World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 52 4401 4214 337 328 183 13541

Mark Mulligan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Mulligan between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Mulligan published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2022. 24 of the 246 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2022. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 8 publications
1995 2025

246 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Mulligan: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 3
2004 7
2005 7
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 7
2010 10
2011 15
2012 5
2013 15
2014 5
2015 15
2016 14
2017 14
2018 15
2019 15
2020 10
2021 11
2022 21
2023 17
2024 16
2025 8
Total 246
Download as CSV

Mark Mulligan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Mulligan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 183 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400 183
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Mulligan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Mulligan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266 52
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Mulligan is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and specializes in environmental science. Their research spans various subfields including global and planetary change, ecology, water science and technology, nature and landscape conservation, and environmental engineering.

Their work covers a diverse range of topics within environmental science, notably:

  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Several recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark Mulligan illustrate the scope of their research interests and contributions:

  • GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams, 2020, Scientific Data
  • Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Mapping nature's contribution to SDG 6 and implications for other SDGs at policy relevant scales, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Low-cost electronic sensors for environmental research: Pitfalls and opportunities, 2020, Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment

Mark Mulligan frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their notable co-authors include:

  • Arnout van Soesbergen
  • Patrick R. Roehrdanz
  • Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
  • David Hole
  • Stephen Polasky

Their research has been published predominantly in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Ecosystem Services
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers

    G. Grill;B. Lehner;M. Thieme;B. Geenen

  • Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong

    K. O Winemiller;P. B McIntyre;L Castello;E Fluet-Chouinard

  • Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals

    Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sarah K. Jones;Sarah K. Jones;Justin A. Johnson;Kate A. Brauman

  • Hydrometeorology of tropical montane cloud forests: emerging patterns

    L. A. Bruijnzeel;Mark Mulligan;Frederick N. Scatena

  • Environmental Modelling: Finding Simplicity in Complexity

    John Wainwright;Mark Mulligan

  • GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams

    Mark Mulligan;Arnout van Soesbergen;Leonardo Sáenz;Leonardo Sáenz

  • Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human well-being across the developing world

    R. Naidoo;D. Gerkey;D. Hole;A. Pfaff

  • Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water

    Martin Jung;Andy Arnell;Xavier de Lamo;Shaenandhoa García-Rangel

  • Unpacking ecosystem service bundles : Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services

    Rebecca Spake;Rémy Lasseur;Emilie Crouzat;James M. Bullock

  • Practical use of SRTM data in the tropics : Comparisons with digital elevation models generated cartographic data

    Andrew Jarvis;Jorge Enrique Rubiano;Andy Nelson;Andrew Farrow

  • A real-time hydrological model for flood prediction using GIS and the WWW.

    W. Al-Sabhan;Mark Mulligan;George Alan Blackburn

  • TESSA: A toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance

    Kelvin S.-H. Peh;Andrew Balmford;Richard B. Bradbury;Claire Brown

  • Comparison of slope estimates from low resolution DEMs: scaling issues and a fractal method for their solution

    Xiaoyang Zhang;Nick A. Drake;John Wainwright;Mark Mulligan

  • Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis

    Matias Heino;Matti Kummu;Marika Makkonen;Mark Mulligan

  • Modelling and Model Building

    Mark Mulligan;John Wainwright

  • WaterWorld: a self-parameterising, physically-based model for application in data-poor but problem-rich environments globally

    Mark Mulligan

  • Recent Dynamics of Mediterranean Vegetation and Landscape

    M Mulligan;M C Ramos;S M Burke

  • What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal

    Jennifer C. Birch;Ishana Thapa;Andrew Balmford;Richard B. Bradbury

  • On the relationship between a resource based measure of geodiversity and broad scale biodiversity patterns

    K. E. Parks;Mark Mulligan

  • Tropical montane cloud forests: state of knowledge and sustainability perspectives in a changing world

    L.A. Bruijnzeel;M. Kappelle;M. Mulligan;F.N. Scatena

  • Integrated modelling and decision-support tools: a Mediterranean example

    Tim Oxley;Brian S. McIntosh;Nick Winder;Mark Mulligan

Frequent Co-Authors

John Wainwright
John Wainwright Durham University
Fabrice DeClerck
Fabrice DeClerck Bioversity International
Andy Jarvis
Andy Jarvis Bezos Earth Fund
Kelvin S.-H. Peh
Kelvin S.-H. Peh University of Southampton
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer Stanford University
Stuart H. M. Butchart
Stuart H. M. Butchart BirdLife international, UK
Simon Willcock
Simon Willcock Rothamsted Research
David G. Hole
David G. Hole Conservation International
L.A. Bruijnzeel
L.A. Bruijnzeel King's College London
Line Gordon
Line Gordon Stockholm Resilience Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA often connects students to a wide range of interdisciplinary fields and career opportunities. One valuable path is exploring policy and public administration, where professionals manage environmental programs and regulations. For those interested in advancing this skill set, online MPA degrees offer flexible options to gain expertise in government and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding social dynamics plays a crucial role in environmental issues, making sociology a complementary field. Earning an online sociology degree bachelors can enhance your grasp of community impacts and behavioral change, supporting roles in environmental advocacy and education.

For experienced professionals seeking advanced credentials, online doctoral programs present a promising route. Programs like those featured in 1 year PhD programs online no dissertation can accelerate your journey toward becoming a leader in environmental education, policy analysis, or research.

Furthermore, educators aiming to specialize in environmental topics might consider the best online paths from best online EdS to EdD programs. These programs provide advanced training without compromising work commitments, enabling growth in academia and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Mulligan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles