World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter C. Boxall

Peter C. Boxall

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
11739
World Ranking
4609
National Ranking
273

Peter C. Boxall publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Boxall sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 179 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Peter C. Boxall D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Boxall sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter C. Boxall is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with particular attention to Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, General Decision Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, and Literature and Literary Theory as subfields. The main topics in their work include Economic and Environmental Valuation, Environmental Conservation and Management, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Digital Media and Philosophy, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Indigenous Studies and Ecology, and Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies.

Recent publications by Peter C. Boxall cover a range of subjects and venues, including:

  • Key information needs to move from knowledge to action for biodiversity conservation in Canada, 2021, Biological Conservation
  • The transformation to data analytics in Big-Four financial audit: what, why and how?, 2022, Pacific Accounting Review
  • Effects of the number of alternatives in public good discrete choice experiments, 2020, Ecological Economics
  • Using inferred valuation to quantify survey and social desirability bias in stated preference research, 2021, American Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • Advancing ecosystem services auctions: Insights from an international Delphi panel, 2024, Ecosystem Services

Their work has been published in a variety of journals, with multiple publications in Textual Practice and individual publications in Biological Conservation, Pacific Accounting Review, Ecological Economics, and the American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

Peter C. Boxall has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Patrick Lloyd-Smith
  • Logan Robert Bingham
  • Riccardo Da Re
  • Stuart M. Whitten
  • Thomas Knoke

In addition to journal articles, they have contributed to book publications, including a forthcoming work titled Beckett and Leopardi, scheduled for release in 2025 by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation

    Wiktor Adamowicz;Wiktor Adamowicz;Peter C. Boxall;Michael Williams;Jordan J. Louviere

  • Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach.

    Peter C. Boxall;Wiktor L. Adamowicz

  • A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation

    Peter C. Boxall;Wiktor L. Adamowicz;Joffre Swait;Michael Williams

  • Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation

    Wiktor Adamowicz;Joffre Swait;Peter Boxall;Jordan Louviere

  • Do ethical consumers care about price? A revealed preference analysis of fair trade coffee purchases

    Chris Arnot;Peter Boxall;Sean Cash

  • The impact of oil and natural gas facilities on rural residential property values : a spatial hedonic analysis

    Peter C. Boxall;Wing H. Chan;Melville L. McMillan

  • Factors Influencing Forest Values and Attitudes of Two Stakeholder Groups: The Case of the Foothills Model Forest, Alberta, Canada

    Bonita L. McFarlane;Peter C. Boxall

  • Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement*

    Peter C. Boxall;Wiktor L. Adamowicz;Amanda Moon

  • Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment

    Paula Horne;Peter C. Boxall;Wiktor L. Adamowicz

  • Future Directions of Stated Choice Methods for Environment Valuation

    Vic Adamowicz;Peter Boxall

  • What Is Tenure Security?: Conceptual Implications for Empirical Analysis

    Chris D. Arnot;Martin K. Luckert;Peter C. Boxall

  • The role of social psychological and social structural variables in environmental activism: an example of the forest sector ☆

    Bonita L McFarlane;Peter C Boxall

  • Past Experience and Behavioral Choice Among Wilderness Users

    Bonita L. McFarlane;Peter C. Boxall;David O. Watson

  • Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach

    Peter C. Boxall;Bruce Macnab

  • Participation in wildlife Conservation by birdwatchers

    Bonita L. McFarlane;Peter C. Boxall

  • The influence of place attachment on recreation demand

    Getu Hailu;Peter C. Boxall;Bonita L. McFarlane

  • Influence of Choice Set Considerations in Modeling the Benefits From Improved Water Quality

    T. Peters;W. L. Adamowicz;P. C. Boxall

  • Modeling Recreation Site Choice: Do Hypothetical Choices Reflect Actual Behavior?

    Michel K. Haener;Peter C. Boxall;Wiktor L. Adamowicz

  • Influence of Health and Environmental Information on Hedonic Evaluation of Organic and Conventional Bread

    L.E. Annett;V. Muralidharan;P.C. Boxall;S.B. Cash

  • Valuing aboriginal artifacts: A combined revealed-stated preference approach

    Peter C. Boxall;Jeffrey Englin;Wiktor L. Adamowicz

Frequent Co-Authors

Wiktor L. Adamowicz
Wiktor L. Adamowicz University of Alberta
Jordan J. Louviere
Jordan J. Louviere University of South Australia
Mark Morrison
Mark Morrison University of Queensland
Kevin J. Boyle
Kevin J. Boyle Virginia Tech
Wolfgang Haider
Wolfgang Haider Simon Fraser University
Joffre Swait
Joffre Swait Erasmus University Rotterdam
John Rolfe
John Rolfe Central Queensland University
Steven T. Yen
Steven T. Yen National Taiwan University
Michael Burton
Michael Burton University of Western Australia
David J. Pannell
David J. Pannell University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has opened up new pathways for those interested in Social Sciences and Humanities careers. Flexible degree options can help professionals advance quickly while balancing work and family commitments.

For those looking to enter the field of psychology, pursuing online psyd programs provides clinical training and prepares graduates for licensure as psychologists. Alternatively, students interested in marriage and family therapy can explore accredited mft accredited programs for focused instruction and licensure preparation.

Cost remains a key concern. Fortunately, there are online masters in psychology that are both accessible and budget-friendly, making advanced education more widely available. Meanwhile, educators and leaders can benefit from accelerated doctoral programs in education online, which allow for rapid attainment of advanced credentials.

These online degrees offer flexible formats, making it easier to access specialized training and open doors to diverse roles in education, counseling, mental health, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Boxall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles