World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marina García-Llorente

Marina García-Llorente

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
10142
World Ranking
4584
National Ranking
142

Marina García-Llorente publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina García-Llorente sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 79 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Marina García-Llorente D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina García-Llorente sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Sociology
  • Biodiversity

Marina García-Llorente mostly deals with Environmental resource management, Ecosystem services, Ecosystem valuation, Ecosystem health and Biodiversity. Her Environmental resource management study incorporates themes from Social preferences and Ecosystem. Her study in Social preferences is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Place attachment and Ecosystem management.

Her study in Environmental economics extends to Ecosystem with its themes. The study of Ecosystem valuation is intertwined with the study of Urban ecosystem in a number of ways. Her Biodiversity research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Species richness, Recreation, Habitat and Water resources.

Her most cited work include:

  • Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. (535 citations)
  • Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review (325 citations)
  • Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review (325 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary scientific interests are in Ecosystem services, Environmental resource management, Ecosystem, Biodiversity and Agriculture. Her study in the fields of Ecosystem valuation under the domain of Ecosystem services overlaps with other disciplines such as Operationalization. Her Environmental resource management research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Spatial ecology and Ecosystem health.

Her studies in Ecosystem health integrate themes in fields like Ecosystem management and Water resources. Marina García-Llorente has included themes like Species richness and Habitat in her Water resources study. Marina García-Llorente works mostly in the field of Ecosystem, limiting it down to topics relating to Urban ecosystem and, in certain cases, Service delivery framework.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Ecosystem services (103.66%)
  • Environmental resource management (90.24%)
  • Ecosystem (24.39%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Ecosystem services (103.66%)
  • Environmental planning (10.98%)
  • Environmental resource management (90.24%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Marina García-Llorente mainly investigates Ecosystem services, Environmental planning, Environmental resource management, Sustainability and Agriculture. Ecosystem services is the subject of her research, which falls under Ecosystem. Her Environmental resource management study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biodiversity, Sustainable management and Set.

Her biological study deals with issues like Ecosystem management, which deal with fields such as Ecosystem health and National park. Her Sustainability research incorporates themes from Care farming, Social connectedness, Leverage and Stewardship. Her research integrates issues of Economic growth and Sustainable development in her study of Agriculture.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning (111 citations)
  • What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas (33 citations)
  • What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas (33 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Sociology
  • Sustainability

Her primary areas of investigation include Ecosystem services, Environmental resource management, Biodiversity, Ecosystem management and Sustainability. Her work deals with themes such as Landscape planning, Agroecology and Sustainable development, which intersect with Ecosystem services. The various areas that Marina García-Llorente examines in her Environmental resource management study include Landscape ecology and Sustainable management.

Biodiversity is closely attributed to Ecosystem in her study. Her Ecosystem management research includes themes of Ecological systems theory, Ecosystem health, Private sector, National park and Wetland. Her Sustainability study which covers Agriculture that intersects with Health care and Marketing.

Best Publications

  • Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences.

    Berta Martín-López;Irene Iniesta-Arandia;Irene Iniesta-Arandia;Marina García-Llorente;Ignacio Palomo

  • Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review

    P.A. Harrison;P.M. Berry;G. Simpson;J.R. Haslett

  • Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment.

    Berta Martín-López;Erik Gómez-Baggethun;Erik Gómez-Baggethun;Marina García-Llorente;Carlos Montes

  • Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management

    Marina García-Llorente;Berta Martín-López;José A. González;Paloma Alcorlo

  • Incorporating the Social–Ecological Approach in Protected Areas in the Anthropocene

    Ignacio Palomo;Carlos Montes;Berta Martín-López;José A. González

  • Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries.

    Ana P. García-Nieto;Marina García-Llorente;Marina García-Llorente;Irene Iniesta-Arandia;Berta Martín-López

  • Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being

    Irene Iniesta-Arandia;Marina García-Llorente;Marina García-Llorente;Pedro A. Aguilera;Carlos Montes

  • When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning

    Francis Turkelboom;Michael Leone;Sander Jacobs;Eszter Kelemen

  • Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis

    Antonio J. Castro;Antonio J. Castro;Peter H. Verburg;Berta Martín-López;Marina Garcia-Llorente;Marina Garcia-Llorente

  • Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands

    Cristina Quintas-Soriano;Cristina Quintas-Soriano;Antonio J. Castro;Antonio J. Castro;Hermelindo Castro;Marina García-Llorente

  • The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach

    Marina García-Llorente;Berta Martín-López;Irene Iniesta-Arandia;Irene Iniesta-Arandia;César A. López-Santiago

  • Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia.

    Guillermo Martínez Pastur;Pablo L. Peri;María V. Lencinas;Marina García-Llorente

  • Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach

    Paula A. Harrison;Robert Dunford;David Nicholas Barton;Eszter Kelemen

  • The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain)

    Berta Martín-López;Marina García-Llorente;Ignacio Palomo;Carlos Montes

  • Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders׳ profiles

    Ana P. García-Nieto;Ana P. García-Nieto;Cristina Quintas-Soriano;Cristina Quintas-Soriano;Marina García-Llorente;Marina García-Llorente;Ignacio Palomo

  • Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region

    A.J. Castro;B. Martín-López;M. García-LLorente;P.A. Aguilera

  • The means determine the end--Pursuing integrated valuation in practice

    Sander Jacobs;Berta Martín-López;David N. Barton;Robert Dunford

  • Unraveling the relationships between ecosystems and human wellbeing in Spain.

    Fernando Santos-Martín;Berta Martín-López;Marina García-Llorente;Marina García-Llorente;Mateo Aguado

  • Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies

    Jan Dick;Francis Turkelboom;Helen Woods;Irene Iniesta-Arandia

  • Delineating boundaries of social-ecological systems for landscape planning: A comprehensive spatial approach

    Berta Martín-López;Ignacio Palomo;Marina García-Llorente;Irene Iniesta-Arandia

  • Analyzing the Social Factors That Influence Willingness to Pay for Invasive Alien Species Management Under Two Different Strategies: Eradication and Prevention

    Marina García-Llorente;Berta Martín-López;Paulo A. L. D. Nunes;José A. González

Frequent Co-Authors

Berta Martín-López
Berta Martín-López Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Antonio Castro
Antonio Castro Spanish National Research Council
Carlos Montes
Carlos Montes Autonomous University of Madrid
Ignacio Palomo
Ignacio Palomo Grenoble Alpes University
Erik Gómez-Baggethun
Erik Gómez-Baggethun Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Paula A. Harrison
Paula A. Harrison Lancaster University
Pam Berry
Pam Berry University of Oxford
David N. Barton
David N. Barton Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Mette Termansen
Mette Termansen University of Copenhagen
Guillermo Martínez Pastur
Guillermo Martínez Pastur National Scientific and Technical Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a pathway that connects ecology and evolution with healthcare or communication, several online programs can expand your options. For example, students without a Communication Sciences or Disorders background can explore a transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors. These bridge programs provide the foundation needed to enter the field of speech-language pathology even with an unrelated undergraduate degree.

For those interested in clinical roles, completing asha accredited slp programs ensures you meet strict professional standards in speech-language pathology. Alternatively, aspiring nurses from other fields may want to consider online bsn programs for non nurses to quickly transition into nursing careers through accelerated online options.

Beyond entry-level roles, advanced degrees lead to specialized and rewarding careers. For example, psychiatric nurse practitioners have varied career prospects and earning potential, detailed in this psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary guide by state. Many of these programs offer flexibility and accessibility, making them attractive options for those seeking career growth in related scientific or healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Marina García-Llorente

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles