World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthias Gaestel

Matthias Gaestel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 92 691 614 58 54 321 47220

Matthias Gaestel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthias Gaestel between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthias Gaestel published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2023. 9 of the 397 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2023. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications
1981 2025

397 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthias Gaestel: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 5
1990 0
1991 3
1992 3
1993 6
1994 5
1995 7
1996 4
1997 7
1998 9
1999 11
2000 4
2001 5
2002 12
2003 3
2004 10
2005 4
2006 16
2007 20
2008 14
2009 16
2010 16
2011 10
2012 9
2013 12
2014 13
2015 20
2016 26
2017 10
2018 7
2019 18
2020 10
2021 15
2022 11
2023 39
2024 3
2025 6
Total 397
Download as CSV

Matthias Gaestel publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Gaestel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 317–326 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 321 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41 321
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthias Gaestel D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Gaestel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51 92
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthias Gaestel is affiliated with Hannover Medical School in Germany and has contributed extensively to research primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. Their scholarly work spans various subfields, including Molecular Biology, Immunology, Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Oncology.

Their published research covers key topics such as:

  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
  • NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Signaling Pathways in Disease

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Cellular Physiology
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Gaestel has collaborated often with several researchers, notably:

  • Alexey Kotlyarov
  • Manoj B. Menon
  • Natalia Ronkina
  • Sherin A. Nawaito
  • Pramod Sahadevan

Recent publications demonstrate a focus on MAPK pathways and cellular signaling mechanisms. These include:

  • "MAPK-Activated Protein Kinases: Servant or Partner?" (2022, Annual Review of Biochemistry)
  • "p38 MAPK signalling regulates cytokine production in IL-33 stimulated Type 2 Innate Lymphoid cells" (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • "Cdc42-Borg4-Septin7 axis regulates HSC polarity and function" (2021, EMBO Reports)
  • "Phosphorylation of steroid receptor coactivator-3 (SRC-3) at serine 857 is regulated by the p38MAPK-MK2 axis and affects NF-κB-mediated transcription" (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • "Inhibition of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK)-Activated Protein Kinase 2 (MK2) is Protective in Pulmonary Hypertension" (2021, Hypertension)

The emphasis across these papers reflects work on intracellular signaling pathways involved in immune responses, transcription regulation, and disease mechanisms such as pulmonary hypertension and hematopoietic stem cell function.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Small heat shock proteins are molecular chaperones

    U Jakob;M Gaestel;K Engel;J Buchner

  • Binding of non-native protein to Hsp25 during heat shock creates a reservoir of folding intermediates for reactivation

    Monika Ehrnsperger;Simone Gräber;Matthias Gaestel;Johannes Buchner

  • Regulation of Hsp27 Oligomerization, Chaperone Function, and Protective Activity against Oxidative Stress/Tumor Necrosis Factor α by Phosphorylation

    Thorsten Rogalla;Monika Ehrnsperger;Xavier Preville;Alexey Kotlyarov

  • MAPKAP kinase 2 is essential for LPS-induced TNF-alpha biosynthesis.

    Alexey Kotlyarov;Armin Neininger;Carola Schubert;Rolf Eckert

  • The p38 MAP kinase pathway signals for cytokine-induced mRNA stabilization via MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2 and an AU-rich region-targeted mechanism

    Reinhard Winzen;Michael Kracht;Birgit Ritter;Arno Wilhelm

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • TNF and increased intracellular iron alter macrophage polarization to a detrimental M1 phenotype in the injured spinal cord.

    Antje Kroner;Andrew D. Greenhalgh;Juan G. Zarruk;Rosmarini Passos dos Santos

  • Identification of MAPKAP kinase 2 as a major enzyme responsible for the phosphorylation of the small mammalian heat shock proteins

    David Stokoe;Katrin Engel;David G. Campbell;Philip Cohen

  • MAPKAP kinases — MKs — two's company, three's a crowd

    Matthias Gaestel

  • Mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 regulates tumor necrosis factor mRNA stability and translation mainly by altering tristetraprolin expression, stability, and binding to adenine/uridine-rich element.

    Edward Hitti;Tatiana Iakovleva;Matthew Brook;Stefanie Deppenmeier

  • MK2 targets AU-rich elements and regulates biosynthesis of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 independently at different post-transcriptional levels.

    Armin Neininger;Dimitris Kontoyiannis;Alexey Kotlyarov;Reinhard Winzen

  • Targeting innate immunity protein kinase signalling in inflammation.

    Matthias Gaestel;Alexey Kotlyarov;Michael Kracht

  • Leptomycin B‐sensitive nuclear export of MAPKAP kinase 2 is regulated by phosphorylation

    Katrin Engel;Alexey Kotlyarov;Matthias Gaestel

  • Stress-induced phosphorylation of STAT1 at Ser727 requires p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase whereas IFN-gamma uses a different signaling pathway.

    Pavel Kovarik;Dagmar Stoiber;Patrick A. Eyers;Rossella Menghini

  • Distinct Cellular Functions of MK2

    Alexey Kotlyarov;Yvonne Yannoni;Susann Fritz;Kathrin Laass

  • Genetic dissection of the cellular pathways and signaling mechanisms in modeled tumor necrosis factor-induced Crohn's-like inflammatory bowel disease.

    Dimitris Kontoyiannis;George Boulougouris;Menelaos Manoloukos;Maria Armaka

  • Interleukin-10 targets p38 MAPK to modulate ARE-dependent TNF mRNA translation and limit intestinal pathology

    Dimitris Kontoyiannis;Alexey Kotlyarov;Ester Carballo;Lena Alexopoulou

  • CREB is activated by UVC through a p38/HOG‐1‐dependent protein kinase

    M. Iordanov;K. Bender;T. Ade;W. Schmid

Frequent Co-Authors

Dieter Häussinger
Dieter Häussinger Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Bruce G. Allen
Bruce G. Allen Montreal Heart Institute
Jean-Claude Tardif
Jean-Claude Tardif Montreal Heart Institute
Johannes Buchner
Johannes Buchner Technical University of Munich
Roger J. Davis
Roger J. Davis University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Leonidas C. Platanias
Leonidas C. Platanias Northwestern University
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Danuta Radzioch
Danuta Radzioch McGill University
Lars Iversen
Lars Iversen Aarhus University Hospital
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology can open doors to a wide range of healthcare careers, many of which demand advanced education and specialized training. Fortunately, there are flexible, online options for progressing in related fields—ideal if you’re balancing work or life commitments.

For registered nurses looking to advance, fast-track programs like rn to bsn 6 months let you earn higher credentials in as little as half a year. Another pathway is the increasingly popular rn to np programs, which bridge the gap from associate degrees to nurse practitioner roles through online courses.

If you’re coming from a non-nursing background but wish to pivot into healthcare, direct entry msn online programs allow you to quickly qualify as a master’s-prepared nurse. Choosing the right online school is vital—compare institutions like WGU, Chamberlain, and Capella with resources evaluating wgu vs chamberlain to see which fits your goals.

Whether you are interested in research, clinical care, or advanced practice, these related online pathways can help you expand your career options after studying molecular biology in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Gaestel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles