World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
62
Citations
17624
World Ranking
1078
National Ranking
292

Grant R. Cramer publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant R. Cramer sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 116 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Grant R. Cramer D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant R. Cramer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

Grant R. Cramer mostly deals with Botany, Biochemistry, Molar concentration, Shoot and Horticulture. Grant R. Cramer undertakes interdisciplinary study in the fields of Botany and Elongation through his research. His research in Biochemistry intersects with topics in Biophysics and Berry.

His work is dedicated to discovering how Shoot, Photosynthesis are connected with Nitrogen assimilation, Metabolite and Protein metabolism and other disciplines. His Horticulture study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Soil salinity and Cell Enlargement. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Flavor, Wine, Water deficit and Abscisic acid.

His most cited work include:

  • Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing (859 citations)
  • Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective (665 citations)
  • Displacement of Ca2+ by Na+ from the Plasmalemma of Root Cells A Primary Response to Salt Stress? (589 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Horticulture, Shoot, Abscisic acid and Gene. The study incorporates disciplines such as Transcriptome and Water deficit in addition to Botany. Grant R. Cramer combines subjects such as Poaceae and Agronomy with his study of Horticulture.

In his study, Hordeum vulgare and Ion transporter is inextricably linked to Animal science, which falls within the broad field of Shoot. His Abscisic acid research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Ecophysiology, Plant physiology, Xylem, Genotype and Drought tolerance. His research integrates issues of Vineyard, Ripening, Biochemistry and Wine grape in his study of Berry.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (55.96%)
  • Horticulture (24.77%)
  • Shoot (21.10%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Botany (55.96%)
  • Gene (17.43%)
  • Abscisic acid (20.18%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Grant R. Cramer mainly investigates Botany, Gene, Abscisic acid, Berry and Ripening. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Transcriptome and Water deficit. His research in the fields of Gene expression and Biotic stress overlaps with other disciplines such as Library science.

His Abscisic acid study contributes to a more complete understanding of Biochemistry. His Berry research integrates issues from Vineyard, Cultivar and Metabolomics. He has included themes like Anthesis, Abiotic stress and Turgor pressure in his Ripening study.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing (859 citations)
  • Proteomic analysis indicates massive changes in metabolism prior to the inhibition of growth and photosynthesis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in response to water deficit (98 citations)
  • The Basic Leucine Zipper Transcription Factor ABSCISIC ACID RESPONSE ELEMENT-BINDING FACTOR2 Is an Important Transcriptional Regulator of Abscisic Acid-Dependent Grape Berry Ripening Processes (76 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • Botany

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Abscisic acid, Transcription factor, Transcriptome and Berry. The various areas that he examines in his Botany study include Water deficit and Metabolism. The Abscisic acid study combines topics in areas such as Cell wall and Anthesis.

His study in Transcription factor is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Ripening and Abiotic stress. His work in Berry addresses issues such as Primary metabolite, which are connected to fields such as Phenology. His work carried out in the field of Biochemistry brings together such families of science as Anthocyanin and Metabolomics.

Best Publications

  • Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing

    Chen-Shan Chin;Paul Peluso;Fritz J Sedlazeck;Maria Nattestad

  • Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective

    Grant R Cramer;Kaoru Urano;Serge Delrot;Mario Pezzotti

  • Displacement of ca by na from the plasmalemma of root cells : a primary response to salt stress?

    Grant R. Cramer;André Läuchli;Vito S. Polito

  • Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles.

    Grant R. Cramer;Ali Ergül;Jerome Grimplet;Richard L. Tillett

  • Water deficit alters differentially metabolic pathways affecting important flavor and quality traits in grape berries of Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay

    Laurent G Deluc;David R Quilici;Alain Decendit;Jérôme Grimplet

  • Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development.

    Laurent G Deluc;Jérôme Grimplet;Matthew D Wheatley;Richard L Tillett

  • Regulation of malate metabolism in grape berry and other developing fruits

    Crystal Sweetman;Laurent G. Deluc;Grant R. Cramer;Christopher M. Ford

  • Influx of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ into Roots of Salt-Stressed Cotton Seedlings Effects of Supplemental Ca2+

    Grant R. Cramer;Jonathan Lynch;André Läuchli;Emanuel Epstein

  • Effects of NaCl and CaCl2 on ion activities in complex nutrient solutions and root growth of cotton

    Grant R. Cramer;André Läuchli;Emanuel Epstein

  • Maximal Biomass of Arabidopsis thaliana Using a Simple, Low-Maintenance Hydroponic Method and Favorable Environmental Conditions

    David M. Gibeaut;John Hulett;Grant R. Cramer;Jeffrey R. Seemann

  • Sodium-Calcium Interactions Under Salinity Stress

    Grant R. Cramer

  • Salt tolerance is not associated with the sodium accumulation of two maize hybrids

    G.R. Cramer;G.J. Alberico;C. Schmidt

  • Tissue-specific mRNA expression profiling in grape berry tissues

    Jerome Grimplet;Laurent G Deluc;Richard L Tillett;Matthew D Wheatley

  • EFfects of NaCl and CaCl2 on cell enlargement and cell production in cotton roots

    Eva Kurth;Grant R. Cramer;André Läuchli;Emanuel Epstein

  • Proteomic analysis reveals differences between Vitis vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and their responses to water deficit and salinity

    Delphine Vincent;Ali Ergül;Marlene C. Bohlman;Elizabeth A. R. Tattersall

  • Water relations and leaf expansion: importance of time scale

    Rana Munns;John B. Passioura;Jianmin Guo;Ofer Chazen

  • Effects of sodium, potassium and calcium on salt‐stressed barley. I. Growth analysis

    Grant R. Cramer;Emanuel Epstein;Andre Lauchli

  • Effects of sodium, potassium and calcium on salt-stressed barley. II. Elemental analysis

    Grant R. Cramer;Emanuel Epstein;Andre Lauchli

  • Salinity Reduces Membrane-Associated Calcium in Corn Root Protoplasts

    Jonathan Lynch;Grant R. Cramer;André Läuchli

  • Na‐Ca interactions in barley seedlings: relationship to ion transport and growth

    G. Cramer;E. Epstein;A. Läuchli

  • Characterizing the Grape Transcriptome. Analysis of Expressed Sequence Tags from Multiple Vitis Species and Development of a Compendium of Gene Expression during Berry Development

    Francisco Goes da Silva;Alberto Iandolino;Fadi Al-Kayal;Marlene C. Bohlmann

  • Kinetics of Maize Leaf Elongation III. Silver Thiosulfate Increases the Yield Threshold of Salt-Stressed Plants, but Ethylene Is Not Involved

    Grant R. Cramer

  • Abscisic acid is correlated with the leaf growth inhibition of four genotypes of maize differing in their response to salinity.

    Grant R Cramer;Steve A Quarrie

  • Proteomic and selected metabolite analysis of grape berry tissues under well-watered and water-deficit stress conditions

    Jérôme Grimplet;Matthew D. Wheatley;Hatem Ben Jouira;Laurent G. Deluc

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Cushman
John C. Cushman University of Nevada Reno
André Läuchli
André Läuchli University of California, Davis
Serge Delrot
Serge Delrot University of Bordeaux
Aaron Fait
Aaron Fait Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Mario Pezzotti
Mario Pezzotti University of Verona
Emanuel Epstein
Emanuel Epstein University of California, Davis
Paul A. Haynes
Paul A. Haynes Macquarie University
David A. Schooley
David A. Schooley University of Nevada Reno
Rana Munns
Rana Munns University of Western Australia
Massimo Delledonne
Massimo Delledonne University of Verona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Grant R. Cramer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles