World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
4424
World Ranking
9348
National Ranking
255

Simon van Gaal publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon van Gaal sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 87 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Simon van Gaal D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon van Gaal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Simon van Gaal is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their primary field of study is Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. Additional subfields of interest include Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics within neuroscience, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Simon van Gaal's frequent coauthors demonstrate collaborations across various aspects of neuroscience and psychology. Key collaborators include Johannes J. Fahrenfort, Timo Stein, Jan Willem de Gee, Stijn A. Nuiten, and Lola Beerendonk.

The researcher's recent publications reflect ongoing contributions to topics related to brain function, cognition, and perception. Notable recent papers include:

  • On the pathophysiology and treatment of akinetic mutism, 2020, published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science, 2022, in Neuroscience of Consciousness
  • The human visual system differentially represents subjectively and objectively invisible stimuli, 2021, in PLoS Biology
  • Decreased Alertness Reconfigures Cognitive Control Networks, 2020, in Journal of Neuroscience
  • Pupil Dilation and the Slow Wave ERP Reflect Surprise about Choice Outcome Resulting from Intrinsic Variability in Decision Confidence, 2021, in Cerebral Cortex

Simon van Gaal frequently publishes in a selection of specific research venues. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • PLoS Biology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • eNeuro

Best Publications

  • Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control

    Simon van Gaal;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Johannes J. Fahrenfort;H. Steven Scholte

  • Unconscious Activation of the Prefrontal No-Go Network

    Simon van Gaal;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;H. Steven Scholte;Victor A. F. Lamme

  • Unconscious High-Level Information Processing Implication for Neurobiological Theories of Consciousness

    Simon van Gaal;Simon van Gaal;Simon van Gaal;Victor A. F. Lamme

  • Creative cognition and dopaminergic modulation of fronto-striatal networks: Integrative review and research agenda.

    Nathalie Boot;Matthijs Baas;Simon van Gaal;Roshan Cools

  • Dissociating Consciousness from Inhibitory Control: Evidence for Unconsciously Triggered Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal Task.

    Simon van Gaal;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg;Victor A. F. Lamme

  • Dynamic Interactions between Large-Scale Brain Networks Predict Behavioral Adaptation after Perceptual Errors

    Michael X Cohen;Michael X Cohen;Simon van Gaal;Simon van Gaal

  • Expectations accelerate entry of visual stimuli into awareness

    Yair Pinto;Yair Pinto;Simon van Gaal;Simon van Gaal;Floris P de Lange;Victor A F Lamme

  • From ERPs to MVPA Using the Amsterdam Decoding and Modeling Toolbox (ADAM)

    Johannes J. Fahrenfort;Johannes J. Fahrenfort;Joram van Driel;Simon van Gaal;Christian N. L. Olivers

  • Unconscious errors enhance prefrontal-occipital oscillatory synchrony

    Michael X Cohen;Michael X Cohen;Simon van Gaal;K Richard Ridderinkhof;Victor A F Lamme

  • Dissociable brain mechanisms underlying the conscious and unconscious control of behavior

    Simon van Gaal;Victor A. F. Lamme;Johannes J. Fahrenfort;K. Richard Ridderinkhof

  • Unconsciously Triggered Conflict Adaptation

    Simon van Gaal;Victor A. F. Lamme;K. Richard Ridderinkhof

  • Can the meaning of multiple words be integrated unconsciously

    Simon van Gaal;Lionel Naccache;Julia D. I. Meuwese;Anouk M. van Loon

  • Event-Related Potential, Time-frequency, and Functional Connectivity Facets of Local and Global Auditory Novelty Processing: An Intracranial Study in Humans

    Imen El Karoui;Jean-Remi King;Jacobo Sitt;Florent Meyniel

  • Subthreshold muscle twitches dissociate oscillatory neural signatures of conflicts from errors

    Michael X Cohen;Michael X Cohen;Simon van Gaal

  • How Awareness Changes the Relative Weights of Evidence During Human Decision-Making

    Floris P de Lange;Simon van Gaal;Victor A. F Lamme;Stanislas Dehaene

  • Pre-sma gray-matter density predicts individual differences in action selection in the face of conscious and unconscious response conflict

    Simon van Gaal;H. Steven Scholte;Victor A. F. Lamme;Johannes J. Fahrenfort

  • Opportunities and challenges for a maturing science of consciousness

    Matthias Michel;Diane Beck;Ned Block;Hal Blumenfeld

  • Neuronal integration in visual cortex elevates face category tuning to conscious face perception

    Johannes Fahrenfort;Tineke Snijders;Klaartje Heinen;Simon van Gaal

  • No Evidence that Predictions and Attention Modulate the First Feedforward Sweep of Cortical Information Processing.

    Josipa Alilović;Bart Timmermans;Leon C Reteig;Simon van Gaal

  • An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science

    Unknown

  • Dynamic interactions between top–down expectations and conscious awareness

    Erik L. Meijs;Heleen A. Slagter;Floris P. de Lange;Simon van Gaal;Simon van Gaal

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor A. F. Lamme
Victor A. F. Lamme University of Amsterdam
Floris P. de Lange
Floris P. de Lange Radboud University
H. Steven Scholte
H. Steven Scholte University of Amsterdam
K. Richard Ridderinkhof
K. Richard Ridderinkhof University of Amsterdam
Heleen A. Slagter
Heleen A. Slagter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Michael X Cohen
Michael X Cohen Radboud University
Stanislas Dehaene
Stanislas Dehaene Collège de France
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Tristan A. Bekinschtein
Tristan A. Bekinschtein University of Cambridge
Tobias H. Donner
Tobias H. Donner Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of related online degrees and career paths. For those seeking flexible learning options or to boost their credentials, pursuing certificates online can offer specialized knowledge and competitive advantages in the job market.

Many adults are considering a return to education, but balancing work, family, and studies can be challenging. Fortunately, there are plenty of online classes for adults designed to be accessible, affordable, and tailored to various levels of experience.

Those interested in supporting mental health might consider pursuing msw programs online, leading to roles in social work and counseling. Alternatively, a behavioral focus can be pursued through online bcba programs, preparing graduates for careers in applied behavior analysis.

These options allow students and professionals to diversify their expertise, adapt to workforce needs, and take steps toward meaningful, in-demand careers related to neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Simon van Gaal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles