World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
69
Citations
14544
World Ranking
1814
National Ranking
122

Jürgen Kesselmeier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Kesselmeier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 232 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jürgen Kesselmeier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Kesselmeier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jürgen Kesselmeier is affiliated with the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Environmental Science, with specific contributions in Atmospheric Science, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scope of their work covers several key topics, including atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, plant responses to elevated CO2, indoor air quality and microbial exposure, lichen and fungal ecology, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, as well as climate change communication and perception.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Kesselmeier include:

  • "Tropical and Boreal Forest - Atmosphere Interactions: A Review" (2022), Tellus B
  • "Amazonian biogenic volatile organic compounds under global change" (2020), Global Change Biology
  • "Aerosol measurement methods to quantify spore emissions from fungi and cryptogamic covers in the Amazon" (2020), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "Bioaerosols in the Amazon rain forest: temporal variations and vertical profiles of Eukarya, Bacteria, and Archaea" (2021), Biogeosciences
  • "Intra- and interannual changes in isoprene emission from central Amazonia" (2023), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Kesselmeier frequently publishes in specialized journals such as Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Biogeosciences, Tellus B, Global Change Biology, and Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. Their publication history indicates a strong presence especially in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics and Biogeosciences.

Collaborations form an integral component of their research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Christopher Pöhlker
  • Meinrat O. Andreae
  • Bettina Weber
  • Alessandro Araújo
  • Stefan Wolff

Best Publications

  • Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC): An Overview on Emission, Physiology and Ecology

    J. Kesselmeier;M. Staudt

  • The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO): overview of pilot measurements on ecosystem ecology, meteorology, trace gases, and aerosols

    M. O. Andreae;M. O. Andreae;O. C. Acevedo;A. Araùjo;P. Artaxo

  • Central Amazonian Floodplain Forests: Tree Adaptations in a Pulsing System

    P. Parolin;O. De Simone;K. Haase;D. Waldhoff

  • Emission of short chained organic acids, aldehydes and monoterpenes from Quercus ilex L. and Pinus pinea L. in relation to physiological activities, carbon budget and emission algorithms

    J. Kesselmeier;K. Bode;U. Hofmann;H. Müller

  • Global budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: Temporal and spatial variations of the dominant sources and sinks

    A. J. Kettle;U. Kuhn;M. von Hobe;J. Kesselmeier

  • Atmospheric volatile organic compounds (VOC) at a remote tropical forest site in central Amazonia

    J. Kesselmeier;U. Kuhn;A. Wolf;M. O. Andreae

  • Consumption of carbonyl sulphide (COS) by higher plant carbonic anhydrase (CA)

    G. Protoschill-Krebs;C. Wilhelm;J. Kesselmeier

  • Isoprene and monoterpene fluxes from Central Amazonian rainforest inferred from tower-based and airborne measurements, and implications on the atmospheric chemistry and the local carbon budget

    U. Kuhn;M.O. Andreae;C. Ammann;A.C. Araújo

  • Estimations of isoprenoid emission capacity from enclosure studies: measurements, data processing, quality and standardized measurement protocols

    Ülo Niinemets;U. Kuhn;P. C. Harley;M. Staudt

  • Volatile organic compound emissions in relation to plant carbon fixation and the terrestrial carbon budget

    Jürgen Kesselmeier;Paolo Ciccioli;Uwe Kuhn;Paolo Stefani

  • Emission of monoterpenes and isoprene from a Mediterranean oak species Quercus ilex L. measured within the BEMA (Biogenic Emissions in the Mediterranean Area) project

    J. Kesselmeier;L. Schäfer;P. Ciccioli;E. Brancaleoni

  • Patterns of CO2 exchange in biological soil crusts of successional age

    Eli Zaady;Uwe Kuhn;Burkhard Wilske;Lisseth Sandoval-Soto

  • Exchange of Short-Chain Oxygenated Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) between Plants and the Atmosphere: A Compilation of Field and Laboratory Studies

    J. Kesselmeier

  • Controlling variables for the uptake of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide by soil

    J. Kesselmeier;N. Teusch;U. Kuhn

  • Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles

    Mary E. Whelan;Mary E. Whelan;Sinikka T. Lennartz;Teresa E. Gimeno;Richard Wehr

  • Emissions of volatile organic compounds from Quercus ilex L. measured by Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry under different environmental conditions

    R. Holzinger;L. Sandoval-Soto;S. Rottenberger;P. J. Crutzen

  • The leaf-level emission factor of volatile isoprenoids: caveats, model algorithms, response shapes and scaling

    Ü. Niinemets;R. K. Monson;Almut Arneth;P. Ciccioli

  • Seasonal differences in isoprene and light-dependent monoterpene emission by Amazonian tree species

    U. Kuhn;S. Rottenberger;T. Biesenthal;A. Wolf

  • ACRIDICON–CHUVA Campaign: Studying Tropical Deep Convective Clouds and Precipitation over Amazonia Using the New German Research Aircraft HALO

    Manfred Wendisch;Ulrich Pöschl;Meinrat O. Andreae;Luiz A. T. Machado

  • Long-term observations of cloud condensation nuclei in the Amazon rain forest – Part 1: Aerosol size distribution, hygroscopicity, and new model parametrizations for CCN prediction

    Mira L. Pöhlker;Christopher Pöhlker;Florian Ditas;Thomas Klimach

  • Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO 2 )

    L. Sandoval-Soto;M. Stanimirov;M. von Hobe;Vivien Schmitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Meinrat O. Andreae
Meinrat O. Andreae Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Jonathan Williams
Jonathan Williams Max Planck Society
Paolo Ciccioli
Paolo Ciccioli National Research Council (CNR)
Paulo Artaxo
Paulo Artaxo Universidade de São Paulo
Franz X. Meixner
Franz X. Meixner Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Ulrich Pöschl
Ulrich Pöschl Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Enzo Brancaleoni
Enzo Brancaleoni National Research Council (CNR)
Jos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Antonio O. Manzi
Antonio O. Manzi National Institute for Space Research
Joel Brito
Joel Brito IMT Lille Douai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in advanced research or clinical practice, exploring fully funded dsw programs can provide a strong foundation in social work aspects related to environmental justice and community health.

If you’re looking for flexible, affordable options to complement your Environmental Science studies, consider the cheapest online general studies degree programs. These can serve as a gateway to diverse skill sets applicable in environmental policy and administration.

For prospective students wondering about workload, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help set realistic expectations and guide your degree choice toward manageable yet impactful programs.

Additionally, pursuing a specialized path through a geology online degree complements environmental studies by deepening knowledge of earth systems, crucial for careers in conservation, natural resource management, and environmental consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen Kesselmeier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles