World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
11014
World Ranking
6617
National Ranking
285

Ignacio Palomo publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ignacio Palomo sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 72 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ignacio Palomo D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ignacio Palomo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ignacio Palomo is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France and works primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans multiple subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ecology, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

The scientist's work frequently addresses topics such as Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Economic and Environmental Valuation, Sustainability and Climate Change Governance, Urban Green Space and Health, Forest Management and Policy, and Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture.

Ignacio Palomo has contributed to numerous publications, including papers in well-known venues. Some recent papers include:

  • World Scientists' Warning of a Climate Emergency 2021, published in 2021 in BioScience
  • Diverse values of nature for sustainability, 2023, Nature
  • Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability, 2020, People and Nature
  • Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning, 2020, Land Use Policy

Their frequent co-authors include Anna Filyushkina, Sander Jacobs, Tuyeni H. Mwampamba, Mariaelena Huambachano, and Ram Pandit.

Ignacio Palomo has published in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Ecosystems and People, People and Nature, Regional Environmental Change, and Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

Best Publications

  • Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences.

    Berta Martín-López;Irene Iniesta-Arandia;Irene Iniesta-Arandia;Marina García-Llorente;Ignacio Palomo

  • World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency

    William J Ripple;Christopher Wolf;Thomas M Newsome;Jillian W Gregg

  • A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services

    Neville D. Crossman;Benjamin Burkhard;Stoyan Nedkov;Louise Willemen

  • National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows

    Ignacio Palomo;Berta Martín-López;Marion Potschin;Roy Haines-Young

  • Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region

    Francesc Baró;Ignacio Palomo;Grazia Zulian;Pilar Vizcaino

  • Incorporating the Social–Ecological Approach in Protected Areas in the Anthropocene

    Ignacio Palomo;Carlos Montes;Berta Martín-López;José A. González

  • Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies

    Elisa Oteros-Rozas;Elisa Oteros-Rozas;Elisa Oteros-Rozas;Berta Martín-López;Tim M. Daw;Erin L. Bohensky

  • When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning

    Francis Turkelboom;Michael Leone;Sander Jacobs;Eszter Kelemen

  • Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production

    Ignacio Palomo;María R. Felipe-Lucia;María R. Felipe-Lucia;Elena M. Bennett;Berta Martín-López

  • Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change

    Almut Arneth;Yunne-Jai Shin;Paul Leadley;Carlo Rondinini

  • Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability

    Kai M. A. Chan;David R. Boyd;Rachelle K. Gould;Jens Jetzkowitz

  • Participatory Scenario Planning for Protected Areas Management under the Ecosystem Services Framework: the Doñana Social-Ecological System in Southwestern Spain

    Ignacio Palomo;Berta Martín-López;Cesar López-Santiago;Carlos Montes

  • Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystem Services in High Mountain Areas: A Literature Review

    Ignacio Palomo

  • Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: A case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain)

    P. Zorrilla-Miras;I. Palomo;E. Gómez-Baggethun;B. Martín-López

  • Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning

    Alberto González-García;Ignacio Palomo;Ignacio Palomo;José A. González;César A. López

  • The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain)

    Berta Martín-López;Marina García-Llorente;Ignacio Palomo;Carlos Montes

  • Towards an indicator system to assess equitable management in protected areas

    N. Zafra-Calvo;N. Zafra-Calvo;U. Pascual;U. Pascual;U. Pascual;D. Brockington;Brendan Coolsaet

  • Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders׳ profiles

    Ana P. García-Nieto;Ana P. García-Nieto;Cristina Quintas-Soriano;Cristina Quintas-Soriano;Marina García-Llorente;Marina García-Llorente;Ignacio Palomo

  • The means determine the end--Pursuing integrated valuation in practice

    Sander Jacobs;Berta Martín-López;David N. Barton;Robert Dunford

  • Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice

    Heli Saarikoski;Eeva Primmer;Sanna-Riikka Saarela;Paula Antunes

Frequent Co-Authors

Berta Martín-López
Berta Martín-López Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Erik Gómez-Baggethun
Erik Gómez-Baggethun Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Marina García-Llorente
Marina García-Llorente Autonomous University of Madrid
Carlos Montes
Carlos Montes Autonomous University of Madrid
Paula A. Harrison
Paula A. Harrison Lancaster University
David N. Barton
David N. Barton Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Benjamin Burkhard
Benjamin Burkhard University of Hannover
Pam Berry
Pam Berry University of Oxford
Unai Pascual
Unai Pascual Ikerbasque
Antonio Castro
Antonio Castro Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can offer flexible and accessible educational options. Many students begin with easy bachelor degrees, which provide a solid foundation while accommodating diverse learning styles and schedules. These programs can be an excellent stepping stone toward more specialized fields.

Geoscience and geology are closely related to environmental studies, and numerous online geology programs provide in-depth knowledge about Earth's processes, natural resources, and environmental challenges. These programs are ideal for students seeking hands-on scientific skills that can apply in environmental consulting, research, and conservation roles.

Technology is also integral to environmental science careers. Pursuing one of the best GIS programs in the US can open doors to roles that utilize Geographic Information Systems for spatial analysis and environmental planning. GIS expertise is in high demand for managing natural resources and supporting sustainable development.

For those leaning toward leadership and policy, earning a degree through the best online MPA programs equips students with management and public administration skills. This background is crucial for advancing careers in environmental policy, regulatory agencies, or nonprofit leadership focused on environmental advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Ignacio Palomo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles