World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
25079
World Ranking
6488
National Ranking
164

Ingo Fetzer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Fetzer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 111 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ingo Fetzer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Fetzer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ingo Fetzer is affiliated with the Stockholm Resilience Centre in Sweden, focusing on environmental science with an emphasis on global and planetary change. Their research primarily addresses topics related to ecosystem dynamics and resilience, global energy and sustainability, and climate variability and models.

Their work covers a range of subfields including global and planetary change, water science and technology, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, environmental engineering, and atmospheric science. The main themes investigated include the water-energy-food nexus, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, sustainability and ecological systems analysis, and agriculture sustainability and environmental impact.

Frequent collaborators with Ingo Fetzer include Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Johan Rockström, Dieter Gerten, Ruud van der Ent, and Arie Staal, reflecting a multidisciplinary network of scientists within their research community.

They have published extensively in notable scientific venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature Water

Noteworthy recent publications demonstrate engagement with planetary boundaries, climate tipping points, and sustainable food systems. These include:

  • Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries (2023, Science Advances)
  • Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points (2022, Science)
  • Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries (2020, Nature Sustainability)
  • A planetary boundary for green water (2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment)
  • Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene (2020, Water Resources Research)

Ingo Fetzer has also contributed to book publications, including work published by King's College London titled The Doughnut for Urban Development: Manual, Appendix and Database (2023).

Best Publications

  • Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet

    Will Steffen;Will Steffen;Katherine Richardson;Johan Rockström;Sarah E. Cornell

  • Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene.

    Will Steffen;Johan Rockström;Katherine Richardson;Timothy M. Lenton

  • Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points

    Unknown

  • Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries

    Dieter Gerten;Dieter Gerten;Vera Heck;Vera Heck;Jonas Jägermeyr;Jonas Jägermeyr;Jonas Jägermeyr;Benjamin Leon Bodirsky

  • A planetary boundary for green water

    Unknown

  • Biodegradation of ciprofloxacin in water and soil and its effects on the microbial communities

    Cristobal Girardi;Josephine Greve;Marc Lamshöft;Ingo Fetzer

  • Feedback between drought and deforestation in the Amazon

    Arie Staal;Arie Staal;Bernardo M Flores;Ana Paula D Aguiar;Ana Paula D Aguiar;Joyce H C Bosmans

  • The extent of functional redundancy changes as species’ roles shift in different environments

    Ingo Fetzer;Ingo Fetzer;Karin Johst;Robert Schäwe;Thomas Banitz

  • Population Dynamics within a Microbial Consortium during Growth on Diesel Fuel in Saline Environments

    Sabine Kleinsteuber;Volker Riis;Ingo Fetzer;Hauke Harms

  • Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene

    Tom Gleeson;Lan Wang‐Erlandsson;Lan Wang‐Erlandsson;Miina Porkka;Miina Porkka;Samuel C. Zipper;Samuel C. Zipper

  • Hysteresis of tropical forests in the 21st century.

    Arie Staal;Arie Staal;Ingo Fetzer;Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Joyce H. C. Bosmans

  • Remote land use impacts on river flows through atmospheric teleconnections

    Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Ingo Fetzer;Patrick W. Keys;Patrick W. Keys;Ruud J. van der Ent;Ruud J. van der Ent

  • The Role of Body Size in Complex Food Webs: A Cold Case

    Ute Jacob;Aaron Thierry;Ulrich Brose;Wolf E. Arntz

  • Predator richness increases the effect of prey diversity on prey yield

    Muhammad Saleem;Muhammad Saleem;Ingo Fetzer;Ingo Fetzer;Carsten F. Dormann;Carsten F. Dormann;Hauke Harms

  • The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision

    Tom Gleeson;Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Samuel C. Zipper;Samuel C. Zipper;Miina Porkka;Miina Porkka

  • Aquatic hyphomycete communities as potential bioindicators for assessing anthropogenic stress.

    M. Solé;I. Fetzer;R. Wennrich;K.R. Sridhar

  • Diversity of protists and bacteria determines predation performance and stability

    Muhammad Saleem;Ingo Fetzer;Ingo Fetzer;Hauke Harms;Antonis Chatzinotas

  • Long-term monitoring reveals stable and remarkably similar microbial communities in parallel full-scale biogas reactors digesting energy crops

    Rico Lucas;Anne Kuchenbuch;Ingo Fetzer;Hauke Harms

  • Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales

    Samuel C. Zipper;Samuel C. Zipper;Fernando Jaramillo;Lan Wang-Erlandsson;Sarah E. Cornell

  • Microbial communities along biogeochemical gradients in a hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer

    Karolin Tischer;Sabine Kleinsteuber;Kathleen M. Schleinitz;Ingo Fetzer;Ingo Fetzer

  • CHIC-an automated approach for the detection of dynamic variations in complex microbial communities.

    Christin Koch;Ingo Fetzer;Ingo Fetzer;Hauke Harms;Susann Müller

  • Responses of soil microbial communities to weak electric fields

    Lukas Y. Wick;Friederike Buchholz;Ingo Fetzer;Sabine Kleinsteuber

  • The Kara Sea ecosystem: phytoplankton, zooplankton and benthos communities influenced by river run-off

    H. Deubel;M. Engel;Ingo Fetzer;S. Gagayev

  • Towards a systemic metabolic signature of the arbuscular mycorrhizal interaction.

    Thomas Fester;Ingo Fetzer;Sabine Buchert;Rico Lucas

Frequent Co-Authors

Hauke Harms
Hauke Harms Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Johan Rockström
Johan Rockström Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Sarah E. Cornell
Sarah E. Cornell Stockholm Resilience Centre
Will Steffen
Will Steffen Australian National University
Dieter Gerten
Dieter Gerten Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Line Gordon
Line Gordon Stockholm Resilience Centre
Martin Thullner
Martin Thullner Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Tom Gleeson
Tom Gleeson University of Victoria
Katherine Richardson
Katherine Richardson University of Copenhagen
Matti Kummu
Matti Kummu Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often leads students to consider diverse pathways, including those in the healthcare sector where scientific knowledge is equally valuable. For example, some graduates pursue nursing as a means to combine science with direct patient care. Understanding the pmhnp salary can help you assess the earning potential within specialized nursing roles like Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner.

With a growing need for healthcare professionals, many are interested in accelerated pathways. Programs such as fast track nurse practitioner programs can significantly shorten the time required to enter advanced practice roles.

Online education has further increased accessibility. Options like a 6 month rn to bsn program help qualified nurses earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing quickly, while bridge programs such as adn to fnp allow those with an associate degree to seamlessly progress to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner.

These online degrees provide flexible ways for those interested in science and healthcare to advance their education and career, opening doors to impactful roles in both clinical and research settings.

Best Scientists Citing Ingo Fetzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles