World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
80
Citations
27626
World Ranking
277
National Ranking
203

John B. Loomis publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Loomis sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 380 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

John B. Loomis D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Loomis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

John B. Loomis is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research spans several fields and subfields, with a primary focus on economics and environmental science. The scholar's work predominantly falls under Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Environmental Science, encompassing subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, and Ocean Engineering.

The main research topics explored by John B. Loomis include Economic and Environmental Valuation, Housing Market and Economics, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Forest Management and Policy, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, and Spatial and Panel Data Analysis.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with this researcher include Julie M. Mueller, Leslie Richardson, Ryan A. Fitch, Michelle Haefele, and John C. Whitehead.

Publications by John B. Loomis appear regularly in established academic venues. These include:

  • Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy (2 publications)
  • Ecological Economics (1 publication)
  • Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism (1 publication)
  • Resources Environment and Sustainability (1 publication)
  • ISAHP proceedings (1 publication)

Significant recently published papers authored or coauthored by Loomis are:

  • "Estimating the benefits to Florida households from avoiding another Gulf oil spill using the contingent valuation method: Internal validity tests with probability-based and opt-in samples," 2023, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
  • "Ecosystem service values provided by National Parks to residential property owners," 2024, Ecological Economics
  • "Economics of the Conservation Reserve Program and the wildlife it supports: A case study of upland birds in South Dakota," 2021, Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
  • "Valuing impacts of proximity to Saguaro National Park on house prices," 2021, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
  • "ANALYZING EIA IN PARANÁ, BRAZIL AND CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES WITH FUZZY-SET QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS," 2022, ISAHP proceedings

Best Publications

  • Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation

    Michael Hanemann;John Loomis;Barbara Kanninen

  • Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation

    John Loomis

  • Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey

    John Loomis;Paula Kent;Liz Strange;Kurt Fausch

  • Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis

    John B. Loomis;Douglas S. White

  • Valuing option, existence, and bequest demands for wilderness.

    R. G. Walsh;J. B. Loomis;R. A. Gillman

  • Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions

    Gregory L. Poe;Kelly L. Giraud;John B. Loomis

  • Theoretical and Empirical Advantages of Truncated Count Data Estimators for Analysis of Deer Hunting in California

    Michael D. Creel;John B. Loomis

  • The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity

    Unai Pascual;Roldan Muradian;Luke Brander;Erik Gómez-Baggethun

  • Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies.

    T. Park;J. B. Loomis;M. Creel

  • WHAT'S TO KNOW ABOUT HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION STUDIES?

    John Loomis

  • The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis

    Leslie Richardson;John Loomis

  • The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer

    John B. Loomis

  • The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California

    Jennifer Pate;John Loomis

  • Defining, valuing and providing ecosystem goods and services

    Thomas C. Brown;John C. Bergstrom;John B. Loomis

  • The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation

    Leslie A. Richardson;John Loomis;Timm Kroeger;Frank Casey

  • Comparative reliability of the dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent valuation techniques

    John B Loomis

  • Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: a technical document supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 revision).

    Randall S. Rosenberger;John B. Loomis

  • Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: In-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database

    Randall S. Rosenberger;John B. Loomis

  • Improving Validity Experiments of Contingent Valuation Methods: Results of Efforts to Reduce the Disparity of Hypothetical and Actual Willingness to Pay

    John Loomis;Thomas Brown;Beatrice Lucero;George Peterson

  • Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owl

    John Loomis;Earl Ekstrand

  • Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection

    John Loomis;Michael Lockwood;Terry DeLacy

  • Do Reminders of substitutes and budget constraints influence contingent valuation estimates

    J. Loomis;A. Gonzalez-Caban;R. Gregory

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Bagstad
Kenneth J. Bagstad United States Geological Survey
Wayne E. Thogmartin
Wayne E. Thogmartin United States Geological Survey
Thomas P. Holmes
Thomas P. Holmes United States Department of Agriculture
Maria L. Loureiro
Maria L. Loureiro University of Santiago de Compostela
John C. Bergstrom
John C. Bergstrom University of Georgia
Thomas C. Brown
Thomas C. Brown US Forest Service
W. Michael Hanemann
W. Michael Hanemann Arizona State University
Gregory L. Poe
Gregory L. Poe Cornell University
Rodrigo A. Medellín
Rodrigo A. Medellín National Autonomous University of Mexico
Michael Lockwood
Michael Lockwood University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can be a strategic next step for those interested in Economics and Finance careers. Programs like the online mba entrepreneurship offer flexibility while giving students vital business and leadership skills relevant to starting their own ventures or steering innovative projects.

Another versatile option is a project management degree worth it. These degrees equip students to handle complex business projects, a valuable asset not only in finance and consulting but across many industries.

For those with an eye on the financial field, several top online finance degrees allow for an accelerated path to graduation, letting learners quickly gain specialized knowledge in investments, markets, and financial analysis.

Additionally, if you're looking to further your business education quickly, the shortest mba program options can expedite your career advancement with condensed curriculums and focused learning.

These online pathways can enhance your skills and open doors to a range of career possibilities in Economics, Finance, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing John B. Loomis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles