World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
43
Citations
6677
World Ranking
3250
National Ranking
114

Nadia Bertin publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Bertin sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 128 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Nadia Bertin D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Bertin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Gene

Nadia Bertin mostly deals with Botany, Monoterpene, Horticulture, Isoprene and Seasonality. Her Botany study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Cell division. Her work focuses on many connections between Monoterpene and other disciplines, such as Fagaceae, that overlap with her field of interest in Water stress and Photosynthesis.

Her Horticulture study incorporates themes from Ploidy, Cell Enlargement, DNA endoreduplication and Transpiration. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Osmotic pressure, Phloem, Xylem and Turgor pressure. Nadia Bertin integrates many fields, such as Seasonality, Diurnal temperature variation and Atmospheric sciences, in her works.

Her most cited work include:

  • Major Proteome Variations Associated with Cherry Tomato Pericarp Development and Ripening (199 citations)
  • Light and temperature dependence of the emission of cyclic and acyclic monoterpenes from holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) leaves (167 citations)
  • Seasonal and diurnal patterns of monoterpene emissions from Pinus pinea (L.) under field conditions (165 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary areas of study are Horticulture, Botany, Agronomy, Biological system and Sugar. Nadia Bertin is involved in the study of Horticulture that focuses on Solanum in particular. Her Botany research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Cell division and Solanaceae.

Her Agronomy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Vapour Pressure Deficit and Competition. The study incorporates disciplines such as Fruit development and Cell expansion in addition to Biological system. Her work deals with themes such as Quantitative trait locus, Genetic variability, Botrytis cinerea and Fructose, which intersect with Sugar.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Horticulture (31.53%)
  • Botany (27.03%)
  • Agronomy (18.92%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Horticulture (31.53%)
  • Fruit development (7.21%)
  • Water deficit (4.50%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Nadia Bertin spends much of her time researching Horticulture, Fruit development, Water deficit, Biotechnology and Water content. Specifically, her work in Horticulture is concerned with the study of Solanum. Her research in Fruit development intersects with topics in Order, Ploidy, Cell division and Cell expansion.

She interconnects Xylem and Pedicel in the investigation of issues within Water deficit. Pedicel is a subfield of Botany that Nadia Bertin tackles. Her Water content research also works with subjects such as

  • Carbohydrate that intertwine with fields like Carbohydrate metabolism, Dehydration and Metabolism,
  • Starch that connect with fields like Carotenoid, Chlorophyll fluorescence, Dry matter and Ripening.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Putting primary metabolism into perspective to obtain better fruits. (39 citations)
  • Tomato quality as influenced by preharvest factors (33 citations)
  • Coupling water fluxes with cell wall mechanics in a multicellular model of plant development. (12 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Gene

Her main research concerns Biotechnology, Context, Biomass, Cell expansion and Leaf expansion. Her Biotechnology research includes elements of Biologist and Preharvest. Her Context study spans across into subjects like Flow measurement, Hagen–Poiseuille equation, Spin echo, Inflow and Biological system.

Her Biomass study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Soil water deficit, Specific leaf area and Horticulture.

Best Publications

  • Major Proteome Variations Associated with Cherry Tomato Pericarp Development and Ripening

    Mireille Faurobert;Christina Mihr;Nadia Bertin;Tomasz Pawlowski

  • Water shortage and quality of fleshy fruits—making the most of the unavoidable

    Julie Ripoll;Laurent Urban;Michael Staudt;Félicie Lopez-Lauri

  • Tomato fruit quality in relation to water and carbon fluxes

    Soraya Guichard;Nadia Bertin;Cherubino Leonardi;Christian Gary

  • Light and temperature dependence of the emission of cyclic and acyclic monoterpenes from holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) leaves

    M. Staudt;N. Bertin

  • High vapour pressure deficit influences growth, transpiration and quality of tomato fruits

    Cherubino Leonardi;Soraya Guichard;Nadia Bertin

  • Analysis of the Tomato Fruit Growth Response to Temperature and Plant Fruit Load in Relation to Cell Division, Cell Expansion and DNA Endoreduplication

    N. Bertin

  • Competition for assimilates and fruit position affect fruit set in indeterminate greenhouse tomato.

    N. Bertin

  • Seasonal variation in amount and composition of monoterpenes emitted by young Pinus pinea trees - implications for emission modeling

    M. Staudt;N. Bertin;B. Frenzel;G. Seufert

  • Seasonal Evolution of the Quality of Fresh Glasshouse Tomatoes under Mediterranean Conditions, as Affected by Air Vapour Pressure Deficit and Plant Fruit Load

    N. Bertin;S. Guichard;C. Leonardi;J. J. Longuenesse

  • Diurnal and seasonal course of monoterpene emissions from Quercus ilex (L.) under natural conditions application of light and temperature algorithms

    N. Bertin;M. Staudt;U. Hansen;G. Seufert

  • Emission of reactive terpene compounds from orange orchards and their removal by within‐canopy processes

    Paolo Ciccioli;Enzo Brancaleoni;Massimiliano Frattoni;Vincenzo Di Palo

  • Tomato quality as influenced by preharvest factors

    Nadia Bertin;Michel Génard

  • Model-assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes

    Huai-Feng Liu;Michel Génard;Soraya Guichard;Nadia Bertin

  • Analysis of Growth and Water Relations of Tomato Fruits in Relation to Air Vapor Pressure Deficit and Plant Fruit Load

    Soraya Guichard;Christian Gary;Cherubino Leonardi;Nadia Bertin

  • Effect of water stress on monoterpene emissions from young potted holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) trees

    N. Bertin;M. Staudt

  • Water deficit effects on tomato quality depend on fruit developmental stage and genotype.

    Julie Ripoll;Julie Ripoll;Laurent Urban;Béatrice Brunel;Nadia Bertin

  • Towards a virtual fruit focusing on quality : modelling features and potential uses

    Michel Génard;Nadia Bertin;C. Borel;Philippe Bussières

  • Genetic and physiological analysis of tomato fruit weight and composition: influence of carbon availability on QTL detection

    Marion Prudent;Mathilde Causse;Michel Génard;Pasquale Tripodi

  • Number of cells in tomato fruit depending on fruit position and source-sink balance during plant development

    Nadia Bertin;Hélène Gautier;Cédric Roche

  • Monoterpene emissions in relation to foliar photosynthetic and structural variables in Mediterranean evergreen Quercus species

    Ülo Niinemets;Karin Hauff;Nadia Bertin;John D. Tenhunen

  • Under what circumstances can process-based simulation models link genotype to phenotype for complex traits? Case-study of fruit and grain quality traits

    Nadia Bertin;Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Michel Génard;Bénédicte Quilot

  • Dry-matter production in a tomato crop: comparison of two simulation models

    N. Bertin;E. Heuvelink

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Génard
Michel Génard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Christophe Godin
Christophe Godin École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Mathilde Causse
Mathilde Causse INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Hélène Gautier
Hélène Gautier INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jean-Luc Verdeil
Jean-Luc Verdeil Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
Pierre Martre
Pierre Martre INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Zhanwu Dai
Zhanwu Dai Chinese Academy of Sciences
Françoise Lescourret
Françoise Lescourret INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Paolo Ciccioli
Paolo Ciccioli National Research Council (CNR)
Laurent Laplaze
Laurent Laplaze University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nadia Bertin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles