World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 60 3082 2821 228 210 131 16235

Bruno Kyewski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bruno Kyewski between 1978 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bruno Kyewski published across 46 years, from 1978 to 2023, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2023. 12 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2023. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 12 publications
1978 2023

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bruno Kyewski: publications per year, 1978 to 2023
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 3
1983 0
1984 3
1985 2
1986 3
1987 3
1988 3
1989 4
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 3
1994 3
1995 4
1996 2
1997 6
1998 2
1999 0
2000 4
2001 2
2002 2
2003 2
2004 5
2005 5
2006 7
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 7
2011 6
2012 3
2013 3
2014 4
2015 8
2016 7
2017 4
2018 5
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 12
Total 146
Download as CSV

Bruno Kyewski publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Kyewski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 125–134 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 131 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234 131
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Bruno Kyewski D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Kyewski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139 60
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Bruno Kyewski is affiliated with the German Cancer Research Center in Germany. Their professional activity is situated within this leading institution known for cancer research.

There is no available data on recent papers authored by Bruno Kyewski, nor information on frequent co-authors or specific publication venues associated with their work.

The scientist's main fields and subfields of study, as well as the main topics of work, are not documented in the current data set. Similarly, no book publications or awards have been recorded.

Bruno Kyewski is currently living, and their detailed research contributions and specific academic interests remain unspecified in the provided information.

Best Publications

  • Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see).

    Ludger Klein;Bruno Kyewski;Paul M. Allen;Kristin A. Hogquist

  • Promiscuous gene expression in medullary thymic epithelial cells mirrors the peripheral self.

    Jens Derbinski;Antje Schulte;Bruno Kyewski;Ludger Klein;Ludger Klein

  • A CENTRAL ROLE FOR CENTRAL TOLERANCE

    Bruno Kyewski;Ludger Klein

  • Antigen presentation in the thymus for positive selection and central tolerance induction

    Ludger Klein;Maria Hinterberger;Gerald Wirnsberger;Bruno Kyewski

  • Promiscuous gene expression in thymic epithelial cells is regulated at multiple levels.

    Jens Derbinski;Jana Gäbler;Benedikt Brors;Sascha Tierling

  • Two genetically separable steps in the differentiation of thymic epithelium.

    Michael Nehls;Bruno Kyewski;Martin Messerle;Ralph Waldschütz

  • Shaping of the autoreactive T-cell repertoire by a splice variant of self protein expressed in thymic epithelial cells.

    Ludger Klein;Ludger Klein;Matthias Klugmann;Klaus Armin Nave;Vincent K. Tuohy

  • Medullary Epithelial Cells of the Human Thymus Express a Highly Diverse Selection of Tissue-specific Genes Colocalized in Chromosomal Clusters

    Jörn Gotter;Benedikt Brors;Manfred Hergenhahn;Bruno Kyewski

  • Self-representation in the thymus: an extended view.

    Bruno Kyewski;Jens Derbinski

  • Bone marrow as a priming site for T-cell responses to blood-borne antigen

    Markus Feuerer;Philipp Beckhove;Natalio Garbi;Yolanda Mahnke

  • The thymic medulla: a unique microenvironment for intercellular self-antigen transfer.

    Christian Koble;Bruno Kyewski

  • Thymic B Cells Are Licensed to Present Self Antigens for Central T Cell Tolerance Induction.

    Tomoyoshi Yamano;Jelena Nedjic;Maria Hinterberger;Madlen Steinert

  • Thymic tuft cells promote an IL-4-enriched medulla and shape thymocyte development

    Corey N. Miller;Irina Proekt;Jakob von Moltke;Kristen L. Wells

  • Promiscuous gene expression and central T-cell tolerance: more than meets the eye

    Bruno Kyewski;Jens Derbinski;Jörn Gotter;Ludger Klein

  • Islet-reactive CD8+ T cell frequencies in the pancreas, but not in blood, distinguish type 1 diabetic patients from healthy donors

    Slobodan Culina;Slobodan Culina;Slobodan Culina;Ana Ines Lalanne;Ana Ines Lalanne;Ana Ines Lalanne;Georgia Afonso;Georgia Afonso;Georgia Afonso;Karen Cerosaletti

  • Promiscuous gene expression patterns in single medullary thymic epithelial cells argue for a stochastic mechanism.

    Jens Derbinski;Sheena Pinto;Stefanie Rösch;Klaus Hexel

  • Impaired thymic tolerance to α-myosin directs autoimmunity to the heart in mice and humans

    HuiJuan Lv;Evis Havari;Sheena Pinto;Raju V S R K Gottumukkala

  • An IRF8-binding promoter variant and AIRE control CHRNA1 promiscuous expression in thymus

    Matthieu Giraud;Richard Taubert;Claire Vandiedonck;Xiayi Ke

  • CD4 T cell tolerance to human C-reactive protein, an inducible serum protein, is mediated by medullary thymic epithelium.

    Ludger Klein;Thomas Klein;Ulrich Rüther;Bruno Kyewski

  • Conventional and Neo-antigenic Peptides Presented by β Cells Are Targeted by Circulating Naïve CD8+ T Cells in Type 1 Diabetic and Healthy Donors

    Sergio Gonzalez-Duque;Marie Eliane Azoury;Maikel Luis Colli;Georgia Afonso;Georgia Afonso;Georgia Afonso

  • A filarial cysteine protease inhibitor down‐regulates T cell proliferation and enhances interleukin‐10 production

    Susanne Hartmann;Bruno Kyewski;Bettina Sonnenburg;Richard Lucius

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludger Klein
Ludger Klein Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Benedikt Brors
Benedikt Brors German Cancer Research Center
Volker Schirrmacher
Volker Schirrmacher German Cancer Research Center
Raphael Scharfmann
Raphael Scharfmann Université Paris Cité
Henry S. Kaplan
Henry S. Kaplan Stanford University
Ricardo Pujol-Borrell
Ricardo Pujol-Borrell Autonomous University of Barcelona
Lars M. Steinmetz
Lars M. Steinmetz Stanford University
Sébastien Lacroix-Desmazes
Sébastien Lacroix-Desmazes Sorbonne University
Søren Buus
Søren Buus University of Copenhagen
Pärt Peterson
Pärt Peterson University of Tartu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in microbiology, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career paths within the healthcare and biotechnology sectors. One promising direction is becoming a Functional Medicine Nurse Practitioner, and there are specialized functional medicine np programs designed to prepare students for this growing field. These programs emphasize a holistic approach to patient care, integrating microbiological knowledge with clinical practice.

Alternatively, careers in healthcare administration and information management are increasingly vital. A Certified Professional Coder plays a crucial role in medical billing and coding, ensuring accurate documentation and efficient claims processing. Discover more about this opportunity through resources on becoming a certified professional coder.

Graduates can also consider a Health Information Management degree, which combines healthcare, data management, and technology. Professionals in this field benefit from competitive compensation, as detailed in the health information management degree salary overview. Pursuing this path online is made more accessible with cahiim accredited him degree online programs, ensuring quality education that meets industry standards.

Overall, microbiology students have many complementary options that integrate science, healthcare, and technology, paving the way for rewarding and stable careers.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Kyewski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles