World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
54
Citations
11760
World Ranking
3164
National Ranking
940

Michael E. Casey publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Casey sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 202 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Michael E. Casey D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Casey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael E. Casey is affiliated with Siemens in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions to radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The scientist has also published work related to neurology, biomedical engineering, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and radiation.

Their main fields of study highlight a concentration in medical imaging techniques and applications, with detailed work in radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging. Other notable research topics include advanced MRI techniques and applications, advanced X-ray and CT imaging, lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, advanced radiotherapy techniques, and intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research.

Michael E. Casey has coauthored several papers with frequent collaborators including Maurizio Conti, Xueqi Guo, Chi Liu, Hasan Sari, and Lars Eriksson.

Frequent publication venues for their work include IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, Medical Image Analysis, Revue LISA / LISA e-journal, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, and the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

The most recent papers authored or coauthored by Michael E. Casey are:

  • Benefit of Improved Performance with State-of-the Art Digital PET/CT for Lesion Detection in Oncology, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Feasibility of using abbreviated scan protocols with population-based input functions for accurate kinetic modeling of [18F]-FDG datasets from a long axial FOV PET scanner, 2022, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Design and Implementation of Automated Clinical Whole Body Parametric PET With Continuous Bed Motion, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences
  • Unsupervised inter-frame motion correction for whole-body dynamic PET using convolutional long short-term memory in a convolutional neural network, 2022, Medical Image Analysis
  • Inter-Pass Motion Correction for Whole-Body Dynamic PET and Parametric Imaging, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences

Best Publications

  • Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts

    S.C. Strother;M.E. Casey;E.J. Hoffman

  • Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements

    V.Y. Panin;F. Kehren;C. Michel;M. Casey

  • A Multicrystal Two Dimensional BGO Detector System for Positron Emission Tomography

    M. E. Casey;R. Nutt

  • Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner

    B W Jakoby;B W Jakoby;B W Jakoby;Y Bercier;M Conti;M E Casey

  • The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph

    K. Wienhard;M. Schmand;M.E. Casey;K. Baker

  • A Single Scatter Simulation Technique for Scatter Correction in 3D PET

    C. C. Watson;D. Newport;M. E. Casey

  • Physical performance of a positron tomograph for brain imaging with retractable septa.

    T J Spinks;T Jones;D L Bailey;D W Townsend

  • Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.

    Dan J. Kadrmas;Michael E. Casey;Maurizio Conti;Bjoern W. Jakoby;Bjoern W. Jakoby;Bjoern W. Jakoby

  • PET Performance Measurements Using the NEMA NU 2-2001 Standard

    Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon;Joel S. Karp;Michael E. Casey;Frank P DiFilippo

  • Evaluation of simulation-based scatter correction for 3-D PET cardiac imaging

    C.C. Watson;D. Newport;M.E. Casey;R.A. deKemp

  • Performance evaluation of the positron scanner ECAT EXACT.

    Klaus Wienhard;Lars Eriksson;Sylke Grootoonk;Mike Casey

  • An Assessment of the Impact of Incorporating Time-of-Flight Information into Clinical PET/CT Imaging

    Cristina Lois;Bjoern W. Jakoby;Bjoern W. Jakoby;Bjoern W. Jakoby;Misty J. Long;Karl F. Hubner

  • Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications

    Arman Rahmim;Arman Rahmim;Martin A. Lodge;Nicolas A. Karakatsanis;Vladimir Y. Panin

  • A multi-centre evaluation of eleven clinically feasible brain PET/MRI attenuation correction techniques using a large cohort of patients

    Claes N. Ladefoged;Ian Law;Udunna Anazodo;Keith St. Lawrence

  • Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography : 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration

    Michael E. Casey;Edward J. Hoffman

  • Performance results of a new DOI detector block for a high resolution PET-LSO research tomograph HRRT

    M. Schmand;L. Eriksson;M.E. Casey;M.S. Andreaco

  • Investigation of depth-of-interaction by pulse shape discrimination in multicrystal detectors read out by avalanche photodiodes

    A. Saoudi;C.M. Pepin;F. Dion;M. Bentourkia

  • First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner

    Maurizio Conti;Bernard Bendriem;Mike Casey;Mu Chen

  • Performance standards in positron emission tomography.

    Joel S. Karp;Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon;Edward J. Hoffman;Thomas K. Lewellen

  • Physical characteristics of the ECAT EXACT3D positron tomograph.

    T J Spinks;T Jones;P M Bloomfield;D L Bailey

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Defrise
Michel Defrise Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Lars Eriksson
Lars Eriksson Linköping University
Arman Rahmim
Arman Rahmim University of British Columbia
Mikael Eriksson
Mikael Eriksson Karolinska Institute
Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Wolf-Dieter Heiss Max Planck Society
Charles L. Melcher
Charles L. Melcher University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Richard L. Wahl
Richard L. Wahl Washington University in St. Louis
Stephan G. Nekolla
Stephan G. Nekolla Technical University of Munich
Richard E. Carson
Richard E. Carson Yale University
Joel S. Karp
Joel S. Karp University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael E. Casey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles