World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
62
Citations
12966
World Ranking
1104
National Ranking
34

Michel Génard publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michel Génard sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 262 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Michel Génard D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michel Génard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Horticulture

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Sugar, Horticulture, Sucrose and Food science. The study incorporates disciplines such as Citric acid and Malic acid in addition to Botany. His Sugar research integrates issues from Dry matter and Agronomy.

His Horticulture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Backcross population, Qtl analysis and Irrigation. His studies deal with areas such as Fructose and Flesh as well as Sucrose. He studied Food science and Metabolism that intersect with Malate dehydrogenase, Enzyme assay and Metabolite.

His most cited work include:

  • Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs (434 citations)
  • What controls fleshy fruit acidity? A review of malate and citrate accumulation in fruit cells (229 citations)
  • Fruit thinning and shade improve bean characteristics and beverage quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under optimal conditions (215 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Michel Génard mostly deals with Horticulture, Botany, Agronomy, Sugar and Cultivar. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Dry matter and Horticulture. Michel Génard works on Botany which deals in particular with Prunus.

His Agronomy research includes themes of Mango fruit, Thinning and Transpiration. His Sugar research also works with subjects such as

  • Sucrose together with Fructose and Sorbitol,
  • Flesh that intertwine with fields like Sweetness. His Shoot research incorporates themes from Photosynthesis, Vegetative reproduction, Leafy and Growing season.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Horticulture (41.92%)
  • Botany (35.81%)
  • Agronomy (20.09%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Horticulture (41.92%)
  • Sugar (18.78%)
  • Agronomy (20.09%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Michel Génard mainly focuses on Horticulture, Sugar, Agronomy, Botany and Cultivar. His study looks at the relationship between Horticulture and topics such as Dry matter, which overlap with Respiration. His research in Sugar intersects with topics in Starch, Sucrose, Carbohydrate metabolism, Dry weight and Phloem.

His Agronomy research incorporates elements of Fruit tree, Abiotic component and Transpiration. Michel Génard has researched Botany in several fields, including Organoleptic, Titratable acid, Pulp, Sweetness and Cell expansion. Michel Génard usually deals with Cultivar and limits it to topics linked to Prunus and Genome and Gene.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Epigenetics for Plant Improvement: Current Knowledge and Modeling Avenues (76 citations)
  • Metabolomic profiling in tomato reveals diel compositional changes in fruit affected by source–sink relationships (40 citations)
  • Putting primary metabolism into perspective to obtain better fruits. (39 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Horticulture

His main research concerns Botany, Horticulture, Transpiration, Cultivar and Sugar. Horticulture is closely attributed to Sweetness in his study. The Transpiration study combines topics in areas such as Dry matter and Agronomy.

His study looks at the intersection of Cultivar and topics like Prunus with Shoot, Crop, Apple tree, Malus and Irrigation. In Shoot, Michel Génard works on issues like Photosynthesis, which are connected to Respiration. His studies in Sugar integrate themes in fields like Carbohydrate metabolism, Osmotic pressure, Turgor pressure and Sucrose.

Best Publications

  • Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs

    Bertrand Muller;Florent Pantin;Michel Génard;Olivier Turc

  • What controls fleshy fruit acidity? A review of malate and citrate accumulation in fruit cells

    Audrey Etienne;Michel Génard;Philippe Lobit;Didier Mbéguié-A-Mbéguié

  • Fruit thinning and shade improve bean characteristics and beverage quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under optimal conditions

    Philippe Vaast;Philippe Vaast;Benoit Bertrand;Jean-Jacques Perriot;Bernard Guyot

  • How does tomato quality (sugar, acid, and nutritional quality) vary with ripening stage, temperature, and irradiance?

    Hélène Gautier;Vicky Diakou-Verdin;Camille Bénard;Maryse Reich

  • Effects of Low Nitrogen Supply on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Fruit Yield and Quality with Special Emphasis on Sugars, Acids, Ascorbate, Carotenoids, and Phenolic Compounds

    Camille Bénard;Hélène Gautier;Frédéric Bourgaud;Dominique Grasselly

  • A biophysical model of fruit growth: simulation of seasonal and diurnal dynamics of mass

    S. Fishman;M. Génard

  • QTL ANALYSIS OF QUALITY TRAITS IN AN ADVANCED BACKCROSS BETWEEN PRUNUS PERSICA CULTIVARS AND THE WILD RELATIVE SPECIES P. DAVIDIANA

    B. Quilot;B. H. Wu;J. Kervella;M. Génard

  • Epigenetics for Plant Improvement: Current Knowledge and Modeling Avenues

    Philippe Gallusci;Zhanwu Dai;Michel Génard;Arnaud Gauffretau

  • A biophysical analysis of stem and root diameter variations in woody plants.

    Michel Génard;Svetlana Fishman;Gilles Vercambre;Jean-Gérard Huguet

  • Carbon allocation in fruit trees: from theory to modelling

    Michel Génard;Jean Dauzat;Nicolás Franck;Françoise Lescourret

  • Tomato quality as influenced by preharvest factors

    Nadia Bertin;Michel Génard

  • Model-assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes

    Huai-Feng Liu;Michel Génard;Soraya Guichard;Nadia Bertin

  • Soluble sugars mediate sink feedback down-regulation of leaf photosynthesis in field-grown Coffea arabica

    Nicolás Franck;Philippe Vaast;Michel Génard;Jean Dauzat

  • Multivariate analysis of within-tree factors accounting for the variation of peach fruit quality

    M. Génard;C. Bruchou

  • Remarkable reproducibility of enzyme activity profiles in tomato fruits grown under contrasting environments provides a roadmap for studies of fruit metabolism

    Benoit Biais;Camille Bénard;Bertrand Beauvoit;Sophie Colombié

  • Modelling malic acid accumulation in fruits: relationships with organic acids, potassium, and temperature

    Philippe Lobit;Michel Genard;Patrick Soing;Robert Habib

  • Regulation of tomato fruit ascorbate content is more highly dependent on fruit irradiance than leaf irradiance

    Hélène Gautier;Capucine Massot;Rebecca Stevens;Sylvie Sérino

  • Changes in fruit sugar concentrations in response to assimilate supply, metabolism and dilution: a modeling approach applied to peach fruit (Prunus persica).

    M. Génard;F. Lescourret;L. Gomez;R. Habib

  • Towards a virtual fruit focusing on quality : modelling features and potential uses

    Michel Génard;Nadia Bertin;C. Borel;Philippe Bussières

  • Ecosystem services in orchards. A review

    Constance Demestihas;Daniel Plénet;Michel Génard;Christiane Raynal

  • Leaf:fruit ratio and irrigation supply affect seasonal changes in minerals, organic acids and sugars of mango fruit

    Mathieu Léchaudel;Jacques Joas;Yanis Caro;Michel Génard

  • Genetic and physiological analysis of tomato fruit weight and composition: influence of carbon availability on QTL detection

    Marion Prudent;Mathilde Causse;Michel Génard;Pasquale Tripodi

  • Fruit load and branch ring-barking affect carbon allocation and photosynthesis of leaf and fruit of Coffea arabica in the field.

    Philippe Vaast;Jobert Angrand;Nicolas Franck;Jean Dauzat

  • A simulation model of growth at the shoot-bearing fruit level: I. Description and parameterization for peach

    Françoise Lescourret;M. Ben Mimoun;M. Génard

Frequent Co-Authors

Françoise Lescourret
Françoise Lescourret INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Nadia Bertin
Nadia Bertin INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Hélène Gautier
Hélène Gautier INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Zhanwu Dai
Zhanwu Dai Chinese Academy of Sciences
Christophe Godin
Christophe Godin École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Yves Gibon
Yves Gibon University of Bordeaux
Mathilde Causse
Mathilde Causse INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Loïc Pagès
Loïc Pagès INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Shaohua Li
Shaohua Li Chinese Academy of Sciences
Emilio Nicolás
Emilio Nicolás Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michel Génard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles