World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 50 2159 1990 66 65 182 8537

Annick Moing publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annick Moing between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annick Moing published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2015. 6 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2015. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 8 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annick Moing: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 0
1992 4
1993 2
1994 5
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 7
1999 2
2000 4
2001 1
2002 8
2003 2
2004 4
2005 3
2006 10
2007 4
2008 4
2009 8
2010 9
2011 12
2012 6
2013 8
2014 3
2015 17
2016 8
2017 7
2018 16
2019 8
2020 13
2021 11
2022 4
2023 7
2024 4
2025 2
Total 212
Download as CSV

Annick Moing publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annick Moing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–185 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 182 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98 182
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Annick Moing D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annick Moing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122 50
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Annick Moing is affiliated with INRAE (Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement) in France. Their research spans across several disciplines within the agricultural and biological sciences, with a significant focus on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Subfields of interest concentrate primarily on:

  • Plant Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Aquatic Science
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Physiology

Their research covers a variety of topics, notably:

  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
  • Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance

Annick Moing has published extensively, with recent papers including:

  • "Hyperpolarized NMR Metabolomics at Natural 13C Abundance," 2020, Analytical Chemistry
  • "Maize metabolome and proteome responses to controlled cold stress partly mimic early-sowing effects in the field and differ from those of Arabidopsis," 2021, Plant Cell & Environment
  • "Comparative Metabolomics and Molecular Phylogenetics of Melon (Cucumis melo, Cucurbitaceae) Biodiversity," 2020, Metabolites
  • "Biomass composition explains fruit relative growth rate and discriminates climacteric from non-climacteric species," 2020, Journal of Experimental Botany
  • "Integrative Metabolomics for Assessing the Effect of Insect (Hermetia illucens) Protein Extract on Rainbow Trout Metabolism," 2020, Metabolites

Frequent co-authors collaborating with them include:

  • Catherine Deborde
  • Daniel Jacob
  • Yves Gibon
  • Mickaël Maucourt
  • Stéphane Bernillon

Their work appears regularly in several publication venues, such as:

  • Metabolites
  • Metabolomics
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Journal of Experimental Botany
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Best Publications

  • Mapping QTLs controlling fruit quality in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)

    Elisabeth Dirlewanger;Annick Moing;Christophe Rothan;Laurence Svanella

  • Candidate genes and QTLs for sugar and organic acid content in peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch].

    C. Etienne;C. Rothan;A. Moing;C. Plomion

  • Non-structural carbohydrates in woody plants compared among laboratories.

    Audrey G. Quentin;Audrey G. Quentin;Elizabeth A. Pinkard;Michael G. Ryan;Michael G. Ryan;David T. Tissue

  • Microclimate influence on mineral and metabolic profiles of grape berries.

    Unknown

  • Gene and metabolite regulatory network analysis of early developing fruit tissues highlights new candidate genes for the control of tomato fruit composition and development.

    Fabien Mounet;Annick Moing;Virginie Garcia;Johann Petit

  • Grape berry development: a review

    N. Ollat;P. Diakou-Verdin;J.P. Carde;F. Barrieu

  • NMRProcFlow: A graphical and interactive tool dedicated to 1D spectra processing for NMR-based metabolomics

    Daniel Jacob;Catherine Deborde;Marie Lefebvre;Mickael Maucourt

  • Isolation and characterization of six peach cDNAs encoding key proteins in organic acid metabolism and solute accumulation: involvement in regulating peach fruit acidity

    Christelle Etienne;Annick Moing;Elisabeth Dirlewanger;Philippe Raymond

  • 1H NMR metabolite fingerprints of grape berry: Comparison of vintage and soil effects in Bordeaux grapevine growing areas

    Giuliano E. Pereira;Jean-Pierre Gaudillere;Cornelius van Leeuwen;Ghislaine Hilbert

  • COordination of Standards in MetabOlomicS (COSMOS): facilitating integrated metabolomics data access

    Reza M. Salek;Reza M. Salek;Steffen Neumann;Daniel Schober;Jan Hummel

  • Carbon fluxes in mature peach leaves.

    Annick Moing;Francis Carbonne;Mohamed H. Rashad;Jean-Pierre Gaudillère

  • Development of a second-generation genetic linkage map for peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and characterization of morphological traits affecting flower and fruit

    E. Dirlewanger;P. Cosson;K. Boudehri;C. Renaud

  • Biochemical Changes during Fruit Development of Four Strawberry Cultivars

    Annick Moing;Christel Renaud;Monique Gaudillère;Philippe Raymond

  • Metabolomics and fish nutrition: a review in the context of sustainable feed development

    Simon Roques;Catherine Deborde;Nadège Richard;Sandrine Skiba‐Cassy

  • 1H NMR, GC−EI-TOFMS, and Data Set Correlation for Fruit Metabolomics: Application to Spatial Metabolite Analysis in Melon

    Benoit Biais;J. William Allwood;Catherine Deborde;Yun Xu

  • Identification of the carotenoid modifying gene PALE YELLOW PETAL 1 as an essential factor in xanthophyll esterification and yellow flower pigmentation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

    Tohru Ariizumi;Sanae Kishimoto;Ryo Kakami;Takashi Maoka

  • Quantitative metabolic profiling by 1-dimensional 1H-NMR analyses: application to plant genetics and functional genomics.

    Annick Moing;Mickaël Maucourt;Christel Renaud;Monique Gaudillère

  • 1H NMR and chemometrics to characterize mature grape berries in four wine-growing areas in Bordeaux, France.

    Unknown

  • Effects of long-term cadmium exposure on growth and metabolomic profile of tomato plants.

    Hédia Hédiji;Wahbi Djebali;Cécile Cabasson;Cécile Cabasson;Michael Maucourt;Michael Maucourt

  • Compositional Changes during the Fruit Development of Two Peach Cultivars Differing in Juice Acidity

    Annick Moing;Laurence Svanella;Dominique Rolin;Monique Gaudillère

  • Extensive metabolic cross-talk in melon fruit revealed by spatial and developmental combinatorial metabolomics

    Annick Moing;Asaph Aharoni;Benoit Biais;Ilana Rogachev

  • Quantitative metabolic profiles of tomato flesh and seeds during fruit development: complementary analysis with ANN and PCA

    Fabien Mounet;Martine Lemaire-Chamley;Mickaël Maucourt;Cécile Cabasson

  • Metabolite modifications in Solanum lycopersicum roots and leaves under cadmium stress

    Latifa Boulila Zoghlami;Wahbi Djebali;Zouhaier Abbes;Hedia Hediji

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Jacob
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Yves Gibon
Yves Gibon University of Bordeaux
Christophe Rothan
Christophe Rothan University of Bordeaux
Elisabeth Dirlewanger
Elisabeth Dirlewanger INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Royston Goodacre
Royston Goodacre University of Liverpool
Robert Hall
Robert Hall Royal Holloway University of London
Renaud Brouquisse
Renaud Brouquisse Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Joachim Kopka
Joachim Kopka Max Planck Society
Zhanwu Dai
Zhanwu Dai Chinese Academy of Sciences
Peter M. Rogowsky
Peter M. Rogowsky École Normale Supérieure de Lyon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Annick Moing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles