World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer

Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
12192
World Ranking
4549
National Ranking
1582

Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 109 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to environmental science, particularly in fields related to global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, ecology, insect science, and economics and econometrics. Their research integrates multiple disciplines and addresses issues concerning biodiversity, ecosystem services, and sustainability.

The scientist's recent papers include the following:

  • Diverse values of nature for sustainability, 2023, Nature
  • Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability, 2020, Science
  • Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science, 2020, Nature Sustainability
  • Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050, 2024, Science
  • Global synthesis of effects of plant species diversity on trophic groups and interactions, 2020, Nature Plants

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer's coauthors include:

  • Stephen Polasky (25 joint publications)
  • Justin A. Johnson (20 joint publications)
  • Unai Pascual (18 joint publications)
  • Richard Sharp (16 joint publications)
  • Rachel Neugarten (16 joint publications)

Their work has been published in several key venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) - 18 publications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 5 publications
  • Nature Sustainability - 3 publications
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution - 3 publications
  • Global Environmental Change - 3 publications

Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer has also contributed to book literature, including a publication by The World Bank eBooks:

  • Nature's Frontiers: Achieving Sustainability, Efficiency, and Prosperity with Natural Capital, 2023

Their research addresses topics such as:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Plant and Animal Studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation

Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer's body of work reflects a comprehensive engagement with environmental science, spanning multiple subfields and thematic areas focused on biodiversity, sustainability, and ecosystem dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice

    Anne D. Guerry;Anne D. Guerry;Stephen Polasky;Jane Lubchenco;Rebecca E Chaplin-Kramer

  • A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity.

    Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Megan E. O’Rourke;Eleanor J. Blitzer;Claire Kremen

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Agricultural landscape simplification reduces natural pest control: A quantitative synthesis

    Adrien Rusch;Adrien Rusch;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Mary M. Gardiner;Violetta Hawro

  • Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

    Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca E Chaplin-Kramer;Timothy D. Meehan;Emily A. Martin

  • When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses ☆

    Teja Tscharntke;Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Péter Batáry

  • Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals

    Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sarah K. Jones;Sarah K. Jones;Justin A. Johnson;Kate A. Brauman

  • Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people

    Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Richard P. Sharp;Charlotte Weil;Elena M. Bennett

  • A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes.

    Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Christina M. Kennedy;Claire Kremen;Péter Batáry

  • Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability

    Sandra Díaz;Noelia Zafra-Calvo;Andy Purvis;Peter H. Verburg

  • A new approach to modeling the sediment retention service (InVEST 3.0): Case study of the Cape Fear catchment, North Carolina, USA.

    Perrine Hamel;Rebecca E Chaplin-Kramer;Sarah Sim;Carina Mueller

  • Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage

    Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Richard P. Sharp;Lisa Mandle;Sarah Sim

  • Degradation in carbon stocks near tropical forest edges.

    Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Ivan Ramler;Richard Sharp;Nick M. Haddad

  • Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science

    Lisa Mandle;Analisa Shields-Estrada;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Matthew G. E. Mitchell

  • Global malnutrition overlaps with pollinator-dependent micronutrient production

    Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Emily Dombeck;James Gerber;Katherine A. Knuth

  • Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050

    Unknown

  • Social and ecological analysis of commercial integrated crop livestock systems: Current knowledge and remaining uncertainty

    R. D. Garrett;M. T. Niles;J. D.B. Gil;J. D.B. Gil;A. Gaudin

  • Pest control experiments show benefits of complexity at landscape and local scales

    Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Claire Kremen

  • Global synthesis of effects of plant species diversity on trophic groups and interactions

    Nian Feng Wan;Xiang Rong Zheng;Li Wan Fu;Lars Pødenphant Kiær

  • When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models

    Jesse T. Rieb;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Gretchen C. Daily;Paul R. Armsworth

  • Priorities to Advance Monitoring of Ecosystem Services Using Earth Observation

    Anna F. Cord;Kate A. Brauman;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Andreas Huth;Andreas Huth

  • Insects as providers of ecosystem services: crop pollination and pest control.

    C. Kremen;R. Chaplin-Kramer;A. J. A. Stewart;T. R. New

Frequent Co-Authors

Gretchen C. Daily
Gretchen C. Daily Stanford University
Claire Kremen
Claire Kremen University of British Columbia
Daniel S. Karp
Daniel S. Karp University of California, Davis
Henrique M. Pereira
Henrique M. Pereira Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Fabrice DeClerck
Fabrice DeClerck Bioversity International
Ralf Seppelt
Ralf Seppelt Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Elena M. Bennett
Elena M. Bennett McGill University
Piero Visconti
Piero Visconti International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Katja Poveda
Katja Poveda Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens diverse academic and professional pathways. Many students interested in life sciences can broaden their expertise through interdisciplinary online degrees. For instance, a teacher to speech pathologist route allows those with teaching experience to pivot into healthcare roles, combining biology, linguistics, and therapy.

If you are curious about design within natural environments, you might consider naab-accredited online architecture degrees, which integrate ecological principles into the built environment. Analytical thinkers interested in data and research may pursue a bsc mathematics online to build quantitative skills valuable in ecological modeling.

Creative students wishing to merge art and science can explore the best 2 year graphic design degree online to support outreach, communication, and educational work in ecology. Each online pathway provides flexible learning options and valuable skills for evolving careers in and around the field of Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles