World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 53 4131 3953 76 75 124 29489

Line Gordon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Line Gordon between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Line Gordon published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 16 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Line Gordon: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 5
2011 5
2012 2
2013 3
2014 17
2015 5
2016 16
2017 8
2018 7
2019 10
2020 9
2021 8
2022 5
2023 10
2024 10
2025 15
2026 1
Total 162
Download as CSV

Line Gordon publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Line Gordon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 124 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 124
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Line Gordon D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Line Gordon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217 53
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Line Gordon is affiliated with the Stockholm Resilience Centre in Sweden. Their research spans several fields, predominantly focusing on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. The scientist's main contributions are within multiple subfields, including ecology, food science, plant science, global and planetary change, and sociology and political science.

Their work centers on key topics such as agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, food waste reduction and sustainability, organic food and agriculture, water-energy-food nexus studies, agriculture, land use, rural development, ecosystem dynamics and resilience, and climate variability and models.

Line Gordon has published extensively, with notable recent papers including:

  • Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere, 2021, published in AMBIO
  • Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene, 2020, published in Water Resources Research
  • The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision, 2020, published in One Earth
  • Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales, 2020, published in Earth's Future
  • Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations, 2023, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist frequently collaborates with a number of coauthors, with the most common collaborators including Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Anne Charlotte Bunge, Johan Rockström, Ingo Fetzer, and Carl Folke.

Line Gordon has contributed to various publication venues, primarily:

  • Nature Food
  • One Earth
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Global Food Security
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

    Walter Willett;Johan Rockström;Johan Rockström;Brent Loken;Marco Springmann

  • Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits

    Marco Springmann;Michael Clark;Daniel Mason-D’Croz;Daniel Mason-D’Croz;Keith Wiebe

  • Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.

    Elena M. Bennett;Garry D. Peterson;Garry D. Peterson;Line J. Gordon

  • The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship

    Will Steffen;Will Steffen;Asa Persson;Asa Persson;Lisa Deutsch;J Zalasiewicz

  • Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture for Human Prosperity and Global Sustainability

    Johan Rockström;John Williams;Gretchen Daily;Andrew Noble

  • Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere.

    Carl Folke;Carl Folke;Stephen Polasky;Johan Rockström;Victor Galaz

  • Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals

    Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sarah K. Jones;Sarah K. Jones;Justin A. Johnson;Kate A. Brauman

  • Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services

    Line J. Gordon;C. Max Finlayson;Malin Falkenmark

  • Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises

    Line J. Gordon;Garry D. Peterson;Elena M. Bennett

  • Human modification of global water vapor flows from the land surface

    Line J. Gordon;Will Steffen;Bror F. Jönsson;Carl Folke

  • The unfolding water drama in the Anthropocene: towards a resilience-based perspective on water for global sustainability

    Johan Rockström;Malin Falkenmark;T. Allan;Carl Folke

  • Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship

    Carl Folke;Carl Folke;Henrik Österblom;Jean Baptiste Jouffray;Jean Baptiste Jouffray;Eric F. Lambin;Eric F. Lambin

  • Greening the global water system

    Holger Hoff;Holger Hoff;Malin Falkenmark;D. Gerten;Line Gordon

  • Linkages Among Water Vapor Flows, Food Production, and Terrestrial Ecosystem Services

    Johan Rockström;Line Gordon;Carl Folke;Malin Falkenmark

  • Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents – A review

    Rebecka Malinga;Line J. Gordon;Graham Jewitt;Regina Lindborg

  • Global root zone storage capacity from satellite-based evaporation

    Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen;Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen;Hongkai Gao;Hongkai Gao;Jonas Jägermeyr

  • Analyzing precipitationsheds to understand the vulnerability of rainfall dependent regions

    Patrick W. Keys;R. J. van der Ent;Line J. Gordon;Holger Hoff;Holger Hoff

  • Rewiring food systems to enhance human health and biosphere stewardship.

    Line J Gordon;Victoria Bignet;Beatrice Crona;Beatrice Crona;Patrik J G Henriksson;Patrik J G Henriksson

  • Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene

    Tom Gleeson;Lan Wang‐Erlandsson;Lan Wang‐Erlandsson;Miina Porkka;Miina Porkka;Samuel C. Zipper;Samuel C. Zipper

  • Dealing with drought : The challenge of using water system technologies to break dryland poverty traps

    Elin I. Enfors;Line J. Gordon

  • Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation

    Joern Fischer;Garry D. Peterson;Garry D. Peterson;Toby A. Gardner;Toby A. Gardner;Line J. Gordon

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan Rockström
Johan Rockström Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Carl Folke
Carl Folke Stockholm University
Jennie Barron
Jennie Barron Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Garry D. Peterson
Garry D. Peterson Stockholm Resilience Centre
Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hubert H. G. Savenije Delft University of Technology
Ingo Fetzer
Ingo Fetzer Stockholm Resilience Centre
Fabrice DeClerck
Fabrice DeClerck Bioversity International
Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Claudia Pahl-Wostl Osnabrück University
Holger Hoff
Holger Hoff University of Graz
Malin Falkenmark
Malin Falkenmark Stockholm University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of career paths and interdisciplinary studies. For those interested in broadening their academic horizons, an accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide a flexible foundation, incorporating environmental topics alongside other relevant disciplines.

Students seeking specialized knowledge in earth sciences might consider geology degrees online, which are increasingly offered with practical field components that complement environmental science studies. These degrees prepare graduates for critical roles in environmental consulting, resource management, and sustainability.

For those aiming to balance education with other life commitments, choosing among the easiest bachelor's degree to get options might be a practical approach to gain credentials efficiently while focusing on environmental science electives or minors.

Additionally, professionals looking to advance their careers or engage in research may explore fully funded dsw programs online, which offer unique opportunities to integrate social work perspectives with environmental justice and community health issues. These diverse pathways highlight the interconnected nature of environmental sciences and the importance of accredited, affordable online education options.

Best Scientists Citing Line Gordon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles