World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Fabrice DeClerck

Fabrice DeClerck

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
57
Citations
32709
World Ranking
2625
National Ranking
31

Fabrice DeClerck publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabrice DeClerck sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 175 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Fabrice DeClerck D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabrice DeClerck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fabrice DeClerck is affiliated with Bioversity International in Italy and focuses research primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their work spans various subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Food Science.

The primary topics explored in Fabrice DeClerck's research encompass:

  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices

Recent publications by Fabrice DeClerck include the following papers:

  • Safe and just Earth system boundaries, 2023, Nature
  • Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy, 2020, Nature
  • Planet-proofing the global food system, 2020, Nature Food
  • Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability, 2020, Science
  • Viewpoint: Rigorous monitoring is necessary to guide food system transformation in the countdown to the 2030 global goals, 2021, Food Policy

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • David Obura
  • Peter H. Verburg
  • Jessica Fanzo
  • Christopher D. Golden
  • Roseline Remans

Fabrice DeClerck publishes regularly in notable scientific venues, with the most frequent publication outlets including:

  • Nature Food (10 publications)
  • One Earth (5 publications)
  • Nature (3 publications)
  • Global Food Security (3 publications)
  • Nature Sustainability (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

    Walter Willett;Johan Rockström;Johan Rockström;Brent Loken;Marco Springmann

  • Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits

    Marco Springmann;Michael Clark;Daniel Mason-D’Croz;Daniel Mason-D’Croz;Keith Wiebe

  • Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa.

    Dan F. B. Flynn;Melanie Gogol-Prokurat;Theresa Nogeire;Nicole Molinari

  • AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds.

    Unknown

  • Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture for Human Prosperity and Global Sustainability

    Johan Rockström;John Williams;Gretchen Daily;Andrew Noble

  • Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: An overview

    Cheryl Palm;Humberto Blanco-Canqui;Fabrice DeClerck;Lydiah Gatere

  • Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy

    David Leclère;Michael Obersteiner;Michael Obersteiner;Mike Barrett;Stuart H.M. Butchart;Stuart H.M. Butchart

  • Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities

    Etienne Laliberté;Jessie A. Wells;Fabrice DeClerck;Daniel J. Metcalfe

  • Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

    Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca E Chaplin-Kramer;Timothy D. Meehan;Emily A. Martin

  • When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses ☆

    Teja Tscharntke;Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Péter Batáry

  • Species loss and aboveground carbon storage in a tropical forest.

    Daniel E. Bunker;Fabrice DeClerck;Jason C. Bradford;Robert K. Colwell

  • Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals

    Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sarah K. Jones;Sarah K. Jones;Justin A. Johnson;Kate A. Brauman

  • Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

    E. Archer;L.E. Dziba;K.J. Mulongoy;Maoela

  • Functional traits in agriculture: agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services

    Stephen A Wood;Daniel S Karp;Daniel S Karp;Fabrice A J DeClerck;Claire Kremen

  • Planet-proofing the global food system

    Johan Rockström;Ottmar Edenhofer;Juliana Gaertner;Fabrice DeClerck

  • Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability

    Sandra Díaz;Noelia Zafra-Calvo;Andy Purvis;Peter H. Verburg

  • Ecosystem services research in Latin America: The state of the art

    Patricia Balvanera;María Uriarte;Lucía Almeida-Leñero;Alice Altesor

  • Viewpoint: Rigorous monitoring is necessary to guide food system transformation in the countdown to the 2030 global goals

    Jessica Fanzo;Lawrence Haddad;Kate R. Schneider;Christophe Béné

  • Get The Science Right When Paying For Nature's Services

    S. Naeem;J. C. Ingram;A. Varga;T. Agardy

  • Biodiversity conservation in human-modified landscapes of Mesoamerica: Past, present and future

    Fabrice A. J. DeClerck;Robin Chazdon;Karen D. Holl;Jeffrey C. Milder

  • Beyond climate-smart agriculture: toward safe operating spaces for global food systems

    Henry Neufeldt;Molly Jahn;Bruce M. Campbell;Bruce M. Campbell;John R. Beddington

  • Land-use intensification reduces functionalredundancy and response diversity in plantcommunities

    Etienne Laliberte;Jessie A. Wells;Fabrice DeClerck;Daniel J. Metcalfe

Frequent Co-Authors

Bryan Finegan
Bryan Finegan Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center
Cheryl A. Palm
Cheryl A. Palm University of Florida
Celia A. Harvey
Celia A. Harvey Monteverde Institute
Line Gordon
Line Gordon Stockholm Resilience Centre
Lee A. Vierling
Lee A. Vierling University of Idaho
Johan Rockström
Johan Rockström Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer Stanford University
Piero Visconti
Piero Visconti International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Mark Mulligan
Mark Mulligan King's College London
Bernardo B. N. Strassburg
Bernardo B. N. Strassburg International Institute for Sustainability (IIS)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to a diverse range of careers in research, conservation, and education. However, many students also discover closely related disciplines that complement their interests or enhance their career prospects. For example, those drawn to social and community change may consider social work online master's programs, which prepare graduates to address complex issues at the intersection of people and the environment.

Psychology and counseling also overlap with ecology, particularly in areas like behavior, adaptation, and conservation advocacy. Individuals looking to upskill quickly may benefit from accelerated psychology degree online options or an accelerated online masters in counseling degree. These programs equip students to work with diverse populations, including those affected by ecological change.

Additionally, students intrigued by the intersection of science and law may explore careers in forensic psychology, where understanding human behavior supports legal and policy work. These pathways illustrate the many dynamic options available to those passionate about the natural world.

Best Scientists Citing Fabrice DeClerck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles