World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
29489
World Ranking
4129
National Ranking
77

Line Gordon publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Line Gordon sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 124 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Line Gordon D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Line Gordon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Line Gordon is affiliated with the Stockholm Resilience Centre in Sweden. Their research spans several fields, predominantly focusing on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. The scientist's main contributions are within multiple subfields, including ecology, food science, plant science, global and planetary change, and sociology and political science.

Their work centers on key topics such as agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, food waste reduction and sustainability, organic food and agriculture, water-energy-food nexus studies, agriculture, land use, rural development, ecosystem dynamics and resilience, and climate variability and models.

Line Gordon has published extensively, with notable recent papers including:

  • Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere, 2021, published in AMBIO
  • Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene, 2020, published in Water Resources Research
  • The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision, 2020, published in One Earth
  • Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales, 2020, published in Earth's Future
  • Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations, 2023, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist frequently collaborates with a number of coauthors, with the most common collaborators including Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Anne Charlotte Bunge, Johan Rockström, Ingo Fetzer, and Carl Folke.

Line Gordon has contributed to various publication venues, primarily:

  • Nature Food
  • One Earth
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Global Food Security
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

    Walter Willett;Johan Rockström;Johan Rockström;Brent Loken;Marco Springmann

  • Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits

    Marco Springmann;Michael Clark;Daniel Mason-D’Croz;Daniel Mason-D’Croz;Keith Wiebe

  • Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.

    Elena M. Bennett;Garry D. Peterson;Garry D. Peterson;Line J. Gordon

  • The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship

    Will Steffen;Will Steffen;Asa Persson;Asa Persson;Lisa Deutsch;J Zalasiewicz

  • Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture for Human Prosperity and Global Sustainability

    Johan Rockström;John Williams;Gretchen Daily;Andrew Noble

  • Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere.

    Carl Folke;Carl Folke;Stephen Polasky;Johan Rockström;Victor Galaz

  • Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals

    Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sylvia L.R. Wood;Sarah K. Jones;Sarah K. Jones;Justin A. Johnson;Kate A. Brauman

  • Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services

    Line J. Gordon;C. Max Finlayson;Malin Falkenmark

  • Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises

    Line J. Gordon;Garry D. Peterson;Elena M. Bennett

  • Human modification of global water vapor flows from the land surface

    Line J. Gordon;Will Steffen;Bror F. Jönsson;Carl Folke

  • The unfolding water drama in the Anthropocene: towards a resilience-based perspective on water for global sustainability

    Johan Rockström;Malin Falkenmark;T. Allan;Carl Folke

  • Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship

    Carl Folke;Carl Folke;Henrik Österblom;Jean Baptiste Jouffray;Jean Baptiste Jouffray;Eric F. Lambin;Eric F. Lambin

  • Greening the global water system

    Holger Hoff;Holger Hoff;Malin Falkenmark;D. Gerten;Line Gordon

  • Linkages Among Water Vapor Flows, Food Production, and Terrestrial Ecosystem Services

    Johan Rockström;Line Gordon;Carl Folke;Malin Falkenmark

  • Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents – A review

    Rebecka Malinga;Line J. Gordon;Graham Jewitt;Regina Lindborg

  • Global root zone storage capacity from satellite-based evaporation

    Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen;Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen;Hongkai Gao;Hongkai Gao;Jonas Jägermeyr

  • Analyzing precipitationsheds to understand the vulnerability of rainfall dependent regions

    Patrick W. Keys;R. J. van der Ent;Line J. Gordon;Holger Hoff;Holger Hoff

  • Rewiring food systems to enhance human health and biosphere stewardship.

    Line J Gordon;Victoria Bignet;Beatrice Crona;Beatrice Crona;Patrik J G Henriksson;Patrik J G Henriksson

  • Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene

    Tom Gleeson;Lan Wang‐Erlandsson;Lan Wang‐Erlandsson;Miina Porkka;Miina Porkka;Samuel C. Zipper;Samuel C. Zipper

  • Dealing with drought : The challenge of using water system technologies to break dryland poverty traps

    Elin I. Enfors;Line J. Gordon

  • Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation

    Joern Fischer;Garry D. Peterson;Garry D. Peterson;Toby A. Gardner;Toby A. Gardner;Line J. Gordon

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan Rockström
Johan Rockström Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Carl Folke
Carl Folke Stockholm University
Jennie Barron
Jennie Barron Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Garry D. Peterson
Garry D. Peterson Stockholm Resilience Centre
Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hubert H. G. Savenije Delft University of Technology
Ingo Fetzer
Ingo Fetzer Stockholm Resilience Centre
Fabrice DeClerck
Fabrice DeClerck Bioversity International
Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Claudia Pahl-Wostl Osnabrück University
Holger Hoff
Holger Hoff University of Graz
Malin Falkenmark
Malin Falkenmark Stockholm University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of career paths and interdisciplinary studies. For those interested in broadening their academic horizons, an accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide a flexible foundation, incorporating environmental topics alongside other relevant disciplines.

Students seeking specialized knowledge in earth sciences might consider geology degrees online, which are increasingly offered with practical field components that complement environmental science studies. These degrees prepare graduates for critical roles in environmental consulting, resource management, and sustainability.

For those aiming to balance education with other life commitments, choosing among the easiest bachelor's degree to get options might be a practical approach to gain credentials efficiently while focusing on environmental science electives or minors.

Additionally, professionals looking to advance their careers or engage in research may explore fully funded dsw programs online, which offer unique opportunities to integrate social work perspectives with environmental justice and community health issues. These diverse pathways highlight the interconnected nature of environmental sciences and the importance of accredited, affordable online education options.

Best Scientists Citing Line Gordon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles