, and often Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (51.28%)
  • Gene (28.85%)
  • Horticulture (26.28%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Gene (28.85%)
  • Genetics (16.03%)
  • Vitis amurensis (9.62%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Gene, Genetics, Vitis amurensis, Cell biology and Transcriptome. Gene is a component of his Genome, Mutant, CRISPR, Phytoene desaturase and Cas9 studies. Shaohua Li has included themes like Gene duplication and Sequence assembly in his Genome study.

His study on Genetics is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Wine. His Vitis amurensis research incorporates themes from Transcription factor, Arabidopsis, Horticulture, Quantitative trait locus and Heritability. His Transcriptome research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Abiotic stress, Function and Gene family.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Knockout of VvCCD8 gene in grapevine affects shoot branching. (7 citations)
  • Transcriptomic Analysis of the Grapevine LEA Gene Family in Response to Osmotic and Cold Stress Reveals a Key Role for VamDHN3. (5 citations)
  • A key 'foxy' aroma gene is regulated by homology-induced promoter indels in the iconic juice grape 'Concord'. (3 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • DNA

His primary scientific interests are in Gene, Genetics, Vitis amurensis, Cell biology and Arabidopsis. The study incorporates disciplines such as Shoot, Herbaceous plant and Carotenoid in addition to Gene. His study in Genetics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Aroma, Wine grape and Methyl anthranilate.

His work carried out in the field of Vitis amurensis brings together such families of science as Polygene, Breeding program and Interspecific competition. The concepts of his Cell biology study are interwoven with issues in Jasmonic acid, Transcription factor and Abscisic acid. His Arabidopsis study combines topics in areas such as Methyl jasmonate, Wine and Drought tolerance.

Best Publications

  • Genome of the long-living sacred lotus ( Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.)

    Ray Ming;Ray Ming;Robert VanBuren;Yanling Liu;Mei Yang

  • Salicylic acid pretreatment alleviates chilling injury and affects the antioxidant system and heat shock proteins of peaches during cold storage

    Lijun Wang;Shuangjian Chen;Weifu Kong;Shaohua Li

  • Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under heat stress and accelerates recovery in grapevine leaves

    Li Jun Wang;Ling Fan;Ling Fan;Wayne Loescher;Wei Duan

  • Berry ripening: recently heard through the grapevine

    Nathalie Kuhn;Le Guan;Le Guan;Zhan Wu Dai;Ben-Hong Wu

  • Salicylic acid-induced heat or cold tolerance in relation to Ca2+ homeostasis and antioxidant systems in young grape plants

    Li-Jun Wang;Shao-Hua Li

  • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera L.).

    Chong Ren;Xianju Liu;Zhan Zhang;Yi Wang

  • Nelumbo nucifera [data set]

    Ray Ming;Robert Vanburen;Yanling Liu;Mei Yang

  • Anthocyanin composition and content in grape berry skin in Vitis germplasm

    Zhenchang Liang;Benhong Wu;Peige Fan;Chunxiang Yang

  • Sugar and acid concentrations in 98 grape cultivars analyzed by principal component analysis

    Huai-Feng Liu;Huai-Feng Liu;Ben-Hong Wu;Pei-Ge Fan;Shao-Hua Li

  • Comparative assessment of sugar and malic acid composition in cultivated and wild apples.

    Baiquan Ma;Jie Chen;Hongyu Zheng;Ting Fang

  • Volatile characteristics of 50 peaches and nectarines evaluated by HP-SPME with GC-MS

    Yiju Wang;Chunxiang Yang;Shaohua Li;Liu Yang

  • Comprehensive analysis of NAC domain transcription factor gene family in Vitis vinifera

    Nian Wang;Yu Zheng;Haiping Xin;Linchuan Fang

  • Genome-wide identification of WRKY family genes and their response to cold stress in Vitis vinifera

    Lina Wang;Wei Zhu;Linchuan Fang;Xiaoming Sun

  • Whole-genome resequencing of 472 Vitis accessions for grapevine diversity and demographic history analyses

    Zhenchang Liang;Shengchang Duan;Jun Sheng;Shusheng Zhu

  • A genome for gnetophytes and early evolution of seed plants.

    Tao Wan;Zhi-Ming Liu;Ling-Fei Li;Andrew R Leitch

  • Integrating Omics and Alternative Splicing Reveals Insights into Grape Response to High Temperature.

    Jianfu Jiang;Xinna Liu;Chonghuai Liu;Guotian Liu

  • Overexpression of VaPAT1, a GRAS transcription factor from Vitis amurensis, confers abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis

    Yangyang Yuan;Linchuan Fang;Sospeter Karanja Karungo;Langlang Zhang

  • Transcriptomic analysis of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves during and after recovery from heat stress

    Guo-Tian Liu;Jun-Fang Wang;Grant Cramer;Zhan-Wu Dai

  • Ethylene positively regulates cold tolerance in grapevine by modulating the expression of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 057.

    Xiaoming Sun;Tingting Zhao;Shuheng Gan;Xiaodie Ren

  • Differential proteomic analysis of grapevine leaves by iTRAQ reveals responses to heat stress and subsequent recovery

    Guo-Tian Liu;Ling Ma;Wei Duan;Bai-Chen Wang

  • Volatiles of grape berries evaluated at the germplasm level by headspace-SPME with GC-MS

    Chunxiang Yang;Yiju Wang;Zhenchang Liang;Peige Fan

  • Construction of a high-density genetic map for grape using next generation restriction-site associated DNA sequencing

    Nian Wang;Linchuan Fang;Haiping Xin;Lijun Wang

  • A novel system for evaluating drought–cold tolerance of grapevines using chlorophyll fluorescence

    Lingye Su;Zhanwu Dai;Shaohua Li;Haiping Xin

  • Genome Wide Transcriptional Profile Analysis of Vitis amurensis and Vitis vinifera in Response to Cold Stress

    Haiping Xin;Wei Zhu;Lina Wang;Yue Xiang

  • Simultaneous qualitative assessment and quantitative analysis of flavonoids in various tissues of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quad mass spectrometry

    Sha Chen;Linchuan Fang;Huifen Xi;Le Guan

  • Systematic qualitative and quantitative assessment of anthocyanins, flavones and flavonols in the petals of 108 lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) cultivars.

    Jiao Deng;Sha Chen;Xiaojian Yin;Kun Wang

  • Expression of Vitis amurensis NAC26 in Arabidopsis enhances drought tolerance by modulating jasmonic acid synthesis

    Linchuan Fang;Lingye Su;Xiaoming Sun;Xinbo Li

  • Analysis of flavonoids from lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) leaves using high performance liquid chromatography/photodiode array detector tandem electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and an extraction method optimized by orthogonal design.

    Sha Chen;Ben-Hong Wu;Jin-Bao Fang;Yan-Ling Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhenchang Liang
Zhenchang Liang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zhanwu Dai
Zhanwu Dai Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yuepeng Han
Yuepeng Han Wuhan Botanical Garden
Ray Ming
Ray Ming University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michel Génard
Michel Génard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Grant R. Cramer
Grant R. Cramer University of Nevada Reno
Serge Delrot
Serge Delrot University of Bordeaux
Ramanjulu Sunkar
Ramanjulu Sunkar Oklahoma State University
John E. Bowers
John E. Bowers University of Georgia
Eric Gomès
Eric Gomès University of Bordeaux

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Shaohua Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles