World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
18957
World Ranking
3361
National Ranking
1627

Nasser M. Nasrabadi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nasser M. Nasrabadi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 528 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nasser M. Nasrabadi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nasser M. Nasrabadi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - SPIE Fellow

Overview

Nasser M. Nasrabadi is affiliated with West Virginia University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields, with a focus on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, and Signal Processing.

The main research topics covered in their work include:

  • Face recognition and analysis
  • Biometric Identification and Security
  • Face and Expression Recognition
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Nasrabadi's publications frequently appear in a range of venues, with notable contributions in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Access
  • IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science
  • IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
  • IET Biometrics

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Unsupervised Pixel-Wise Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via Autoencoding Adversarial Networks," 2021, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
  • "Joint-SRVDNet: Joint Super Resolution and Vehicle Detection Network," 2020, IEEE Access
  • "Deep GAN-Based Cross-Spectral Cross-Resolution Iris Recognition," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science
  • "Attribute-Based Deep Periocular Recognition: Leveraging Soft Biometrics to Improve Periocular Recognition," 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
  • "A data-driven surrogate to image-based flow simulations in porous media," 2020, Computers & Fluids

Nasrabadi has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Ali Dabouei
  • Jeremy Dawson
  • Sobhan Soleymani
  • Fariborz Taherkhani
  • Mohammad Saeed Ebrahimi Saadabadi

The scientist received the SPIE Fellow award in 1997, acknowledging their contributions to the field. Their work predominantly contributes to advancing biometric identification technologies, computer vision methodologies, and the development of generative adversarial network applications within these domains.

Best Publications

  • Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges

    J. M. Bioucas-Dias;A. Plaza;G. Camps-Valls;P. Scheunders

  • Image coding using vector quantization: a review

    N.M. Nasrabadi;R.A. King

  • Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Dictionary-Based Sparse Representation

    Yi Chen;Nasser M. Nasrabadi;Trac D. Tran

  • Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery

    Heesung Kwon;N.M. Nasrabadi

  • Hyperspectral Image Classification via Kernel Sparse Representation

    Yi Chen;N. M. Nasrabadi;T. D. Tran

  • Hyperspectral Target Detection : An Overview of Current and Future Challenges

    Nasser M. Nasrabadi

  • Sparse Representation for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery

    Yi Chen;N M Nasrabadi;T D Tran

  • Joint Sparse Representation for Robust Multimodal Biometrics Recognition

    Sumit Shekhar;Vishal M. Patel;Nasser M. Nasrabadi;Rama Chellappa

  • Multi-View Automatic Target Recognition using Joint Sparse Representation

    Haichao Zhang;N. M. Nasrabadi;Y. Zhang;T. S. Huang

  • Automated Hyperspectral Cueing for Civilian Search and Rescue

    M.T. Eismann;A.D. Stocker;N.M. Nasrabadi

  • Hopfield network for stereo vision correspondence

    N.M. Nasrabadi;C.Y. Choo

  • Adaptive anomaly detection using subspace separation for hyperspectral imagery

    Heesung Kwon;Sandor Z. Der;Nasser M. Nasrabadi

  • Object recognition using multilayer Hopfield neural network

    S.S. Young;P.D. Scott;N.M. Nasrabadi

  • Close the loop: Joint blind image restoration and recognition with sparse representation prior

    Haichao Zhang;Jianchao Yang;Yanning Zhang;Nasser M. Nasrabadi

  • Object recognition by a Hopfield neural network

    N.M. Nasrabadi;W. Li

  • Design of Non-Linear Kernel Dictionaries for Object Recognition

    Hien Van Nguyen;Vishal M. Patel;Nasser M. Nasrabadi;Rama Chellappa

  • Image compression using address-vector quantization

    N.M. Nasrabadi;Y. Feng

  • Kernel matched subspace detectors for hyperspectral target detection

    Heesung Kwon;N.M. Nasrabadi

  • Simultaneous Joint Sparsity Model for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery

    Yi Chen;N. M. Nasrabadi;T. D. Tran

  • Multimodal Task-Driven Dictionary Learning for Image Classification

    Soheil Bahrampour;Nasser M. Nasrabadi;Asok Ray;William Kenneth Jenkins

  • Vector quantization of images based upon the kohonen self-organization feature maps

    Nasser M. Nasrabadi;Yushu Feng

  • Automated Hyperspectral Cueing for Civilian Search and Rescue A visible and near-infrared imaging system with detection algorithms is being used in civilian search and rescue missions with encouraging results.

    Michael T. Eismann;Alan D. Stocker;Nasser M. Nasrabadi

Frequent Co-Authors

Trac D. Tran
Trac D. Tran Johns Hopkins University
Thomas S. Huang
Thomas S. Huang University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Aggelos K. Katsaggelos
Aggelos K. Katsaggelos Northwestern University
Matthew C. Valenti
Matthew C. Valenti West Virginia University
Rama Chellappa
Rama Chellappa Johns Hopkins University
Vishal M. Patel
Vishal M. Patel Johns Hopkins University
Yanning Zhang
Yanning Zhang Northwestern Polytechnical University
Asok Ray
Asok Ray Pennsylvania State University
Zhaowen Wang
Zhaowen Wang Adobe Systems (United States)
Vishal Monga
Vishal Monga Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Computer Science but have unique academic needs or career interests, there are several related online pathways worth exploring. For students concerned about GPA requirements, there are online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, providing more flexible admissions criteria to help you start or advance your tech career.

Those looking for faster routes to a credential may consider pursuing an online computer science degree through accelerated programs. These options help students complete their studies more quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

Expanding beyond computing, if you are interested in the intersection of technology and environmental impact, you might explore what career options exist in related fields. Resources like what can you do with an environmental science major outline diverse roles in sustainability, conservation, and environmental technology.

Additionally, if affordability is a key concern, consider the environmental engineering online degree programs, which offer a more budget-friendly path into an engineering discipline focused on solving real-world environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Nasser M. Nasrabadi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles