World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7945
World Ranking
6711
National Ranking
2395

Kenneth J. Bagstad publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth J. Bagstad sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 105 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Kenneth J. Bagstad D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth J. Bagstad sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth J. Bagstad is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science with a strong focus on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Ocean Engineering.

The main topics in Kenneth J. Bagstad's work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Economic and Environmental Valuation, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Urban Heat Island Mitigation, Water Resources Management and Optimization, Urban Green Space and Health, and Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Kenneth J. Bagstad encompass:

  • Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems (2020), published in Science
  • Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services - A case study for Germany (2020), published in Global Environmental Change
  • A rasterized building footprint dataset for the United States (2020), published in Scientific Data
  • Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union (2021), published in Ecosystem Services
  • Accounting for land in the United States: Integrating physical land cover, land use, and monetary valuation (2020), published in Ecosystem Services

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Kenneth J. Bagstad include:

  • Zachary H. Ancona
  • Pierre D. Glynn
  • Mehdi P. Heris
  • Martín Cicowiez
  • Austin Troy

The scientist often publishes their work in several venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Ecosystem Services
  • Scientific Data
  • Ecological Economics
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Research Letters

Best Publications

  • A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation

    Kenneth J. Bagstad;Darius J. Semmens;Sissel Waage;Robert Winthrop

  • Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services

    Kenneth J. Bagstad;Gary W. Johnson;Brian Voigt;Ferdinando Villa

  • A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment

    Ferdinando Villa;Kenneth J. Bagstad;Brian Voigt;Gary W. Johnson

  • From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments

    Kenneth J. Bagstad;Ferdinando Villa;David Batker;Jennifer Harrison-Cox

  • Riparian plant species richness along lateral and longitudinal gradients of water stress and flood disturbance, San Pedro River, Arizona, USA

    S. J. Lite;K. J. Bagstad;Juliet Stromberg

  • Understanding the impacts of Costa Rica's PES: Are we asking the right questions?

    Amy E. Daniels;Kenneth Bagstad;Valerie Esposito;Azur Moulaert

  • Interregional flows of ecosystem services : Concepts, typology and four cases

    Matthias Schröter;Thomas Koellner;Rob Alkemade;Rob Alkemade;Sebastian Arnhold

  • Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems

    Lars Hein;Kenneth J. Bagstad;Carl Obst;Bram Edens

  • ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services ): a new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation.

    Ferdinando Villa;Ken Bagstad;Gary Johnson;Sergey Krivov

  • Taxes, subsidies, and insurance as drivers of United States coastal development

    Kenneth J. Bagstad;Kevin Stapleton;John R. D'Agostino

  • Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona

    Kenneth J. Bagstad;Darius J. Semmens;Robert Winthrop

  • Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models.

    Javier Martínez-López;Kenneth J. Bagstad;Stefano Balbi;Ainhoa Magrach

  • Machine learning for ecosystem services

    Simon Willcock;Simon Willcock;Javier Martínez-López;Danny A.P. Hooftman;Kenneth J. Bagstad

  • Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows: A case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA

    Ben Zank;Kenneth J. Bagstad;Brian Voigt;Ferdinando Villa

  • On the Effects of Scale for Ecosystem Services Mapping

    Adrienne Grêt-Regamey;Bettina Weibel;Kenneth J. Bagstad;Marika Ferrari

  • Effects of stream flow intermittency on riparian vegetation of a semiarid region river (San Pedro River, Arizona)

    Juliet C. Stromberg;Kenneth J. Bagstad;James M. Leenhouts;Sharon J. Lite

  • Defining Ecosystem Assets for Natural Capital Accounting

    Lars Hein;Kenneth J. Bagstad;Kenneth J. Bagstad;Bram Edens;Carl Obst

  • Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains

    Kenneth J. Bagstad;James M. Reed;James M. Reed;Darius J. Semmens;Benson C. Sherrouse

  • Gaining Ground: Wetlands, Hurricanes, and the Economy: The Value of Restoring the Mississippi River Delta

    David Batker;Isabel de la Torre;Robert Costanza;Paula Swedeen

  • Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning

    Kenneth J. Bagstad;Darius J. Semmens;Zachary H. Ancona;Benson C. Sherrouse

  • Identification of conservation and restoration priority areas in the Danube River based on the multi-functionality of river-floodplain systems.

    Andrea Funk;Javier Martínez-López;Florian Borgwardt;Daniel Trauner

  • Can the Genuine Progress Indicator better inform sustainable regional progress?—A case study for Northeast Ohio

    Kenneth J. Bagstad;Rumi Shammin

  • National Valuation of Monarch Butterflies Indicates an Untapped Potential for Incentive‐Based Conservation

    Jay E. Diffendorfer;John B. Loomis;Leslie Ries;Karen S Oberhauser

  • Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park

    Carena J. van Riper;Gerard T. Kyle;Benson C. Sherrouse;Kenneth J. Bagstad

  • Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows

    Thomas Koellner;Aletta Bonn;Aletta Bonn;Sebastian Arnhold;Kenneth J. Bagstad

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne E. Thogmartin
Wayne E. Thogmartin United States Geological Survey
John B. Loomis
John B. Loomis Colorado State University
Aletta Bonn
Aletta Bonn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Simon Willcock
Simon Willcock Rothamsted Research
Rodrigo A. Medellín
Rodrigo A. Medellín National Autonomous University of Mexico
Gary F. McCracken
Gary F. McCracken University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Juliet C. Stromberg
Juliet C. Stromberg Arizona State University
Robert Costanza
Robert Costanza University College London
Thomas Hein
Thomas Hein BOKU University
Catharina J.E. Schulp
Catharina J.E. Schulp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, there are several valuable online degree options to consider. Many professionals seek advanced credentials such as doctoral programs online no dissertation, which offer flexibility and a streamlined path to doctorate without the traditional dissertation process. This can be ideal for working individuals balancing career and education.

If you're aiming to advance your credentials in education-focused environmental fields, exploring eds to edd program options can be beneficial. These pathways support educators who wish to elevate their practice or transition into leadership roles, often available through reputable universities specializing in online education.

Social work and community wellness intersect significantly with environmental concerns. Pursuing dsw programs online provides a focused route for professionals looking to impact social policy and practice around environmental issues while advancing their clinical or leadership skills.

For a broader foundational approach, best affordable online general studies degree programs offer students a versatile education that integrates multiple disciplines, including environmental topics. This option provides flexibility and affordability, making it easier for students to tailor their studies to career goals.

Each of these pathways supports diverse career opportunities, from research and teaching to policy development and advocacy, reinforcing the interdisciplinary nature of environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth J. Bagstad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles